POStudios Forum

The Royal Archives => The Dark Age => Off-Topic => Topic started by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 04:03:07 PM

Title: The Court Thread
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 04:03:07 PM
Thats why I`m his padaywon XD
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 04:04:15 PM
What the heck is padawon? XD It sounds like something from Star Wars.
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 04:13:40 PM
maybe  ::)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 04:16:11 PM
ACK! Star Wars! *eye twitch*
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 04:19:53 PM
ACK! **** Wars! *eye twitch*

some that doesnt like **** Wars *head twitch* XD
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 04:29:05 PM
*goes into full seizure and blames Raf XD*
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 04:33:55 PM
WASN`T ME!!  :o
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 04:36:45 PM
Yah-huh! I have PROOF that you brought the seizure-inducing topic of Star Wars to this thread!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 04:45:09 PM
What proof?  ;D
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on May 29, 2005, 04:46:25 PM
I am a Jedi Sentinel, completely light-sided. ;D
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 04:47:21 PM
I accuse Raf of tampering with evidence!!!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 04:57:30 PM
What evidence?  ;D
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 05:00:43 PM
I'll prove you innocent-er guilty if it's the last thing I do!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on May 29, 2005, 05:12:22 PM
All rise! The Court is now in session, the honorable judge Bob presiding! :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 05:14:26 PM
He did it your honor! He deleted his post and edited the other one! I KNOW he did!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 05:16:15 PM
 :suffer: :suffer: no one can prove an inocent person guilty  :suffer:

*rises*
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 05:19:46 PM
I'll give you M&Ms if you plead guilty!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on May 29, 2005, 05:20:07 PM
He did it your honor! He deleted his post and edited the other one! I KNOW he did!
Now, now, prosecutor, you know I can't possible judge anyone guilty purely on speculation and hearsay. I need hard evidence. Please tell me you have something to back up your claim or this court will soon dismiss your claim.
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 05:22:44 PM
He said he was a padawon and then I asked what it was! If you'll notice. He edited that post right after I posted saying that I had proof he was guilty!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on May 29, 2005, 05:29:14 PM
He said he was a padawon and then I asked what it was! If you'll notice. He edited that post right after I posted saying that I had proof he was guilty!
I can see the post was edited later, but AFAIK, this forum doesn't log what was changed. Also, a padawon is not related to SW. 8)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 05:31:19 PM
However, in the post he deleted, he said it was! And THEREFORE starting my eye twitch which then became a full-blown seizure!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on May 29, 2005, 05:33:40 PM
However, in the post he deleted, he said it was! And THEREFORE starting my eye twitch which then became a full-blown seizure!
I can find no trace of this deleted post you speak of. Does the accused have anything (more) to say in his defense (though I find it hardly necessary)?
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 05:34:23 PM
Thank you your Honor  ;D
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 05:35:33 PM
I'm sorry, the post was also edited. And he never said anything in his defense to start with! The evidence proves me correct!!  :-[
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 05:40:12 PM
What is there to say? You accuse me of something that i never did.  ;D

edit: in order to not cause confusion, I`m refering to the Star Wars post acusation
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on May 29, 2005, 05:45:53 PM
The evidence proves me correct!!  :-[
What evidence would that be? I see no evidence on the evidence desk.
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 05:47:59 PM
The post editing! He only edited his posts after I said I had proof and then denied it's existance!! The time, what I INSIST happened there, it all fits!! :'( My due process rights have been violated!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 05:52:01 PM
Its a coincedence that editing times are after your post  ::)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 05:53:04 PM
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! You're mean :'(
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on May 29, 2005, 05:55:16 PM
The post editing! He only edited his posts after I said I had proof and then denied it's existance!! The time, what I INSIST happened there, it all fits!! :'( My due process rights have been violated!
There is no misdemeanor in editing one's posts. As far as I'm concerned, that's all pure speculation and thus not admitted as evidence. What process rights do you feel have been violated? You have been given more than enough time to present your hard evidence upon which I can base myself to lay sentence. Even here, a person is innocent until proven guilty, and you will find no self respecting court that will lay sentence on anyone purely based on speculation of another.
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 05:57:12 PM
*runs off crying to the Uber super Ultra Mega Hyper Rosella thread* I have nightmares like these where no one believes me... :'(
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 06:01:11 PM
Bye ::)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 06:02:08 PM
Finally! SOMEONE believes me!  :-[
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on May 29, 2005, 06:03:17 PM
I have nightmares like these where no one believes me... :'(
My last nightmare must have been several years ago. :zzz:
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 06:05:58 PM
*Sings bed time song to both of the kids
XD
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 06:07:11 PM
What the heck? I'm not tired! Now proclaim him guilty! XD
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on May 29, 2005, 06:11:38 PM
Whos guilty? ::)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 29, 2005, 06:12:11 PM
Hey! Not again... :'(
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Jafar on May 30, 2005, 07:31:23 AM
Well, *I* always believed you, Rosella. :)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 30, 2005, 07:32:59 AM
THANK YOU! You're my bestest friend ;D Forget you Raf. The dessert was probably poisoned anyways.
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Jafar on May 30, 2005, 08:04:00 AM
 ;D
Any time. We all know RaF is a tricksy little hobbit anyway. :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Swift on May 30, 2005, 09:32:35 AM
Well, *I* always believed you, Rosella. :)

Not surprising, considering how much Jafar loves Rosella.  :lovegoggles:
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: racx_00 on May 30, 2005, 09:39:56 AM
Not surprising, considering how much Jafar loves Rosella.  :lovegoggles:
Yeah he even agrees that shes innocent ::) :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 30, 2005, 10:41:54 AM
I AM innocent! You voted for me in the innocence poll too so you have no room to talk! ::)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Jafar on May 30, 2005, 03:14:33 PM
I never said she wasn't innocent. I just said she wasn't AS innocent as me until we agreed on a truce. :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on May 30, 2005, 03:15:27 PM
*Sings bed time song to both of the kids
XD
Both? Watch it, you!

I thought the bright little genie was accusing Raf, not the other way around. ???
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 30, 2005, 05:41:06 PM
Not only did I accuse Raf. But he admitted to doing it! Until he edited his post ::)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on May 31, 2005, 01:55:03 PM
Not only did I accuse Raf. But he admitted to doing it! Until he edited his post ::)
If only you had some undeniable proof... ::)

Case dismissed due to lack of evidence. The Court is now retiring.
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on May 31, 2005, 04:08:56 PM
Witnesses are evidence! Plus, LN saw it!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: racx_00 on June 01, 2005, 06:19:59 AM
Plus, LN saw it!
Everyone uses that excuse ;P

BTW I still say your more innocent than Jafar, but not enough proof leads me to believe Raf! :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on June 01, 2005, 03:37:47 PM
As long as I'm the innocent one :angel: :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Louisiana Night on June 01, 2005, 03:46:43 PM
I'm not sure if it's evidence, but yes, I saw his post(before he edited it). ;P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: koko_99_2001 on June 01, 2005, 03:53:26 PM
Why do I get the feeling that we're extremely off-topic? ;P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on June 01, 2005, 03:55:41 PM
Um, maybe because the thread's about you and we're talking about seizures and star wars? :P Maybe Cat's right. So let's just proclaim Raf guilty and be on our way ;P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: koko_99_2001 on June 01, 2005, 03:56:57 PM
 :o You mean...this thread's about me?? :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on June 01, 2005, 05:50:22 PM
Does LN have proof? Nooooo
How many say they saw it? only 1 and privitly to you

I AM INOCENT!!  ;D
HAHAHAHA


Rosella: If there was any poisen in it you should talk to CC about it, his cooks made it  :P

*Sings bed time song to both of the kids
XD
Both? Watch it, you!

XD
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Jafar on June 01, 2005, 06:43:10 PM
The court finds the defendant...GUILTY! Raf is sentenced to 3 days in the dishwashing mines. Court Dismissed!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Questing Character on June 02, 2005, 07:41:27 AM
The evidence proves me correct!!  :-[
What evidence would that be? I see no evidence on the evidence desk.

Hmmm...being evidence could be fun...
>lies on the evidence desk<

What?  The trial is OVER?!  Fine!  I'll be evidence for the next trial! :P >waits...on the evidence desk<
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 02, 2005, 02:47:51 PM
:o You mean...this thread's about me?? :P
It was and unless you see some other new power rising, it still is, but 'Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn' :P.

The case is re-opened due to this new turn of events

I'm not sure if it's evidence, but yes, I saw his post(before he edited it). ;P

The court will allow LN to take the stand if the accusing party would be so kind as to call for the witness to stand.

Does LN have proof? Nooooo
How many say they saw it? only 1 and privitly to you
If I were to play a game of numbers, I would say that's 2 against 1. :pokerface:

The court finds the defendant...GUILTY! Raf is sentenced to 3 days in the dishwashing mines. Court Dismissed!
And where did you suddenly come from? I'm the Court around here! However, you can be president of the Jury. Wouldn't you like to wait to pass your verdict until the accusing party has decided whether or not they want to call forth LN though?

Rosella: If there was any poisen in it you should talk to CC about it, his cooks made it  :P
What's all this talk about poison?

The Court wonders what a person's doing lying on the evidence desk.

Hmmm...being evidence could be fun...
>lies on the evidence desk<

What?  The trial is OVER?!  Fine!  I'll be evidence for the next trial! :P >waits...on the evidence desk<
What is your relevance in this matter?
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on June 02, 2005, 07:30:28 PM
I call LN to the stand! :P Now he just has to find his way here and stick up for me again. :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on June 03, 2005, 01:34:18 PM
I'm not sure if it's evidence, but yes, I saw his post(before he edited it). ;P

The court will allow LN to take the stand if the accusing party would be so kind as to call for the witness to stand.

Will i have a chance to question the witness?


Does LN have proof? Nooooo
How many say they saw it? only 1 and privitly to you
If I were to play a game of numbers, I would say that's 2 against 1. :pokerface:

This isnt a case of numbers your honor, its about justice. Numbers do not matter when justice is involved.  :scholar:

The court finds the defendant...GUILTY! Raf is sentenced to 3 days in the dishwashing mines. Court Dismissed!
And where did you suddenly come from? I'm the Court around here! However, you can be president of the Jury. Wouldn't you like to wait to pass your verdict until the accusing party has decided whether or not they want to call forth LN though?

I demand a fair trail. As can be seen by any member of this court, Jafar doesnt present the inicial neutrol state every jury should have, there for, its NOT a fair trail.
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Jafar on June 03, 2005, 07:47:32 PM
Yeah yeah, I cheated. But at least I didn't edit my post, you convict. :suffer:
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on June 04, 2005, 12:15:41 PM
I guess you NEVER edited your post before  ;)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 05, 2005, 01:55:02 PM
Will i have a chance to question the witness?
Ofcourse the defense will have a chance to cross-examine the witness if he takes the stand. After all, if that weren't the case, I wouldn't dare to call this Court fair.

This isnt a case of numbers your honor, its about justice. Numbers do not matter when justice is involved.  :scholar:
Indeed it is not. However, if two people say one thing, and another says something else, either both of the first are in contempt of the court, or the one that is against them is wrong.

I demand a fair trail. As can be seen by any member of this court, Jafar doesnt present the inicial neutrol state every jury should have, there for, its NOT a fair trail.
I have already reprimanded the President of the Jury, and let his 'verdict' be scratched from the records. However, it's a bit (too) late to ask for anyone of the Jury to be removed, you should have thought about that when the Jury was assembled. Rest assured I am taking all necessary actions tp ensure everybody involved gets a fair trial.

Yeah yeah, I cheated. But at least I didn't edit my post, you convict. :suffer:
Ahem. Convict? :pokerface:
If you keep this up, I will have no choice but remove you from the Jury altogether. :scholar:
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on June 05, 2005, 03:20:08 PM
How many months do the witnesses have to show up?  ::)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 06, 2005, 02:50:49 PM
How many months do the witnesses have to show up?  ::)
Given the current witness's current track record at showing up in this thread, I would say at least one. :pokerface:
Ofcourse, the Court is not preventing you from calling your own witness(es), if you want to in the meantime.
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Louisiana Night on June 06, 2005, 04:04:31 PM
/me takes the stand

 ;P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 07, 2005, 02:05:54 PM
Please put your hand on this here Bible and answer the following question:
Quote
Do you swear to tell the Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth, so help you God (or any other supernatural force)?
:scholar:
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Louisiana Night on June 07, 2005, 05:36:50 PM
I give my word to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 08, 2005, 02:11:06 PM
If both the accusing party and the defending party are satisfied with this reponse from the witness, the accusing party can begin questioning (the witness). 8)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on June 08, 2005, 02:43:18 PM
Well it works for me :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: B'rrr on June 08, 2005, 04:11:36 PM
...can I object? no idea what it is all about but I always want to object *smiles*

o... and Cat actually get 10.000 posts, that is so great  :)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 09, 2005, 04:53:54 PM
...can I object? no idea what it is all about but I always want to object *smiles*
The public cannot object, only a lawyer representing a party, or if someone wants to represent him/-herself, that person, can object to a question asked by the opposing side. Since no question has been asked yet, that's another reason why you can't object.
Will the public please refrain from shouting, thank you. :scholar:
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: koko_99_2001 on June 11, 2005, 03:54:22 PM
Thanks, Rob! I'm glad we got back on topic ;D At least for one post!
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on June 11, 2005, 08:10:27 PM
If both the accusing party and the defending party are satisfied with this reponse from the witness, the accusing party can begin questioning (the witness). 8)

Ask away  :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on June 12, 2005, 10:55:32 AM
Ok. Daniel won't-tell-me-his-middle-name Harrison. Did one or any of Raf's posts on May 29, 2005 mention the seizure inducing *looks around* star wars at one time?
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Louisiana Night on June 12, 2005, 11:38:37 AM
I'm not sure about "seizure inducing", but he mentioned Star Wars(in this post (http://www.postudios.com/blog/forum/index.php?board=37;action=display;threadid=2287;start=100#msg109053)). :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 12, 2005, 02:03:38 PM
I'm not sure about "seizure inducing", but he mentioned Star Wars(in this post (http://www.postudios.com/blog/forum/index.php?board=37;action=display;threadid=2287;start=100#msg109053)). :P
The Court wishes to know if the post you pointed out contained that mention prior to 'May 30, 2005, 12:43:22 AM', considering the original post was made 'May 30, 2005, 12:13:40 AM'. The Court would like to point out these time stamps are probably time zone-dependant.
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Louisiana Night on June 12, 2005, 02:50:09 PM
Quote
May 29, 2005, 05:13:40 PM

That's when Star Wars was mentioned(here anyway). :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 13, 2005, 02:49:20 PM
Quote
May 29, 2005, 05:13:40 PM

That's when Star Wars was mentioned(here anyway). :P
That corresponds with the time-zone difference on the original post. Thank you for that clarification. The accusing party may ask additional questions, or allow the defending party to cross-question. :scholar:
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: racx_00 on June 17, 2005, 12:50:19 PM
Whoa, this is too confusing and smart for my liking :P

*tries to translate into a dumbed down form* XD ;P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 17, 2005, 05:01:52 PM
Whoa, this is too confusing and smart for my liking :P

*tries to translate into a dumbed down form* XD ;P
What part would you like to have in simplified form? In Court certain procedures need to be followed in order to ensure everyone gets a fair trial. However, to the public (those not involved) those procedures do not apply so ask away! 8)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: racx_00 on June 18, 2005, 05:47:36 AM
All the big words and really superior intellectual info :P XD
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 18, 2005, 03:43:21 PM
All the big words and really superior intellectual info :P XD
I have no clue about your intellectual capabilities, so I can't know what you consider a 'big word' and 'superior intellectual info'. 8)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Questing Character on June 20, 2005, 10:37:45 AM
CC, my relevance to the case is that I'm sitting on the evidence table, and therefore am a piece of evidence.  If there were any decent lawyers on this case, they'd have used me as Exhibit A and made me seem even *more* relevant than I actually am. ;D

>continues to sit on the evidence table<
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 21, 2005, 02:42:48 PM
CC, my relevance to the case is that I'm sitting on the evidence table, and therefore am a piece of evidence.  If there were any decent lawyers on this case, they'd have used me as Exhibit A and made me seem even *more* relevant than I actually am. ;D

>continues to sit on the evidence table<
In that case:
Would any of the parties please be so kind as to explain the meaning of this person lying on the evidence desk?
PS: The Court is in no way responsible for the quality of the lawyers on this case.
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: racx_00 on June 22, 2005, 08:36:02 PM
Obviously he proves that Raf is innocent which closes this case :D :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on June 23, 2005, 10:04:04 AM
Racx, you're mean :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on June 24, 2005, 03:51:16 PM
CC, my relevance to the case is that I'm sitting on the evidence table, and therefore am a piece of evidence.  If there were any decent lawyers on this case, they'd have used me as Exhibit A and made me seem even *more* relevant than I actually am. ;D

>continues to sit on the evidence table<
In that case:
Would any of the parties please be so kind as to explain the meaning of this person lying on the evidence desk?

Sorry for the delay your honer  :P

LN - Where were you on the night of the 5th of november around 1900 hours?  ::)

and why didnt you inform the court of your "testamony" first before informing the accusing party? All i see here, ladies, and gentilmen (and things that call themselves evidence) of the courtroom, is an agreement between the "witness" and the offending party against my client... err I mean me  :P  8)

As the the evidence, look at Exibit A. Now stop looking before you scare it away XD
This rare specie is in risk of extiction due to this mindless accusation against my person. If we could stop worrying about only about ourselves and care for these creatures the forum no the nation no the world would be a better place. Nothing more to add your honor

*sits down*
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Louisiana Night on June 24, 2005, 04:58:46 PM
LN - Where were you on the night of the 5th of november around 1900 hours?  ::)

If you see a post made by me, at the time you named, then I must have been at my PC. ;P

and why didnt you inform the court of your "testamony" first before informing the accusing party?

Well, if they learned of it first, it was because they read my post first... most likely. :P
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on June 24, 2005, 05:09:45 PM
How odd that your post came after she mentioned the fact that you're a "witness"  ::)
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Questing Character on June 25, 2005, 01:29:40 PM
Actually....Raf, I hate to point it out to you...but really, hoo-mans are not in danger of extinction. Or did you mean Questies?  'Cause I am the only Questie, that's fer sure. :P

>stays on the evidence table...it's comfortable! :P<
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on June 25, 2005, 02:46:29 PM
Yes, Q's are in danger. Help us to save Q's from desaster XD
Title: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on June 26, 2005, 08:26:00 AM
But whether Q's are endangered or not has no relevence to this case! Raf is trying to use sympathy as his case because he knows he has no other case! He is avoiding the actual matter of this case. Please, your Honor, declare this matter irrelevant and get on with the prosecution.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Yonkey on June 26, 2005, 08:44:12 AM
Supreme Court Justice Yonkey has decided that this case deserves its own thread.  8)

XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on June 26, 2005, 08:46:44 AM
W00T! Now can Supreme Court Justice Yonkey declare Raf guilty? :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Yonkey on June 26, 2005, 08:52:20 AM
Sorry, that's for Judge CC to decide. ;P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on June 26, 2005, 09:01:37 AM
Meanieh :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Raforever on June 26, 2005, 10:32:22 AM
Supreme Court Justice Yonkey has decided that this case deserves its own thread.  8)

XD

XD I dont like the name XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Rosella on June 26, 2005, 10:34:00 AM
I do! It means I have the whole forum on my side!! :suffer:

EDIT: Raf,  you're a cheater. :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. The accusing party
Post by: Raforever on June 26, 2005, 10:46:41 AM
Q and racx demonstrated trust in me  :P

edit: I'm not a cheater, i just put a name with a similier meaning  ::)
Title: Re: Court case: Raforever vs. Rosella
Post by: Rosella on June 26, 2005, 11:18:02 AM
So, at least put MY name in there!!! (see above title)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. The accusing party
Post by: Raforever on June 26, 2005, 12:14:48 PM
YES MAM!!  :D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on June 26, 2005, 01:48:18 PM
Good! Now you need an apostrophe between the "m" and the "am" because it's an abbreviation of Madam. ::)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on June 26, 2005, 02:04:09 PM
ooooops

Sorry M'am  ;)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on June 26, 2005, 02:49:05 PM
Good! Now if you'd just plead guilty I'll be on my way.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on June 26, 2005, 04:31:16 PM
No m'am XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on June 27, 2005, 10:26:00 AM
I think that the endangerment of Qs has everything to do with this case!!

What is this case even about? :P

(Yes, I'm still on the evidence table...I think I'm gonna add that to my siggy. :P)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on June 27, 2005, 12:04:38 PM
*Decides on whos side to join* XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on June 27, 2005, 12:44:15 PM
Take my side! I have cupcakes!!!
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on June 28, 2005, 06:52:28 AM
Take my side! I have cookies!! XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on June 28, 2005, 06:58:25 AM
*eats cookies & cupcakes*

I'm still undecided. XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: copycat on June 28, 2005, 02:24:48 PM
Obviously he proves that Raf is innocent which closes this case :D :P
The court would like to inform the public that it is not up to any of them to call this case closed, but up to the Court. 8)

But whether Q's are endangered or not has no relevence to this case! Raf is trying to use sympathy as his case because he knows he has no other case! He is avoiding the actual matter of this case. Please, your Honor, declare this matter irrelevant and get on with the prosecution.
I have to agree I fail to see how the possible extinction of the Q's race is relevant to this case. If the defending party can not prove its relevance, I will have to scrap all comments on the account of Q's extintion case off the transcript of this process.

W00T! Now can Supreme Court Justice Yonkey declare Raf guilty? :P

Meanieh :P

I would like to add that only one Court can be 'busy' with a case at one given time. Even another court may not intervene with the current proceedings, apart from things that are outside of the legal 'hemisphere', such as 'accomodations'. That is not mean, that's just normal in a Legal System.

Q and racx demonstrated trust in me  :P
Do you have an approved, irrevocable testimony of these people to put on the evidence table?

I think that the endangerment of Qs has everything to do with this case!!
Will the evidence, even though I fail to see the relevance, please keep QUIET!!

What is this case even about? :P
Whether or not one of Raf's posts mentioned Star Wars and thus caused Rosella's heart to take a wrong turn.

I'm still undecided. XD
Would the Supreme Court Justice please explain its presence in thie Court?

Okay, if none of the parties have more questions for the current witness he may stand down again.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Yonkey on June 28, 2005, 08:07:29 PM
Would the Supreme Court Justice please explain its presence in thie Court?

I just came for the free food. ;P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on June 28, 2005, 08:42:33 PM
I will *not* keep quiet -- I'm the evidence! I deserve to be heard!!  My species is endangered and YOU don't even care!  What kind of a justice system is this anyways?  I WANT A REFUND!!

And no, I'm not getting off the evidence table...especially not until I get my refund.  I paid good money to be on the evidence table!!  And now Yonkey gets free food just cause he's the Supreme Court Justice?!  I'm the evidence...and endangered!  I should get free food too!  Whatever food I want even!  SEND IN THE WAITERS!!

I would also like to state for the record that I do *not* trust Raf. I may trust Raf if he can convince the court that I (and the endangerment of my species) have everything to do with this case! (I am, after all, the evidence...)

And thank you for explaining what this is all about.  I think I can partially explain my presence..
...anyone remember that light saber fight we had waaaaaaaay back when?  Yup, I was in that. ;D
...that counts, right?  That involves me in this case! :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on June 29, 2005, 02:10:09 PM
I will *not* keep quiet -- I'm the evidence! I deserve to be heard!!  My species is endangered and YOU don't even care!  What kind of a justice system is this anyways?
If you get called forth as a withess, you can talk all you like, but NOT as evidence. Whether or not I care you're an endangered species is totally irrelvant to this case. If (and when) that matter is duscessed, I will post my view on the subject, but not in this Court. This is a perfectly normal justice system, you can only tackle one case at a time.

And no, I'm not getting off the evidence table...especially not until I get my refund.  I paid good money to be on the evidence table!!  And now Yonkey gets free food just cause he's the Supreme Court Justice?!  I'm the evidence...and endangered!  I should get free food too!  Whatever food I want even!  SEND IN THE WAITERS!!
We have bailiffs (?sp) to forcefully remove unwilling evidence from the evidence table you know. And you're really pushing my patience... If you paid money to anyone to get onto the evidence table, the person you paid it to had no right to do so and was probably not affiliated with this court either. I advise you to seek it out with him/her. Since your presence, ON THE EVIDENCE TABLE, is unwarranted, no food will be served. You can get (free) food, just as anyone else, in the mess room.

I would also like to state for the record that I do *not* trust Raf. I may trust Raf if he can convince the court that I (and the endangerment of my species) have everything to do with this case! (I am, after all, the evidence...)
Duly noted.

And thank you for explaining what this is all about.  I think I can partially explain my presence..
...anyone remember that light saber fight we had waaaaaaaay back when?  Yup, I was in that. ;D
...that counts, right?  That involves me in this case! :P
Light saber fight? Doesn't ring a bell, but then again, my memory is extremely selective.
If you were involved in a [size=0]Star Wars[/size] act, you can be called forth as a witness and state your case there. However, that is up to one of the parties to do that, I can't interfere with calling forth witnesses.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 01, 2005, 02:31:16 PM
Can we just call it a tie and go to the mess room eat?  ;D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 01, 2005, 03:28:32 PM
Can we just call it a tie and go to the mess room eat?  ;D
If the two parties agree on settling this matter outside of the Court I will stop the proceedings, ofcourse. However, the proceedings needn't be stopped in order to to go the mess room and eat. In fact, there are pauses at regular intervals to enable to go and grab a bite (or two, three,...) or even sleep. :pleased:
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 02, 2005, 07:35:22 AM
*Still undecided on whos side to join* :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on July 02, 2005, 10:42:25 AM
Join the evidence, of course!  This is the best side, because people choose for you. ;D

Someone find the lightsaber fight for CC! LN, you were involved in that...find it! :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 02, 2005, 11:25:20 AM
BRB your honor

*goes eat* XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Louisiana Night on July 02, 2005, 12:48:39 PM
DARTH Q-MEH (http://www.postudios.com/blog/forum/index.php?board=37;action=display;threadid=1348;start=560#msg66566)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 02, 2005, 02:06:10 PM
BRB your honor

*goes eat* XD
NP, Court adjourned (?sp)

DARTH Q-MEH (http://www.postudios.com/blog/forum/index.php?board=37;action=display;threadid=1348;start=560#msg66566)
Hmmm, if Keemeh's light saber turned red when she wielded it that would mean she was leaning towards the dark side. :o
The Court orders the clerk to put a transcript of that discussion on the evidence table, next to Q (that is, until I ban him from my Court room).
Thanks LN! :D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Louisiana Night on July 02, 2005, 03:37:56 PM
np :)

*wonders how long it will be, till the court comes to a decision* :P

***follows Raforever to the food court( or whatever it is XD )
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 02, 2005, 09:04:21 PM
*Sits on the evidence desk* :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 03, 2005, 10:15:31 AM
The evidence desk is getting pretty full XD speaking of being full, come on LN  ;D

*eats and eats and eats and eats and.......*
 ::)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on July 04, 2005, 01:06:54 PM
CC, even if you were to ban me, do you think I would get off the evidence table?

Just to reinforce what I mean...>duct tapes self to the evidence table< Now I have to be here or there is no evidence...for I am not just *on* the evidence table..I am one with the evidence table...

And LN has just proven my relevance to this case...I am Darth Q-meh...the only Jedi Q...and since Qs are endangered, there probably won't be any other Q Jedis which is why the endangerment of Qs is extremely pertinent to this case.

...so I just realized the problem with duct taping myself to the evidence table.  I can't get to the food!!
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 04, 2005, 01:50:44 PM
*tortures Q by waving food in front of him*

Q's right about the jedi thingy, we should at least try to save his species  ::)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosedragon on July 04, 2005, 05:47:04 PM
Did Raforever change his name to Jafar's kid? I must have missed this. I changed my name from Dragonstar to Rosedragon.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 05, 2005, 04:23:45 PM
yep XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 06, 2005, 02:12:40 PM
*wonders how long it will be, till the court comes to a decision* :P
Since this Court has gotten its own thread, it might take some time, especially since the accusing party has suddenly disappeared. 8)

CC, even if you were to ban me, do you think I would get off the evidence table?

Just to reinforce what I mean...>duct tapes self to the evidence table< Now I have to be here or there is no evidence...for I am not just *on* the evidence table..I am one with the evidence table...
You'd probably not get off out of your own free will, but as This Court has already told you, it can be done by force if needed. And do you really think This Court's decisions concerning the evidence can be stopped by mere duct tape? Also, do you think that is the ONLY evidence table we have? ::)

And LN has just proven my relevance to this case...I am Darth Q-meh...the only Jedi Q...and since Qs are endangered, there probably won't be any other Q Jedis which is why the endangerment of Qs is extremely pertinent to this case.
The relevance of this issue has been put into a transcript and put on the evidence desk, so your presence is no longer needed. If you're endangered, I can put you in protective custody, but NOT ON MY EVIDENCE DESK! (This Court is getting quite aggrevated with all this talk about endangered species, which has absolutely NO pertinence to this case.)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 06, 2005, 02:19:53 PM
I have not disappeared! I simply feel that even if other Star Wars topics were mentioned, they still hold no relevence to this case because we are talking about a specific mention of it.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 06, 2005, 03:01:46 PM
I have not disappeared!
Fine, however, the defending party has asked if this issue could be settled outside of the court, and the accusing party has yet to answer to that request. If not, other witnesses can be summoned, or, if none are required, This Court can retire (I think that's the proper term although I'm not 100% sure of that  and pass sentence when it has come to a decision.

I simply feel that even if other Star Wars topics were mentioned, they still hold no relevence to this case because we are talking about a specific mention of it.
And I am dismissing them as fast as I can, but I have to follow procedure, you know.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 06, 2005, 03:27:04 PM
I think that now that this is it's own thread, it deserves to have an actual verdict. :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 06, 2005, 03:46:19 PM
In that case I will now hear the closing statements of both parties, unless the defending party might want to call forth new witnesses.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 08, 2005, 07:44:25 PM
no forther questions, or witnesses or comments

please carry on your honor
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 08, 2005, 07:56:43 PM
I would like to present evidence!

Quote
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
hey Squall
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
care to be my witness?
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
*shuns back* XD
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
Squally!!??
Squall Griever Leonhart says:
Witness?
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
yeah
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
I really really need your help
Squall Griever Leonhart says:
...Whatever.
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
just say that you saw no star wars while visiting the thread
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
that should help ALOT!!
Rosella says:
Except
Rosella says:
You edited the Star Wars out of your posts
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
i did not XD
Rosella says:
::)
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
you BROUGHT the topic forth
Squall Griever Leonhart says:
...I don't visit the forums, so I wouldn't be a proper witness.
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
so?
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
it doesnt matter :P
Squall Griever Leonhart says:
It's not my problem.
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
*makes puppy dog eyes*
Squall Griever Leonhart says:
Everyone has to take care of themselves.
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
would you leave a friend in need?
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
yes but not always may a person achieve such capability
Squall Griever Leonhart says:
...Whatever.
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
i.e. me needs your help
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
pplllllllllleeeeeeeeaaaaassssssseeeeeee
Rosella says:
Because Raf knows, in a fair trial, I'd win
Rosella says:
Because he did edit his posts
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
your word is worth a thousand words and you know that
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
I did not XD
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
....k.... maybe i did.....
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
but the star wars thing was your fault
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
XD
Rosella says:
You're the one who said padawan or whatever
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
padaywan
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
actually
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
XD
Rosella says:
That's because you edited it
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
i did not
Rosella says:
Now, Jafar, remember this conversation
Jafar says:
I will
Rosella says:
Because I'll be calling you forth as a witness to this confession
<Rafael>  - Jafar's kid - "FEED ME!!" says:
XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 09, 2005, 09:30:53 AM
lies!!

She´s out to get me and i bet that Jafar friend of her´s is helping her out again.

How do we know you didn´t forge that with your helper?  

 ::)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 09, 2005, 10:46:53 AM
Yeah, if shes against him she could have forged that, and seeing Jafar is mad at Raf for pretending to be his son, he would also have the motive to help forge it ;)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 09, 2005, 12:58:20 PM
w00tness XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 01:03:48 PM
I would have NO reason to forge this. Anyone who knows me knows that my conscience would eat me alive if I did something like that. And Jafar may be annoyed (and a little disturbed,) by Raf, but that's no reason to suspect conspiricy. This is an honest, unedited conversation. And I feel like the comments of people not even involved in this trial (*cough* Jason) should not be considered unless he is called to give his testimony. It should also be mentioned, that he was not in the aforementioned chat.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 09, 2005, 01:14:33 PM
Well it seems as though your post has been edited, maybe it contained Star Wars references in it, or a statement about the truth of that conversation like the fact that it was forged. Also if I wasn't in that conversation then that means you have no proof that Raf was in it either!
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 01:18:01 PM
Yeah I do. I have logs. I also have witnesses (though one is the defendant and one refuses to come here.) And actually, the part of my post that was edited said something like "And since Jason wasn't there, his thoughts of conspiricy are just his own, unproven opinions." Only it was worded a lot worse. So I took it out.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 09, 2005, 01:18:04 PM
meet my lawyer  ;D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 09, 2005, 01:22:15 PM
Maybe the logs were tampered with, you have no proof to say otherwise! Also we don't know if the edited part said that, and no one believed Raf when he said something along those lines, everyone judged him and said he made a reference to Star Wars!
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 01:25:41 PM
That's because he DID say something about Star Wars. ::) This whole trial has been about how I have presented evidence and witnesses, and people have defended Raf/changed the subject/tried to discredit me. I have to say that, Jason, as glad as I am to have you on this case, did you not say that you're only doing this because "Raf has no one to stand up for him :\"?
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 09, 2005, 01:30:44 PM
Yes, I said that, but its also because I believe him! Also I still se no proof that he said something about Star Wars, the only way you can prove that he said something about Star Wars is to get him to confess in front of me or Bob :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 09, 2005, 01:33:12 PM
... and there´s nothing to confess  :suffer:
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 01:34:31 PM
No, you see, he DID confess in this thread. However, he edited the confession out of his posts. He probably thought all was not lost and tried to see if he could get away with this longer. And he does NOT have to confess in front of a judge or a lawyer. If he even mentions it in passing, and I can prove he said it, it counts as a full confession.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Skye on July 09, 2005, 01:38:02 PM
.....so what if Raf said something about Star Wars? Somebody fill me in here?
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 09, 2005, 01:38:57 PM
Yes but there is no way you can prove that! I like I said before that conversation cannot count as evidence because you and Jafar both have motives to get back at Raf, so therefore you both forged it!

The only way to prove it is if you can get this witness!
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 09, 2005, 01:38:59 PM
[wisper]you must ask for permission to speak in the court gab[/wisper]  ;)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 01:44:01 PM
Except I didn't forge it. It's your (no offense) totally useless (because you weren't there) opinion, against mine. And, if CC will allow me to call a witness, I'm sure Jafar would gladly give his testimony. And, as I've said before, I would not forge a confession. It is a crime to present false evidence or give false testimony in court. I'm am fully aware of this. I would never break a law unless someone (or many people's) lives were at stake. As this is obviously no such case, I see no reason to infringe on such a serious law.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 09, 2005, 01:49:46 PM
Yes but that doesn't rid the fact of you and Jafar having a motive to give false evidence! Also as much as I want to believe you, there is no proof that it wasn't forged!
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 02:01:52 PM
And there is no proof it was forged either. "Innocent until proven guilty." I feel, that if that is the basis of the court, than my evidence will be accepted as true, until proven otherwise. Also the motive does not match up with the crime. Would you kill someone for stepping on your toe? ::) No.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 09, 2005, 02:04:37 PM
If they broke it and I hated them, yes!

Also "Innocent until proven guilty" would also then apply for Raf which means he is innocent and you have no proof against him. I mean everyone knows that you can have the same name, font and colour of font in MSN so maybe someone used Raf's name to make him look guilty!
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 02:18:12 PM
Except I don't hate Raf. And I HAVE proof that Raf is guilty. I wouldn't use false evidence. And you may be able to have the same screenname and font, but you cannot duplicate their email address which appears at the top of a screen during a conversation. And though this would not exist during a chat, no one's names were changed during the chat, or my buddy list would have betrayed their identity.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Father Ghostface on July 09, 2005, 02:30:12 PM
AH-HA!!!! This is where you said you were on trial! I don't know it's about or how Raforever is guilty, but I will watch. And you thought I wouldn't find this trial place thingy whatever did you Rosella?BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, Okay yall go back to what your doing. Don't mind me......*sneaks aways while eating cake.  ;D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 09, 2005, 04:30:12 PM
And, if CC will allow me to call a witness, I'm sure Jafar would gladly give his testimony.
And not so long ago you were ready to wrap up this case and leave it to the jury to decide?
Anyway, since the case has not been handed over to the jury, additional witnesses can still be called forth. Be warned that if I find out any witness committing perjury, I will not hesitate to scrap their testimony and charge them myself.


"Innocent until proven guilty." I feel, that if that is the basis of the court, than my evidence will be accepted as true, until proven otherwise.
You are not on court here at this moment. This Court is here to decide whether or not Raf is guilty of the crime you have claimed him to be. And yes, that is the basis of this court, as you should have noticed when this Court proclaimed Raf to be not guilty at the beginning of this thread due to the lack of evidence.

This is where you said you were on trial! I don't know it's about or how Raforever is guilty, but I will watch. And you thought I wouldn't find this trial place thingy whatever did you Rosella?
Like I said, it's not Rosella that's on trial, it's Raf. 8)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 07:28:14 PM
In that case, I call Jafar to the stand. :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Father Ghostface on July 09, 2005, 07:51:04 PM
*GASP! Jafar! Oooooo...this is getting good. :pleased:
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on July 09, 2005, 07:59:45 PM
/me comes to the stand :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 08:04:22 PM
So, Jafar, *shows logs* Do these logs, shown in reply #136 sound familiar to you? Did this conversation actually happen with you, Raf, Squall, and me?
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on July 09, 2005, 08:07:41 PM
Not only do they sound familiar, I have my own copy of them! This conversation DID happen, and included Raf, Kels, Squall,and me.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 08:09:54 PM
And are you willing to state, in a court of law, of your own free will, that these conversations are not tampered with in any way? And that they are authentic?
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on July 09, 2005, 08:13:10 PM
Yes, That is exactly how the conversation happened.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 09, 2005, 08:13:55 PM
Thank you, no further questions.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Father Ghostface on July 09, 2005, 09:32:59 PM
Oh wow! This suspense is killing me!  !!!
*Sits in front row eating popcorn while Rosella interigtes Jafar.

Rosella: "I want the TRUTH!"

Jafar: "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH! Or can you? :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on July 09, 2005, 09:39:16 PM
We all want the truth, and the one who can't handle it is RAFOREVER! Oh, and Racx too. :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: MATTANDALEX on July 09, 2005, 09:50:34 PM
so what happens if Raf is found guilty? :stabs:
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on July 09, 2005, 11:04:37 PM
He has to watch Star Wars: Episode 1 every weekend, for life. :-X

 ;-D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Louisiana Night on July 10, 2005, 12:18:49 AM
.....so what if Raf said something about Star Wars? Somebody fill me in here?

Raforever mentioned Star Wars in his post, and Rosella is simply trying to prove he actually posted it(he edited his post, and denies posting it... which is what started this thread).

and if what I just said makes no sense, remember...

Haven makes no sense. ;P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 10, 2005, 03:07:48 AM
It is unfair to make false accusations while the defendant is not present!

He has to watch Star Wars: Episode 1 every weekend, for life. :-X

 ;-D
I think Star Wars: Episode 2 is better punishment :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on July 10, 2005, 03:28:16 AM
Why not go for the maximum punishment and make him watch Episode 3? :suffer:
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 10, 2005, 03:29:34 AM
I would prefer to watch Episode 3, seeing it was much better than the first two :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on July 10, 2005, 03:30:46 AM
Personally, I thought Episode 3 was WORSE then the other two. :X
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 10, 2005, 03:42:00 AM
Lol! XD

Well IMO Episode 2 was the worst XD, I must admit though there were alot of lame lines in Episode 3 XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Father Ghostface on July 10, 2005, 11:02:28 AM
I'm apart of the jury now! YAY!  :D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 10, 2005, 11:29:32 AM
Yay! First jury member! :D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 10, 2005, 01:08:38 PM
He has to watch Star Wars: Episode 1 every weekend, for life. :-X
 ;-D
I think Star Wars: Episode 2 is better punishment :P

punishmento? thats my favorite one  :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on July 10, 2005, 05:10:55 PM
I thought 1 was the worst...  *:stabs: Jar Jar* XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 10, 2005, 05:18:03 PM
Jar Jar isnt that bad :P
he's just sorta... clumsy  ;)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on July 10, 2005, 08:26:06 PM
In that case, we'll make you play Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing (http://www.gamefaqs.com/computer/doswin/review/919220.html) 5 hours every day of the weekend. :evil:
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Father Ghostface on July 10, 2005, 08:54:32 PM
Uh....I don't mean to melt the ice here but how exactly are you guys going to...make Raf play Big Rigs or watch Star Wars? Just a thought....
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on July 10, 2005, 09:05:04 PM
Er....uh....um.... :sweating:
Thats...for Judge CC to decide.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Father Ghostface on July 10, 2005, 10:26:51 PM
Oh my!  :o
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 11, 2005, 01:27:18 PM
I thought 1 was the worst...  *:stabs: Jar Jar* XD
Jar Jar is cool XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 11, 2005, 03:09:38 PM
It is unfair to make false accusations while the defendant is not present!
The Court would like to point out witnesses are not allowed to leave the stand (unless it's to eat) until the defendant has cross-questioned them or wavered his right to cross-question the witness. Therefor, he can prove statements (not accusations) unfounded. The statement, as it has been put forward at the beginning of this Court session, has not been altered, and has been acknowledged by the defendant.

Uh....I don't mean to melt the ice here but how exactly are you guys going to...make Raf play Big Rigs or watch Star Wars? Just a thought....

Thats...for Judge CC to decide.

Oh my!  :o
Watch it, or I'll have you removed from my Court room!

In that case, we'll make you play Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing (http://www.gamefaqs.com/computer/doswin/review/919220.html) 5 hours every day of the weekend. :evil:
Hmmm.. Anyway, it is not custom to debate about any sort of punishment until the defendant has been judged (and found guilty ofcourse). So, please leave that kind of talk be until this Court has passed such judgement, thank you. :scholar:
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 11, 2005, 04:29:40 PM
IF it even does...  8)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 11, 2005, 11:55:29 PM
I have no doubt that the court will come to a fair and true decision.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 13, 2005, 03:01:03 PM
IF it even does...  8)
The Court asks the defendant's lawyer to please refrain his client from making negative remarks on the capabilities of said Court.

EDIT: Oops! Almost forgot. ;]

Thank you, no further questions.
Does the defending party wish to cross-question the latest witness (Jafar)?
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 13, 2005, 05:29:44 PM
IF it even does...  8)
The Court asks the defendant's lawyer to please refrain his client from making negative remarks on the capabilities of said Court.

sorry your honor, but i meant that if it will ever HAVE to give out such a sentence  :-X

and... um.. go get 'em racx XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 15, 2005, 04:06:00 PM
sorry your honor, but i meant that if it will ever HAVE to give out such a sentence  :-X
When someone has filed a complaint with a Court, that Court is sworn to serve a sentence, unless both parties can come to an agreement outside of the Court after all. Usually, though, when filed with a court, all options to settle it without exterior help have been exhausted. 8)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 15, 2005, 04:11:03 PM
I've tried to settle it out of court. But Raf refuses to admit that he edited his posts, and I want the truth to be known.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 17, 2005, 01:57:56 PM
that i'm inocent? people already do XD :suffer:
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 18, 2005, 08:50:27 PM
I've tried to settle it out of court. But Raf refuses to admit that he edited his posts, and I want the truth to be known.
What does he got off with if he does admit to you, and you alone?
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 19, 2005, 10:17:32 AM
*tries to understand post* If Raf admits that he edited his posts to me, then it's still a confession. I would submit it as evidence. That said, if Raf has no questions for the current witness, I would like to call him to the stand.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 19, 2005, 09:01:04 PM
Bah, whatever!
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Shadowfax on July 20, 2005, 04:56:00 PM
Shadow's voice of reason.  :)

Since this is being taken so seriously by you lot; I will now throw in some heavyweight KQ IX forum banter philosophising based on a mixture of common sense and late night boredom. Do note that I am actually not having a go at anyone in this post. If this is a courtroom then there is going to be some good old fashioned slagging off. However, if you do feel you wish to take offence at this post....remember "It's just a game!"

1) You lot have wasted 10 pages of forum space on this madness? (If you can count electronic data as waste...well...you could say total electricity used to power your computers to post on this thread was a waste, what with dwindling natural resources. But then I have posted on this thread and wasted further resources anyway...hmmm.) Read below for why I think it is a waste!

2) The New OB has blatently posted stuff about Star Wars as when Princess R says words to the effect of "Sounds like a Star Wars thing..." right at the very beginning in reply to the New OB Star Wars sounding post, then the New OB says "Maybe." Judging by the tonge-in-cheek tone of the post (and the fact if you throw Pawadon through a search engine, you get Star Wars stuff) then it equates that he has been talking about it. So why in the name of Sporks and Foons is Princess R saying he is denying it? (Unless only she cannot see it?)

3) Even if the New OB denies (for some strange reason) that he never posted the Star Wars stuff (despite the fact his posts hinting at Star Wars are still up there) then what does it matter? Princess R know's she is right and thats the end of it! Its not as if we can actually force him to perform some punishment (not unless we virus-bomb his computer) and there is no way of proving he has carried it out anyway? Will any side get compensation...no...(and I hope no-one is seeking it either...too many people throw legal claims at poor souls for stupid sums of money over nothing; i.e. burglars making claims against the owners of the house they broke into, saying they hurt themselves whilst climbing through the window.) Is moral satisfaction wanted...proving to others in the forum that the New OB is lying...maybe (but whether anyone outside the Haven compound will care is another matter.)

Do you know what I say? Let the matter rest and let us all carry on with our daily lives! The sun will still rise and set, your loved ones will still be there, the sky will be blue, the grass will be (mostly) green (or some mottled colour pending on how well its been watered) and the one guarentee in life will always remain the same: You will never benefit from your life insurance policy.

Adios!  8)

BTW; I assume Raf has changed his name to "The New OB"...or am I going senile...again.  :(
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Father Ghostface on July 20, 2005, 09:39:00 PM
Wow, I couldn't understand a word of what I read.....good point though! The sky is very blue and the grass ugly! YAY UGLY! ON WITH THE TRIAL!  :D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Shadowfax on July 21, 2005, 07:32:51 AM
Errr...was I speaking in Japanese by accident?

The point I was actually trying to make was that I percieve the trial is pointless!  ;D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 21, 2005, 07:32:58 AM
Since this is being taken so seriously by you lot;
Huh? Seriously? Remember what section of the KQIX forums we're in? Everything in here is pure and utter madness, and you should treat it as such too. Remember that I am no real judge, just as Rosella is not a real lawyer, and neither is Racx. As far as I'm concerned, we're just re-enacting a real-life Court.

1) You lot have wasted 10 pages of forum space on this madness? (If you can count electronic data as waste...well...you could say total electricity used to power your computers to post on this thread was a waste, what with dwindling natural resources.
Once again, if you just browse around in this section, you're going to find a lot of forum space that just seems 'wasted' on meaningless posts. Heck, we even have a whole thread dedicated to that kind of stuff! :P I am well aware of the dwindling natural resources, which I why I turn off my pc, and tv at night, while many people just leave it on standby. My posting on this forum is meant at relaxing, and having a laugh, or at least just a smile. :D

2) The New OB has blatently posted stuff about Star Wars as when Princess R says words to the effect of "Sounds like a Star Wars thing..." right at the very beginning in reply to the New OB Star Wars sounding post, then the New OB says "Maybe." Judging by the tonge-in-cheek tone of the post (and the fact if you throw Pawadon through a search engine, you get Star Wars stuff) then it equates that he has been talking about it. So why in the name of Sporks and Foons is Princess R saying he is denying it? (Unless only she cannot see it?)
You missed the actual Charge, which is Raf denying he posted [size=0]Star Wars[/size]-stuff in a specific post, which has altered afterwards. Also note that in other threads, my 'relation' to Raf is entirely different from the one I'm having in here.

3) Even if the New OB denies (for some strange reason) that he never posted the Star Wars stuff (despite the fact his posts hinting at Star Wars are still up there) then what does it matter? Princess R know's she is right and thats the end of it! Its not as if we can actually force him to perform some punishment (not unless we virus-bomb his computer) and there is no way of proving he has carried it out anyway?
We can't? ::)

Do you know what I say? Let the matter rest and let us all carry on with our daily lives!
NEVER! Let the madness continue as long as it may! 8)

Having said that:

What does he got off with if he does admit to you, and you alone?
Please note that any questions by the defense lawyer to the accusing party will not be transcribed by the clerk and are completely off-record.

That said, if Raf has no questions for the current witness, I would like to call him to the stand.
Granted. However, I urge you to thread with extreme caution when questioning this witness because his lawyer will be watching you very closely and I would not want these Court proceedings be nullified because you made the slightest procedural misstep. Also, you cannot ask the defendant to acknowledge the fact directly whether or not he posted the thing this Court is here to decide.

PS :Jafar may leave the stand, if he has not done so already. 8)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Shadowfax on July 21, 2005, 07:38:57 AM
Sorry if the post sounded harsh, couldn't make it sound like I wasn't being sneering and mocking. I enjoy the madness as much as you lot!

Hmmm, well I did look at the very beginning of the thread and assumed that was where it all evolved from.

Even if that was the charge, your honour, I still say that there are better things to argue about; like why Spanish cleaners are so heroically lazy and why we are still living boring lives on earth when we were promised 40 odd years ago we would all be living in colonies on the moon/mars...

...(sigh)...still, if you wish the madness to continue, and enjoy it...well...good luck to ye!

 :)


Actually...just thinking...there IS a way you could prove he modified his posts....

Do you have a data logger on these forums logging everything that is said and done, including realtime post modifications?
If so, then proof can easily be found!

Thats my contribution over with!  8)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on July 21, 2005, 08:13:25 AM
why Spanish cleaners are so heroically lazy
Cesar's better at making messes than cleaning. XD
[BTW, please do not make racial comments like this in the future.]

Do you have a data logger on these forums logging everything that is said and done, including realtime post modifications?
If so, then proof can easily be found!
Sorry, we're too anti-spyware to do something like that. ;-D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Oldbushie on July 21, 2005, 06:13:41 PM
I used to wonder if the back and forward buttons for the internet browser let you go back and forth in time itself.... XD

Would be useful for checking posts pre-edit I suppose, but I don't think time-travel on the internet is doable yet. ;)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 22, 2005, 08:12:39 AM
Yeah that would be good proof XD

Although hes guilty anyway :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on July 22, 2005, 05:27:18 PM
but I don't think time-travel on the internet is doable yet. ;)
Google sometimes caches previous pages of websites, but I don't think they do that with forums too. :-\

Although hes guilty anyway :P
Weren't you the defendant's attorney? If so, does the defendant himself concur with your statement?

The Court would like to have it known the President of the Court will have other oblligations to attent to starting this Saturday and not ending before the next Saturday. Therefor, please don't expect him to pass judgement, or make any other decisions in that time period. The clerk however will stay at his/her post and make a transcript of everything that's said in this Court room (thread). However, in order not to make the President of the Court not lose too much time reading the transcripts afterwards, please limit your posting. The Court thanks you for your cooperation. 8)
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 22, 2005, 05:29:30 PM
In that case, I believe the questioning of the witness will be postponed until next Saturday.
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on July 22, 2005, 05:54:04 PM
Google sometimes caches previous pages of websites, but I don't think they do that with forums too. :-\
They could, but I ban search engine spiders from our forum. XD
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on July 23, 2005, 05:38:07 PM
Yeah that would be good proof XD

Although hes guilty anyway :P

<.< WHAT!!??
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 26, 2005, 08:37:35 AM
Someone edited that into my post, I would never say that ::) :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on July 26, 2005, 01:55:13 PM
You're a very bad person Jason :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 28, 2005, 02:53:11 AM
Ok ok, by someone I mean't me and by me I mean my other personality did it :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on July 28, 2005, 12:43:08 PM
Ok ok, by someone I mean't me and by me I mean my other personality did it :P
Is your other personality talking right now, or is it your other other one? ;P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 29, 2005, 10:15:49 AM
Is your other personality talking right now, or is it your other other one? ;P
Definitely my other other one ;D :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on July 30, 2005, 04:39:38 PM
What the HECK are you all going on about?!?
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on July 30, 2005, 04:55:24 PM
Don't try to understand.

By the way, if this trial doesn't get more exciting soon, I'm going to find something else to do.

And that's a thread, because I'm still duct taped to the evidence table. :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on July 30, 2005, 05:01:22 PM
Don't try to understand.

Hmm...well, if you need a reliable lawyer who might actually make headway on this case, give me a call and fill me in. *Hands card to whoever is in charge*  ;D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on July 30, 2005, 10:17:14 PM
What the HECK are you all going on about?!?
Well I was also an asylum patient, and I had multiple personality disorder :D

There was one point when I had arguments with myself on the forum ::) :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 02, 2005, 06:26:26 PM
Hmm...well, if you need a reliable lawyer who might actually make headway on this case, give me a call and fill me in. *Hands card to whoever is in charge*  ;D
Well, I'm the one in charge, technically speaking, of the Court in any case, but I have no use for a lawyer's business card. However, you have my permission to hand it out in the audience, as long as you don't disrupt the proceedings.

Well I was also an asylum patient, and I had multiple personality disorder :D
Indeed, as Manager of the Asylum I can attest to that. :scholar:

The President of the Jury is back, has reviewed the clerk's papers, and would like tot thank everyone for keeping the new posts as little as possible. Let it be known that my time on the forum these days is also seriously limited to real-life work-matters. The proceedings can proceed though. (two 'proceed's' in one sentence, is that grammatically authorized?) 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on August 02, 2005, 08:36:19 PM
I'm more interested in why Jason said "was" :P In any case, Raf, do you remember the logs in reply #136 are true and have not been edited or falsified in any way?
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on August 02, 2005, 09:30:45 PM
Hmm...well, if you need a reliable lawyer who might actually make headway on this case, give me a call and fill me in. *Hands card to whoever is in charge*  ;D
Well, I'm the one in charge, technically speaking, of the Court in any case, but I have no use for a lawyer's business card. However, you have my permission to hand it out in the audience, as long as you don't disrupt the proceedings.

Hmm...you are omnipotent aren't you? Very well. *Hands cards to members of the audience quietly and observes case*
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on August 03, 2005, 08:17:48 AM
Wait!!  Can I get a card to?  I'm sure CC won't mind if you just come up and give one to the Q on the evidence table! :D
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 03, 2005, 06:41:27 PM
Hmm...you are omnipotent aren't you?
No, that was quite some time agao, when I was an "Omnipotent Being", Now I'm (just) a "KQ9 Groupie". 8)

Wait!!  Can I get a card to?  I'm sure CC won't mind if you just come up and give one to the Q on the evidence table! :D
Why do you need a card if you consider yourself evidence? Are you seeking counsel concerning the upcoming case about your extinction maybe? :pokerface:
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on August 03, 2005, 08:33:26 PM
Wait!!  Can I get a card to?  I'm sure CC won't mind if you just come up and give one to the Q on the evidence table! :D
Why do you need a card if you consider yourself evidence? Are you seeking counsel concerning the upcoming case about your extinction maybe? :pokerface:
Maybe hes trying to change/manipulate the evidence ::) :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 04, 2005, 05:50:46 PM
Maybe hes trying to change/manipulate the evidence ::) :P
Don't worry, the evidence table is closely watched by Court personnel. :scholar:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on August 05, 2005, 07:01:52 PM
Wait!!  Can I get a card to?  I'm sure CC won't mind if you just come up and give one to the Q on the evidence table! :D

Sure you can have my card. I think you need it.  ;)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on August 06, 2005, 03:02:29 AM
If Q thinks hes evidence then maybe he needs more treatment in the asylum, and maybe more attention :D :P
Title: Re:Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on August 06, 2005, 07:20:28 PM
Hmm...you are omnipotent aren't you?
No, that was quite some time agao, when I was an "Omnipotent Being", Now I'm (just) a "KQ9 Groupie". 8)

Ha ha.  :P

Yeah...Questie probably needs special treatment...I'll look into that...
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 07, 2005, 05:20:40 PM
If Q thinks hes evidence then maybe he needs more treatment in the asylum, and maybe more attention :D :P
The Court would once more like to have it known Q's fate is not on trial here (at the moment) and therefor should not be discussed, thank you.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 08, 2005, 04:12:44 PM
Would the current witness please answer the question quoted below in order for these proceedings to get a move on?

I'm more interested in why Jason said "was" :P In any case, Raf, do you remember the logs in reply #136 are true and have not been edited or falsified in any way?
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on August 09, 2005, 11:00:30 AM
The Court would once more like to have it known Q's fate is not on trial here (at the moment) and therefor should not be discussed, thank you.
But its for the best of his sanity, if we don't bring the problem up now it could get worse :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 09, 2005, 05:24:41 PM
But its for the best of his sanity, if we don't bring the problem up now it could get worse :P
If the Court remembers correctly, Q is being treated for his insanity in 'The Asylum (c)', henceforth discussing it should be limited to that thread. :pokerface:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on August 09, 2005, 10:45:09 PM
If the Court remembers correctly, Q is being treated for his insanity in 'The Asylum (c)', henceforth discussing it should be limited to that thread. :pokerface:
Yes but in this thread he thinks hes evidence, so I brought it to your attention so that he could receive extra treatment in 'The Asylum ©' XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 10, 2005, 05:19:56 PM
Yes but in this thread he thinks hes evidence, so I brought it to your attention so that he could receive extra treatment in 'The Asylum ©' XD
The Court is confident the treatment at 'The Asylum ©' is perfectly suited to Q's mental condition.
PS: Remember: 'The Court' <> 'The Manager of the KQ IX Asylum ©'

Notice: Court proceedings have been suspended due to the disappearing act of the witness and will resume as soon as he shows up again. Thank you for your patience.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on August 11, 2005, 09:38:51 AM
Anyway I just thought, seeing that he thinks hes evidence, that maybe he needs more treatment :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on August 13, 2005, 11:41:19 PM
Been so long that i cant remember the event  :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on August 14, 2005, 12:03:59 PM
*glares at Raf* ;P

So, if you do not admit to that conversation... Why did you edit your posts after my seizure? Obviously, the posts were edited, though the court is to decide from what. I'd just like to know if they were typos or something. :angel:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 14, 2005, 03:11:45 PM
Why did you edit your posts after my seizure? Obviously, the posts were edited, though the court is to decide from what. I'd just like to know if they were typos or something. :angel:
Warning: please cease this line of questioning. I will permit this one question, but that's as far as it goes.
Notice: Court proceedings have resumed.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on August 14, 2005, 09:20:41 PM
Er, I'm sorry your Honor. *hides from the bold*
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 15, 2005, 03:05:21 PM
Er, I'm sorry your Honor. *hides from the bold*
You need not hide from the bold. That typeface is just used to differentiate when the Court is speaking, and when I'm speaking on my own behalf and accord. ;) Having said that...

The court wishes to remind the prosecuting side of the warning I issued when I approved calling the defendant to the stand:

Also, you cannot ask the defendant to acknowledge the fact directly whether or not he posted the thing this Court is here to decide.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on August 15, 2005, 05:41:52 PM
Well, assuming he's telling the truth, it would simply be a typo or something.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on August 16, 2005, 06:05:12 PM
I would just like to clarify a few things.....

-I do not *think* I am evidence.  I am on the evidence table (duct taped to it even!), so I therefore KNOW that I am evidence.  It is an undeniable fact.

-I just like business cards.  Not as much as say, clicky pens, or those bells that you hit the button on the top and they ring.  But I do like them.  Because you can hide them in your sleeve and then when you shake someone's hand, have it slide into the palm of your hand so you are cleverly handing them your card.  Not enough people do that!

-I think I am being treated perfectly well in the asylum, except for this ridiculous thing about not letting me have clicky pens and bells.  And now CC doesn't even want me having business cards!  No more treatment is necessary!

-Since the evidence cannot speak for itself, but must be interpreted by the lawyers, I shall now commence my interpretive dance.
>wriggles around in the duct tape< (Note: this dance can be interpreted as all that I've said above and also this: "Raf says he'll buy Kelsey a cookie factory if she drops the case"...but only if the lawyers are any good. :P)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 17, 2005, 02:35:12 PM
Well, assuming he's telling the truth, it would simply be a typo or something.
The Court told you the question you asked, was allowed, but that line of questioning would have to be limited to that one question.

-I think I am being treated perfectly well in the asylum, except for this ridiculous thing about not letting me have clicky pens and bells.  And now CC doesn't even want me having business cards!  No more treatment is necessary!
Quote the Court where it said you could not, (ever) get a business card, period.

-Since the evidence cannot speak for itself, but must be interpreted by the lawyers, I shall now commence my interpretive dance.
>wriggles around in the duct tape< (Note: this dance can be interpreted as all that I've said above and also this: "Raf says he'll buy Kelsey a cookie factory if she drops the case"...but only if the lawyers are any good. :P)
Huh? Attempts at BRIBERY? :pokerface:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on August 17, 2005, 07:21:31 PM

Huih? Attempts at BRIBERY? :pokerface:

.....well, I don't need a credit card.  BUSINESS CARDS!!!

And you know, I never SAID anything about bribery.  That's just YOUR interpretation -- and you're the judge.  It's up to the lawyers and the jury to interpret the evidence.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 18, 2005, 02:40:08 PM
.....well, I don't need a credit card.  BUSINESS CARDS!!!
Excuse-a-me, I seem to have mistyped a word. :-\ Let me modify the question in just a sec...

And you know, I never SAID anything about bribery.  That's just YOUR interpretation -- and you're the judge.  It's up to the lawyers and the jury to interpret the evidence.
The Court was just clarifying what was at stake in your explanation of your dance. That's also why the Court said attempt. 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 23, 2005, 02:30:51 PM
/me wonders where the witness has wandered off to this time

PS: Darn, I can't get the title in bold. :-X
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on August 24, 2005, 12:40:42 AM
Well, you could type the whole thing out the normal way. :P

* The Court wonders where the witness has wandered off to this time ???
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 24, 2005, 01:59:03 PM
Well, you could type the whole thing out the normal way. :P
I was just testing to see what the / me function was capable of. Ofcourse it can be done the normal way, but that was not the intention of the test. 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on August 24, 2005, 02:13:25 PM
There's a / me function? :o XD

/me marvels XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on August 24, 2005, 08:45:12 PM
/me knows that there's a bit more to the /me function then the average poster knows. :scholar:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on August 26, 2005, 01:15:29 AM
/me the insane freak knows not what Jafar is talking about
 XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 26, 2005, 03:24:58 PM
/me knows that there's a bit more to the /me function then the average poster knows. :scholar:
/me would like this matter to be discussed outside of the Court room, thank you. 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on August 27, 2005, 12:51:07 PM
>wriggles around in the duct tape<

let me see, he´s trying to tell us that... um.. ino... yes... Raforever is inocent and... um.. card.. um... want... AH... he wants to give Kels another buisness card  ::)


where were we? AH yes typo thats the thing BIG typo

/me typos alot XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on August 27, 2005, 04:41:01 PM
let me see, he´s trying to tell us that... um.. ino... yes... Raforever is inocent and... um.. card.. um... want... AH... he wants to give Kels another buisness card  ::)
The evidence has no authority on the guilty/innocent status of a defendant. And I would think that piece of evidence would well know what it is trying to convey itself, without you trying to (mis)interpret it. He wants]to give a business card? I thought he was collecting them. ::)

where were we? AH yes typo thats the thing BIG typo

/me typos alot XD
The Court would like to know what kind of typo the defendant/witness was correcting.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 04, 2005, 06:33:42 AM
Why don't we just convict Raforever and start with Q's case? I am actually starting to pity him. (I know I can't believe it either)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 04, 2005, 10:03:35 AM
Why don't we just convict Raforever and start with Q's case? I am actually starting to pity him. (I know I can't believe it either)
Q has a case :o, I thought he was just evidence that got thrown out after the trial XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 04, 2005, 11:08:36 AM
Nah, he just figured that this case needed evidenciary support. It was also a plea for sympathy and at this rate (now that he has duck tapwed himself to the evidence table) he should get more sympathy for his case (where I would like to represent him as my client and as his lawyer) then he would otherwise have gotten. His case, to save his species of "Q's". Prhaps he would object to the hunting of Q's or merely to attract sympathy and offer Q's more jobs. I now ask the court for their verdict as Q's case is very pressing.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 04, 2005, 11:31:10 AM
Convicting Raf sounds good to me. ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 04, 2005, 01:11:40 PM
Sounds great to me to. I know let's have a vote since the verdict is taking too long to get. All in favour of convicting Raf please fill out these ballots. *Gives out ballots* Alright all in favour of not convicting Raf fill out these ballots. Please post your vote.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 04, 2005, 01:59:50 PM
Sorry but this is a court not a federal election :P

This case will proceed until the jury comes to a verdict or Bob comes to a decision :D

Now please be seated 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 04, 2005, 02:08:50 PM
Who's the jury again?
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 04, 2005, 02:10:37 PM
Anyone that Bob said couldn't be on the jury XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 04, 2005, 02:11:29 PM
Really? Awesome! XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 04, 2005, 02:14:18 PM
He has trouble saying what he means, and generally tends to say the opposite of what hes thinking XD

Like locking us up in the asylum, he actually meant let them free XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 04, 2005, 02:16:13 PM
Well, he's insane. You really can't blame him. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 04, 2005, 02:17:41 PM
Yeah I guess so :-\, but I will blame him just for the fun of it XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 04, 2005, 02:48:49 PM
Alright fine, no ballots. Could Judge Bob hurry up then? Or how about the jury just giving the verdict without him present? If Judge Bob doesn't hurry up we might have to get Judge Judy to reach a decision for him.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 04, 2005, 07:46:44 PM
Quote
we might have to get Judge Judy to reach a decision for him.
Are you crazy? She'll murderlize Raf! :o
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 05, 2005, 03:19:43 AM
That's what I want! He's guilty. And besides, the faster she mutilates him, the quicker we can get to Q's case. Who is the DA for this case anyway?
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 05, 2005, 08:45:59 AM
You'll have to mutilate me first, I ain't lettin' ya just go and kill Raf
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 05, 2005, 09:04:53 AM
Can't we get a slightly nicer judge? Judge Judy will eat us all for breakfast, and come back for seconds! :(
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 05, 2005, 09:12:36 AM
I know this really nice judge :D, really friendly

His name is CC :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 05, 2005, 09:13:34 AM
You know what? Thats a great idea! Why didn't I think of that? ::)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 05, 2005, 09:46:52 AM
You're so busy with the resistance that you haven't had enough rest, and now its starting to get to you :P, maybe you should rest :)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 05, 2005, 09:49:52 AM
I don't know...if I let my guard down, they might kidnap me or something. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 05, 2005, 10:03:10 AM
Nah they tend to have a liking for me :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 05, 2005, 10:05:15 AM
I'm the leader, though. I'm the most valuable to the Resistance, so it's only logical that they'd try to get me sometimes. ::)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 05, 2005, 10:23:36 AM
Yeah, they've already tried to get me. It's only logical that Jafar's next. ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 05, 2005, 10:48:34 AM
I say Bob is next :P, he has a "fragile" mind ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 05, 2005, 10:52:12 AM
Well, wake me up when Bob gets back and the court continues.
/me falls asleep...with one eye open ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 05, 2005, 11:08:18 AM
Ok will do

*Pokes Jafar's open eye* :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Oldbushie on September 05, 2005, 11:37:14 AM
*bakes cookies for the jury*  :D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 05, 2005, 11:55:15 AM
*Makes Seafood Noodle Soup for the jury and audience*
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 05, 2005, 12:34:34 PM
You'll have to mutilate me first, I ain't lettin' ya just go and kill Raf
I don't want to kill Raf (you are very paranoid), all I want to do is prove his guilt and start with Q's case. Judge Judy will take care of Raf for me.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on September 06, 2005, 02:19:22 PM
He has trouble saying what he means, and generally tends to say the opposite of what hes thinking XD
Excuse me?  ::) The Court seems to have forgetten where she said who could not be on the jury. Where did she say that?

Could Judge Bob hurry up then? Or how about the jury just giving the verdict without him present?
The procedure requires the Court to read out the verdict. Until/unless I hear from the president of the Jury informing the Court they have reached a verdict, I can not read anything out loud.

Who is the DA for this case anyway?
The DA for this case is Rosella.

I say Bob is next :P, he has a "fragile" mind ;P
My mind has its flaws, I can agree to that, but prone to infection by them is not one of them.

Well, wake me up when Bob gets back and the court continues.
THE COURT IS BACK IN SESSION

all I want to do is prove his guilt and start with Q's case.
You are not the prosecutor in this case, so it is not your job to prove or disprove Raf's (supposed) guilt. The Court concurs with Q's lawyer though, that this case needs closure.

/me asks the president of the Jury if they have reached a verdict yet.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 07, 2005, 04:42:27 AM
The president of the jury has probably not reached a verdict because no one has answered. Therefore I ask the judge to make the verdict
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 07, 2005, 04:55:57 AM
Who IS the Jury? (Including the president)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on September 07, 2005, 03:09:53 PM
The president of the jury has probably not reached a verdict because no one has answered. Therefore I ask the judge to make the verdict.
a) You are not involved in this here trial. You are only here as audience, nothing mere.
b) The Court cannot just make a verdict ouf of thin air. If that were the case, we wouldn't have had need of a jury anyway.
Therefor, your request is invalid.


Who IS the Jury? (Including the president)

The court finds the defendant...GUILTY! Raf is sentenced to 3 days in the dishwashing mines. Court Dismissed!
And where did you suddenly come from? I'm the Court around here! However, you can be president of the Jury.
Does this answer your question? And ofcourse, it's the president's responsibility to make up his 'team' here. The Court's only link is to the President.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 07, 2005, 09:37:26 PM
I say Bob is next :P, he has a "fragile" mind ;P
My mind has its flaws, I can agree to that, but prone to infection by them is not one of them.
Sorry they're making me act strange, I'm slowly getting rid of them happily though, I think :D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 07, 2005, 09:38:54 PM
YAY! YAY for RACX!

You all need some more Seafood Noodle Soup, you look very stressed out. I'll make some more for the court.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 07, 2005, 10:13:04 PM
Quote
Does this answer your question?
Er, whoops. Slipped my mind. ::)
*Starts thinking of who to put on the Jury*
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 07, 2005, 10:28:02 PM
I suggest sending out jury duty notices to infrequent posters or long absent dedicated posters.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 08, 2005, 04:49:59 AM
Nothing that draws people more to a forum than jury duty. ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 08, 2005, 12:50:18 PM
Ahem. Could we please get the court back in session. I am eager to start with Q's case and after 15+ pages this case should really end eventually. Meaning no disrespect to either the (definitely guilty, in my opinion) Raforever or to the Almighty  Princess Rosella. As for the jury please hurry Jafar.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 08, 2005, 01:23:38 PM
Alright, I've made my decision. The members added to the Jury are

Lolotte
Bushie
Cat
And LN

I trust in their judgment. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 08, 2005, 02:44:42 PM
Good. Does the jury a.k.a
Cat
Bushie
Lolotte
LN
Jafar
Have a verdict yet?
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: koko_99_2001 on September 08, 2005, 07:08:25 PM
Umm...I actually haven't been following...
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 08, 2005, 07:25:24 PM
Don't worry, just read through the thread when you have some spare time, and give it your best judgment. You'll do fine! ;D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 08, 2005, 10:26:10 PM
I'll help Cat decide ;)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 10, 2005, 03:49:00 PM
The jury is in the process of deliberating. Please be patient, and we'll arrive at a verdict as soon as possible. Thank you.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on September 11, 2005, 11:11:55 AM
Nothing that draws people more to a forum than jury duty. ;P
If I were a team member of some sorts, I could've had some leverage to persuade them. :evil:

Ahem. Could we please get the court back in session. I am eager to start with Q's case and after 15+ pages this case should really end eventually.
The Court has a hunch Q's case will not take 15+ pages as it thinks nobody will be questioning your case.

Meaning no disrespect to either the (definitely guilty, in my opinion) Raforever or to the Almighty  Princess Rosella.
Whilst you are entitled to your own opinion you are still not involved in this case so please do not try to influence the Jury. Also, apart from disrespect to the defendant and the prosecutor, please refrain from disrepecting The Court too, if you would.

I'll help Cat decide ;)
For the Jury to reach a fair and honest verdict I cannot allow influence from anyone outside of the Jury now. They must come clean with their own conscience so if I catch you anywhere near the Jury chambers this Court will have the bailiff (?) hold you into custody until the Jury has reached its verdict.

The jury is in the process of deliberating. Please be patient, and we'll arrive at a verdict as soon as possible. Thank you.
Further instructions as to make sure this case follows procedure:
If you would be so kind as to announce your departure from the Jury chambers (and only that), that would be greatly appreciated. Then you must wait until The Court asks The President of the Jury to read out the verdict. After that is done one of the Court Aides will come and collect the verdict and bring it to The Court to review and confirm. If/When the Court confirms the verdict, only then is this Case over.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 11, 2005, 06:51:40 PM
For the Jury to reach a fair and honest verdict I cannot allow influence from anyone outside of the Jury now. They must come clean with their own conscience so if I catch you anywhere near the Jury chambers this Court will have the bailiff (?) hold you into custody until the Jury has reached its verdict.
Well then someone needs to bring her upto date on what has happened so far :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 11, 2005, 07:27:09 PM
EXTRA! EXTRA!

The jury has finally reached its verdict. We have unanimously voted Raforever GUILTY. However, we have agreed that the punishment should be decided in open discussion with the court and judge. Thank you for your patience!

Love, The Jury

Lollotte
Cat
LN
Oldbushie
Jafar
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 11, 2005, 07:29:36 PM
Isn't the President of the Jury supposed to say this. And AFTER the Court asks for the verdict? In fact, Jafar isn't mentioned at all. I agree with the verdict, but if something's wrong here.... :pokerface:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 11, 2005, 08:08:16 PM
Well, we don't really have a president of the Jury. I just posted it because it was most convenient for me to do so. We have been deliberating via private messages (just in case you were curious  ;D)...What's on your mind?

PS: Whoops! Forgot Jafar! I added him to the list.  :-[
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 11, 2005, 08:13:01 PM
I never got any of these private messages :pokerface:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 11, 2005, 08:19:30 PM
Yeah, well, you were not a jury member!
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 11, 2005, 08:20:30 PM
Ok, thats a good point :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 11, 2005, 08:36:54 PM
It's ture. As President of the Jury, I can confirm this. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 11, 2005, 08:41:05 PM
Thank you, Jafar!  ;D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 11, 2005, 08:44:27 PM
Anything, for Truth, Justice, and the Vitamin C way! ;D

Although Kels is right, we made a bit of a mistake saying the verdict too early...oh well. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 11, 2005, 08:45:53 PM
It doesn't matter. CC wasn't here to ask for it from us, anyways.  :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 11, 2005, 08:48:53 PM
Bob may not approve but meh, he'll get over it XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 11, 2005, 09:15:51 PM
It'll be good for him. He needs a bit of excitement from time to time in this court. Right, CC?  :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 12, 2005, 04:51:27 AM
So, this being the official verdict... Raf's guilty! !!! Raf, now that you've been officially proven guilty, I think you should at least confess (for the third time.) :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 12, 2005, 01:14:27 PM
Great! Raf's guilty! Q is no longer in danger of extinction since Raf is going to prison (or the dishwashing mines) and therefore his case must not further trouble this courtroom. If Mr.Q would kindly remove himself from the evidence table, then we can celebrate.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on September 12, 2005, 03:18:45 PM
Well, we don't really have a president of the Jury.
Yes, you DO!

Isn't the President of the Jury supposed to say this. And AFTER the Court asks for the verdict?
Yes, they SHOULD!

It doesn't matter. CC wasn't here to ask for it from us, anyways.
Don't you dare talk like that about me after that stunt you just pulled! :furious:

It's ture. As President of the Jury, I can confirm this.
/me  sends over an aide to pick up the verdict and can confirm Raf has been found GUILTY

It'll be good for him. He needs a bit of excitement from time to time in this court. Right, CC?  :P
Excitement is not a word I'd use in this case. Disregard for the Court, not following procedure... :bomb: I have just this one more thing to say to you: YOU WILL NOT SERVE IN A JURY EVERY AGAIN!

Great! Raf's guilty! Q is no longer in danger of extinction since Raf is going to prison (or the dishwashing mines) and therefore his case must not further trouble this courtroom.
Please explain how Raf being found guilty has any relevance to Mr. Q's extinction. ???

PS: In regard to the comments directed at Lollotte's behavior, they were purely in my function as President of the Court and should not be viewed as a personal attack of any sorts. Thank you for your understanding. 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 12, 2005, 08:24:16 PM
Yikes! He broke the judge hammer thingy! :o
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 12, 2005, 08:27:38 PM
He sure did. But that's okay. Like I said, it is not the end of the world, and besides, jury duty is super time consuming. I need to do homework, after all! The main thing is, this case has run its course. Now all CC has to say is "case closed!"  ;D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 13, 2005, 12:04:29 AM
"Case Closed!"

I just had to be first :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 13, 2005, 04:57:08 AM
XD We still have to sentence Raf, ya know. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. KQIX Forum
Post by: Deloria on September 13, 2005, 04:59:36 AM
Your Honor, If one looks through this thread, (Page 6 I think) one can see that Raf threatened my client. That proves that my client's specie's extinction would have in fact, been brought on by Raf himself, my client being the only member of his specie.

I now present Exhibit A:
[quote/]
This rare specie is in risk of extiction due to this mindless accusation against my person.
[/quote]
I can quote Raf on this and I beg your honor, to extend his sentance, which has not yet been announced.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 13, 2005, 05:13:58 AM
Actually, this says that Q is about to go extinct because I sued Raf, not because of anything he did. In this quote, Raf seemed to be trying to make us aware on the pressing issue of Q extinction, not threaten Q. Though I am on the opposing party as Raf in the current trial, if you blame Raf for the current state of Q's, then I feel you would not be on the right track. In fact, if you were to do that, I might offer to be his lawyer, free of charge.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 13, 2005, 02:58:58 PM
Inadvertedly, yes because you sued Raf, but Raf says my client is risking extinction (due to the fact that you sued him) and Q agreed that he thought Raf guilty aswell. By voiceing his oppinion, he put himself at risk. Raf also added insult to his threat, saying that Q was mindless, or off track. I must counter that this can be seen as a threat. I assumed that Raf, having already represented himself in the case against you, would be his own lawyer, but by all means represent him if you are like the case that much that you would be willing to do it free of charge.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 13, 2005, 03:07:39 PM
By the time the court became truly formal, Raf had a lawyer, Jason. I'd also like to point out that Q WAS off track.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 13, 2005, 03:12:28 PM
Very true. I never did understand his point in wanting business cards, or duck-taping himself to the evidence table other than to make a statement.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on September 13, 2005, 03:16:12 PM
Yikes! He broke the judge hammer thingy! :o
Not to worry, there's more where that came from!
/me opens up a drawer and pulls out another hammer thingy.

He sure did. But that's okay. Like I said, it is not the end of the world, and besides, jury duty is super time consuming. I need to do homework, after all!
It's not the end of the world, but this trial is drawing near to its end. You could just have announced your departure from the closed chambers, and then you could have gone and do your homework, because the reading of the verdict had to be done by the President.

"Case Closed!"

I just had to be first :P
I can't stop you from saying that, with free speech and all, but that doesn't mean anyone has to act accordingly.

XD We still have to sentence Raf, ya know. :P
I believe sentencing has been done, at least partly. However, we have yet to determine Raf's punishment, and I guess that's what you meant. If these were murder trials, the prosecutor and the defendant would again have to plea to the Jury but since this is not the case, The Court and the Jury must retire to closed chambers to discuss this.

In fact, if you were to do that, I might offer to be his lawyer, free of charge.

I assumed that Raf, having already represented himself in the case against you, would be his own lawyer, but by all means represent him if you are like the case that much that you would be willing to do it free of charge.
Do I smell a 'Raf vs Q' case coming on? :P

By the time the court became truly formal, Raf had a lawyer, Jason. I'd also like to point out that Q WAS off track.
Different cases can warrant different lawyers. :idea:

Now, if you will excuse me, punishment needs to be determined.
/me motions the members of the Jury to follow him into closed chambers.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 13, 2005, 03:19:45 PM
Pssst. The "Hammer-thingy" is called a gavel.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 13, 2005, 07:19:54 PM
I know what it's called, but hammer thingy sounds SO much better. :suffer:

/me follows CC into the chambers of closed-ness with the rest of the Jury
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on September 13, 2005, 09:09:08 PM
Sadly, neither Raf nor Q are here at the moment to perpetuate this "Raf v. Q" case. Actually, that might be a good thing... :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on September 13, 2005, 11:47:06 PM
There can't be a case in which I am anything but evidence.  Because I am duct taped to the evidence table.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 13, 2005, 11:51:47 PM
That can be fixed... :evil:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on September 13, 2005, 11:52:35 PM
Jafar, if you do what I think you're doing...Q's won't be endangered -- we'll be extinct!
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 14, 2005, 02:27:05 AM
I can also help with the "fixing"

*grabs his metal bat of eternal pain* :evil:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 14, 2005, 12:27:06 PM
Okay fine, could CC please hit the hammer thingy? And "fixing" my client won't be necessary Racx. Q, I am here to prevent your exctinction or your being endangered. And I'd like to remind Jafar that violence usually isn't tolerated in courtrooms. BTW, would SOMEBODY please cut Q loose (without using force)?When will the court be in session, for Q vs. Raf?   
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on September 14, 2005, 01:37:29 PM
Okay fine, could CC please hit the hammer thingy?
/me informs Deloria the President of the Court is currently in closed session with the rest of the jury and thus cannot hit the hammer thingy in the Court room.

And I'd like to remind Jafar that violence usually isn't tolerated in courtrooms. BTW, would SOMEBODY please cut Q loose (without using force)?
Even though the President is not here, there's still enough Court personnel in the Court room to ensure everyone's safety, including Q's. It isn't just a case of cutting loose Q though, he's been stuck to that evidence table so long that won't do it. We're going to have to use selective dissolvents. 8)

When will the court be in session, for Q vs. Raf?
When the current case has been formally closed of course, which will be after Raf's punishment has been announced.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 14, 2005, 02:42:42 PM
*assumes Bob is going back to the closed chambers*
* Get's some solvents and gets someone to remove her client from the evidence desk.*
*decides to stop using stars*

Can I even hand-pick Jury members for this case?
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 14, 2005, 02:46:52 PM
Isn't the point of the jury that it's supposed to be unbiased? If you picked them, you'd most likely pick people who would rule your way. So, not trying to answer for the court, but I'd assume the answer would be a very large no.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 14, 2005, 02:51:22 PM
In some special cases one can, but I think the court makes sure they are neutral beforehand.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Louisiana Night on September 14, 2005, 04:50:09 PM
Isn't the point of the jury that it's supposed to be unbiased?

Considering I was a witness(and a jury member)... I wouldn't say so. ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 14, 2005, 06:24:04 PM
My client has done nothing wrong and will not be facing another courtcase!
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 15, 2005, 06:16:29 AM
If he did nothing wrong then why is he considered guilty? And Rosella has consented to take 'your' client as her client for free. 
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 15, 2005, 01:44:14 PM
He's done nothing wrong in relation to the Q case. I have consented to take Raf as my client for free (considering I represented myself and won, while Jason represented him and lost, :P) however, if Raf would like to stay with Jason, should a case ever present itself, I can't force him to do anything. And until this trial is officially concluded, Raf is still Jason's client.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 15, 2005, 02:13:19 PM
He can't have done anything wrong in relation to Q's case since it hasn't started yet.  In general he has lost the trial (Rosella v. Raf), and after sentancing him the case can start. How high is bail, anyway?
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on September 15, 2005, 02:20:10 PM
*assumes Bob is going back to the closed chambers*
* Get's some solvents and gets someone to remove her client from the evidence desk.*
The President of the Court has never left closed chambers, at least not by the door leading to the Court room. By the door leading to the restrooms on the other hand... ;-D
However, as stated before, there's still Court personel at hand so you needn't get those solvents, we have a closet full of different types ourselves.

Can I even hand-pick Jury members for this case?

In some special cases one can, but I think the court makes sure they are neutral beforehand.
The President of the Court picks the president of the Jury, which then picks the jury members. If The Court, the prosecutor or the defendant objects to any member the president of the Jury picked, it must be replaced. Neither the Court, the prosecutor, nor the defendant can pick (normal) jury members. :scholar:

My client has done nothing wrong and will not be facing another courtcase!
If your client is charged with a felony he has no choice but to face another trial, or the trial will be over switfly, and with only one possible outcome: GUILTY. Who he will be represented by in that case, is entirely up to him.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 15, 2005, 07:19:29 PM
(considering I represented myself and won, while Jason represented him and lost, :P)
I have a reason, I have trouble protecting someone who is guilty. In this case I would help my client win because he has done nothing wrong in anyway to endanger Q or Q's species XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 16, 2005, 11:24:50 AM
No one ever answered my question, How high is bail? (just out of interest)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 16, 2005, 01:34:07 PM
*takes a deep breath*
Ok, this whole trial is a civil case. There is no bail AT ALL in a civil case. And even if this had been a criminal case, bail would be set at the beginning, to keep him out of a holding cell, and yet make him show up for trial. After sentencing, it's not as if you could pay to get someone out of jail. :P In this case, I filed my complaint (sorta :P) and we had a trial. The jury (which is sometimes a part of civil cases,) decided on a verdict. And now, the court has to decide on the sentence (usually a fine of some sort.) Raf wouldn't be sent to jail for a civil case, so he actually spends NO time in jail before, or after the trial. :scholar:
Oh yeah! Who ALMOST paid attention in Civics!?
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on September 16, 2005, 04:54:17 PM
Oh yeah! Who ALMOST paid attention in Civics!?
Very good. No wonder you won this trial. You know the ins and outs of this type of Court. :yes:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 16, 2005, 05:45:43 PM
Yay. :D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on September 17, 2005, 11:52:59 PM
whats going on here?  ??? ??? ???
whats this about Q?

is it over all ready.....

what did i do this time?  :o
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 18, 2005, 01:31:46 AM
You did nothing, thats why we'll take this case on and win :D

Now just don't say anything that they can twist and use in their defence ;)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on September 18, 2005, 11:47:58 AM
what did i do this time?  :o
You were found guilty since you went AFF without warning and sentenced to death. :)

(j/k XD, but the part about you being found guilty is true :P)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on September 18, 2005, 03:08:22 PM
You did nothing, thats why we'll take this case on and win :D

Now just don't say anything that they can twist and use in their defence ;)
It has not been decided yet that it is you who will be representing Raf in that case. And since Rosella's track record is better than yours... ::)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 18, 2005, 06:59:27 PM
It has not been decided yet that it is you who will be representing Raf in that case. And since Rosella's track record is better than yours... ::)
Raf can fire me but now that I am a Jarada Knight I am devoted to protecting him :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 19, 2005, 03:06:11 PM
Is a 'Jarada Knight' realated to Star Wars? CC, if you're back the jury must have reached a verdict. I never understood anything about bail anyway, thanks for clearing it up. 
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 19, 2005, 06:58:00 PM
Is a 'Jarada Knight' realated to Star Wars?
Nope, has nothing to do with Star Wars
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 19, 2005, 07:09:22 PM
If it did, I'd sue them ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 19, 2005, 08:13:12 PM
Yup and one could just copy the answers word for word from previous pages, and Rosella would win again, and Racx would be sentanced to the same thing Jafar is being sentanced to (which is WHAT?)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 19, 2005, 09:52:00 PM
Yup and one could just copy the answers word for word from previous pages, and Rosella would win again, and Racx would be sentanced to the same thing Jafar is being sentanced to (which is WHAT?)
When did Jafar get sentenced? XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on September 19, 2005, 10:03:10 PM
Jafar's president of the jury! He can't get sentenced! XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 20, 2005, 04:52:32 AM
Sorry I meant Raf.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on September 20, 2005, 05:34:25 AM
Thats okay. Us Jarada Knights are easilly confused. ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on September 20, 2005, 08:52:02 AM
Thats okay. Us Jarada Knights are easilly confused. ;P
I'll take that as a deliberate typo :P XD

Yup and one could just copy the answers word for word from previous pages, and Rosella would win again, and Racx would be sentanced to the same thing Jafar is being sentanced to (which is WHAT?)
Raf was accused of saying padawan in Rosella's thread, and she declared that no one was allowed to make references to Star Wars in her thread, therefore this case arised XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on September 20, 2005, 11:02:00 AM
but before the case arose it was surely legal, Rosella not saying anything about SW until after Raf had said the word 'padawon'
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on September 20, 2005, 02:00:20 PM
CC, if you're back the jury must have reached a verdict.
When my text is not in bold, I'm not the President of the Court. Furthermore, the typeface 'bold' is tied to the complete Court, not just the President, so it may well be some other member of the Court addressing you. So, no, we're still not out of it yet, but I expect a breakthrough soon. ;)

but before the case arose it was surely legal, Rosella not saying anything about SW until after Raf had said the word 'padawon'
IIRC (but my memory is really bad, and I'm not going to look it up either), the bright little genie had already expressed her aversion against anything SW-related. 8)
Title: Useless Conversation
Post by: copycat on September 26, 2005, 03:31:24 PM
Indeed.
/me asks the audience to please stay quiet, and to refrain from making comments on things that do not pertain to this case in the Courtroom (read: thread), and to do that outside (read: other thread). Thank you.
Title: Useless Conversation
Post by: racx_00 on September 27, 2005, 08:17:25 AM
We might as well just make this a Trial thread or something so we can continue to make court cases :D :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on October 02, 2005, 02:13:51 PM
what is going one here!!??  :o
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on October 02, 2005, 02:28:52 PM
YOU were trying to kill the last of Q's!  That's what's going on!  VILE, EVIL RAF!!

Wait, no, what is going on here?
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on October 02, 2005, 02:30:46 PM
(get on MSN Q XD)

i was? ??? O.o
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on October 02, 2005, 02:39:19 PM
YOU were trying to kill the last of Q's!  That's what's going on!  VILE, EVIL RAF!!
Not yet. Await your turn. 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on October 02, 2005, 02:41:01 PM
O_O;

HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE SUEING ME!!??
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on October 02, 2005, 11:06:17 PM
12.6

And I will not get on MSN because I have too much crap and have already have had too many problems with this laptop and thusly have refused to download MSN.  You get on Yahoo. Pffffft.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on October 02, 2005, 11:10:17 PM
12.6!!

is the 0.6 an midget? XD


--

ks
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on October 03, 2005, 10:03:06 AM
12.6!!

is the 0.6 an midget? XD
Yes they are a midget. They said that you hit them on the head with a sledge hammer and they are therefore suing you for the loss of height :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on October 03, 2005, 01:54:50 PM
Aw. Come on! No one should be suing Raf but me! :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: awesomeasapossum on October 03, 2005, 04:11:48 PM
I thought that this was Raf's thread.  :stars: :stars: :stars: :stars: :stars: :stars: :stars:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on October 03, 2005, 04:18:43 PM
Nuh-uh! This thread is about how Raf cruely caused me to have a seizure and then refused to admit to it. This thread's about ME! :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on October 03, 2005, 05:42:18 PM
I thought that this was Raf's thread.  :stars: :stars: :stars: :stars: :stars: :stars: :stars:

you just gave me a great idea XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on October 04, 2005, 03:12:03 PM
Nuh-uh! This thread is about how Raf cruely caused me to have a seizure and then refused to admit to it. This thread's about ME! :P
And soon (?) it will be about Raf endangering the existance of Q's so no, this thread is about the Court.  ;D :pleased:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on October 04, 2005, 11:53:47 PM
It's just always got to be about Rosella, huh?  She doesn't care if Q's go extinct! :( :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on October 05, 2005, 12:10:33 AM
I thought that the wonderful thing about Q's is that you're the only one. Or am I thinking of something else...? :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on October 05, 2005, 10:15:54 AM
If there is more than one Q, then Q's won't be unique anymore :P

Therefore no one will care about and look upto Q's anymore :P :suffer:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on October 05, 2005, 02:14:38 PM
I thought that the wonderful thing about Q's is that you're the only one.
That's the point isn't it? If Q's go extinct, there will be none! :o
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on October 08, 2005, 11:46:30 AM
So technically that means he is currently endangered, which means there is nothing to worry about :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on October 08, 2005, 11:52:29 AM
yeah... whatever Racx just said XD



(i cant change the name but i can....hehehehe)  :suffer:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on October 09, 2005, 02:29:25 PM
So technically that means he is currently endangered, which means there is nothing to worry about :P
Nothing to worry about? I don't think Q would agree to that and since he's most involved, it's his call. 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on October 10, 2005, 03:00:26 PM
There is everything to worry about! I need a client, if he were to be extinct I would have to join one of those Law firms that aren't respected and I don't want to do that. Besides he is my client and has even more right than yourself to be on this planet since he represents an entire specie and you only represent yourself!
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on October 11, 2005, 03:01:49 PM
I would have to join one of those Law firms that aren't respected and I don't want to do that.
No respectable law firms in your part of the world then? 8) Anyway, can't you go solo? ;)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on October 11, 2005, 05:16:53 PM
I couldn't start my own firm yet. There probably are some respected ones but I want to belong to one of those with a good reputation but is still cheap. I think it's awful if people can't get the right legal help they need, because they can't afford it.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on October 16, 2005, 03:16:22 PM
but I want to belong to one of those with a good reputation but is still cheap.
Can't blame them for wanting to make a living. :-\
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on October 16, 2005, 11:06:21 PM
For the record...I am very concerned about the extinction of Q's since we are endangered, and I am the only one which is a wonderful thing.  However, our bottoms are made out of sexiness, not springs...
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on October 17, 2005, 02:58:30 PM
However, our bottoms are made out of sexiness, not springs...
What prompted that reply?
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on October 21, 2005, 03:30:35 PM
There had been an earlier reference to the Tigger Song...I believe Jafar made it.  One of the lyrics to that song is "Our tops are made out of rubber, our bottoms are made out of springs" or something like that...
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Farquhar on October 21, 2005, 04:08:48 PM
There had been an earlier reference to the Tigger Song...I believe Jafar made it.  One of the lyrics to that song is "Our tops are made out of rubber, our bottoms are made out of springs" or something like that...
They're bouncy, trouncy, flouncy, pouncy,
Fun! Fun! Fun! Fun! Fun!
But the most wonderful thing about Tiggers is,
I'm the only one! ;D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on October 25, 2005, 04:37:33 AM
So, what's happening? We need to take action before Q becomes extinct :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on October 25, 2005, 02:32:29 PM
The President of the Jury leaves closed chambers, together with the Jury, everyone sits down where they're supposed to and the President proclaims Raf's sentence:

Raf's sentence is to become the First Servant, Supporter, and Janitor of the Supreme Queen of Posting, Cat.

Case CLOSED! The Jury is free to leave the Court room now. The Court would also like to thank the prosecuting and defending side for answering the Court's questions.

Now that that's out of the way, Q can choose his lawyer and charge who he wants to charge with whatever if wants to charge with. The defending side can then choose his/her lawyer and since I presume it's going to be Raf again, he may choose to stick with his current lawyer or choose another (I hear Rosella's a good one 8)). When this has been done, the Court can reconvene (?sp)?gr) to defend Justice in this case. :scholar:

For now though: The Court retires.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: koko_99_2001 on October 25, 2005, 03:06:19 PM
Whoo hoo! I have a servant! :D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on October 25, 2005, 03:12:28 PM
I had a seizure and did all that work of proving Raf guilty and Cat gets the servant... :'(
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on October 25, 2005, 03:19:09 PM
As the Princess, you can order him around too, and he has to listen to you. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on October 25, 2005, 03:20:34 PM
Oh, ok then. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: koko_99_2001 on October 25, 2005, 03:51:48 PM
But only if I give permission, right?
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on October 25, 2005, 04:01:55 PM
Yeah. After all, you ARE the Queen. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on October 25, 2005, 04:11:23 PM
:'(
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: koko_99_2001 on October 25, 2005, 04:21:34 PM
Fine, fine...

Raf is allowed to take orders from Rosella :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on October 25, 2005, 04:44:29 PM
W00T! :D *gives Cat a cookieh*

Now Raf, COME BACK TO THE FORUMS!! XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on October 26, 2005, 08:33:59 AM
Now Raf, COME BACK TO THE FORUMS!! XD
That's probably the toughest order he will receive :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on October 26, 2005, 04:42:34 PM
*A sign is erected outside the door of the Courtroom bearing the text: Cleaning in progress, please do not enter*
Everone gone? Good!
/me start cleaning.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on October 26, 2005, 06:22:36 PM
Hi ho! Hi ho! A-sarcasm cleaning we go! F...ffff.....FFFFF...Darn, I can't whistle.

Doot doot doot doot doot doot doot doot! Hi HO! Hi ho hi ho! A sarcasm cleaning we go!
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on October 28, 2005, 03:34:54 PM
For my lawyer, I choose...........

Hold on a sec....

>pulls out empty soda bottle and spins it<
>waits for it<
I CHOOSE YOU, LOLOTTE!!
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on October 28, 2005, 03:47:06 PM
Hi ho! Hi ho! A-sarcasm cleaning we go! F...ffff.....FFFFF...Darn, I can't whistle.

Doot doot doot doot doot doot doot doot! Hi HO! Hi ho hi ho! A sarcasm cleaning we go!
That's why nobody can go into the Courtroom 'unprepared'at this stage. The cleaning staff has to use highly toxic substances to remove all that sarcasm. :X  :scholar:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on October 28, 2005, 03:51:46 PM
I still had to pick a lawyer. >waits for trial to begin<
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: koko_99_2001 on October 28, 2005, 05:06:12 PM
Hi ho! Hi ho! A-sarcasm cleaning we go! F...ffff.....FFFFF...Darn, I can't whistle.

Doot doot doot doot doot doot doot doot! Hi HO! Hi ho hi ho! A sarcasm cleaning we go!
That's why nobody can go into the Courtroom 'unprepared'at this stage. The cleaning staff has to use highly toxic substances to remove all that sarcasm. :X  :scholar:

Good thing I'm letting Jafar take care of it :)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on October 29, 2005, 05:30:41 AM
erected
XD

 :P

/me helps Jafar clean up sarcasm :D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Lollotte on October 29, 2005, 12:48:36 PM
For my lawyer, I choose...........

Hold on a sec....

>pulls out empty soda bottle and spins it<
>waits for it<
I CHOOSE YOU, LOLOTTE!!

Me? Well, I'm flattered... ;D

We will begin when CC gets here. He will be pleased to see me back in court!  :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on October 30, 2005, 08:34:08 AM
Raf's sentence is to become the First Servant, Supporter, and Janitor of the Supreme Queen of Posting, Cat.

I DEMAND A RETRIAL!! :pokerface:


Whoo hoo! I have a servant! :D

This cant be happening!! XD


Now Raf, COME BACK TO THE FORUMS!! XD

your not the boss of me XD
(i'm back so cheer up :P)


That's probably the toughest order he will receive :P

:pokerface: hey!


erected
XD

 :P

keep quiet you :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on October 31, 2005, 04:57:22 AM
YAY! You're back!! ^^

This is just proof that everyone REALLY has a subconscious desire to obey my every command. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on November 01, 2005, 12:49:38 AM
Bah! Thats just an urban legend, and heres the mac and cheese you ordered. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on November 01, 2005, 04:52:06 AM
;D (You know you all love me. ;P)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Questing Character on November 01, 2005, 08:36:38 AM
No we don't.

>massages feet< :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on November 01, 2005, 09:09:59 AM
Maay I be a juror then? Just so I can have a part in court? (Good Luck Lolotte!)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on November 01, 2005, 10:03:08 AM
Even if I am not a part of this court, I will be here :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on November 01, 2005, 03:29:29 PM
We will begin when CC gets here. He will be pleased to see me back in court!  :P
As long as you're not in the Jury, I have no objections. ;D

I DEMAND A RETRIAL!! :pokerface:
On what grounds? :pokerface:

Maay I be a juror then? Just so I can have a part in court?
Yup. ;) At least as far as I'm concerned. You'll have to wait a bit though. 8)

Even if I am not a part of this court, I will be here :P
As audience? :P

*turns on ventilation system of Court Room to remove all the toxic substances, now saturated with sarcasm*
*cleaning staff leaves Court Room and remove sign at entrance*

Q has picked his lawyer, but I still have to hear from Raf if he will defend himself, or if he will pick a lawyer and if so, which one. Until that is done, the Court cannot start. :scholar:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on November 19, 2005, 01:25:23 AM
*WAITS for court to begin* (Patience has never been one of my virtues.)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on November 24, 2005, 02:57:49 PM
*WAITS for court to begin* (Patience has never been one of my virtues.)
The cogs of justice turn slowly, especially if you've got a defendant who tends to disappear quite regularly. 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on November 24, 2005, 05:59:44 PM
He must be out commiting more crimes. :P
Er, I mean, great, heroic acts of...something. Never mind.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on November 25, 2005, 09:00:33 AM
acts of ebilness?  ;D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on November 30, 2005, 02:54:51 PM
Must be. Lately the Court itself has also been unreachable during week-ends, so if the defendant turns up at that time, don't expect the Court to notice it until after that period. 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 12, 2006, 10:18:44 AM
*revives* I want a case! :P ::)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on April 12, 2006, 10:22:27 AM
How about the case of you vs. 5-month thread revivals? ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on April 12, 2006, 10:25:43 AM
Well, Judge CC is semi-absent. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 12, 2006, 10:27:58 AM
How about the case of you vs. 5-month thread revivals? ;P
Okay! :P But then I can't be a juror :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on April 23, 2006, 04:24:21 PM
But i can XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on April 24, 2006, 03:00:20 PM
Well, Judge CC is semi-absent. :P
Semi<>completely. And the only reason I have been very absent from this thread is because I was under the impression this thread had served its purpose and the new messages was just caused by some passers-by. If/when there's a case, just drop me an IM and the Court will be formed asap. 8)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on April 24, 2006, 03:10:29 PM
I think it makes more sense to have a new case in a new thread, unless Rosella feels like suing Raf again. XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on April 24, 2006, 03:14:23 PM
Well, he's my boss, so I'm sure I'll find something to sue him for soon enough. :P

Er, I mean, I would NEVER sue Raf again!
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on April 25, 2006, 11:21:45 AM
That would be more of a Jarada's vs. Rosella though. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: awesomeasapossum on April 25, 2006, 05:15:00 PM
Or would it?????



WHERE WERE YOU ON THE NIGHT OF TOMMOROW?!
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 26, 2006, 05:04:38 AM
Or would it?????



WHERE WERE YOU ON THE NIGHT OF TOMMOROW?!

XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on April 26, 2006, 12:25:27 PM
Well, he's my boss, so I'm sure I'll find something to sue him for soon enough. :P

Er, I mean, I would NEVER sue Raf again!

OMGLOL XD

Great to hear that  ::)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 26, 2006, 01:15:17 PM
*sues Raf for lack of spoilers* :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on April 26, 2006, 03:16:56 PM
Hey, we gave out PLENTY of spoilers! We're VERY generous compared to the Yonkster. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on April 26, 2006, 04:02:49 PM
 :suffer:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 27, 2006, 10:17:27 AM
Hey, we gave out PLENTY of spoilers! We're VERY generous compared to the Yonkster. :P
One more:
I'm not really the main boss am I? :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on April 27, 2006, 11:59:09 AM
Hey, we gave out PLENTY of spoilers! We're VERY generous compared to the Yonkster. :P
One more:
I'm not really the main boss am I? :P
:suffer:
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 27, 2006, 12:00:59 PM
*sues* I confiscated that smiley and now it's back?! :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on April 27, 2006, 02:00:28 PM
Hey, we gave out PLENTY of spoilers! We're VERY generous compared to the Yonkster. :P
One more:
I'm not really the main boss am I? :P
You'll have to find THAT out yourself... ;D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 27, 2006, 02:01:01 PM
When's the game going to be done so I can find out?! :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on April 27, 2006, 02:02:16 PM
Um....*mutters something unintelligible and runs away* XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 27, 2006, 02:03:06 PM
Um....*mutters something unintelligible and runs away* XD
XD

*follows :P*
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on April 27, 2006, 02:05:03 PM
You can't come any closer! I have my attack dog, with a built in Force Field! :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on April 27, 2006, 02:09:24 PM
Aww poor thing. :'( How do you feed it with that annoying Force Field always getting in the way? ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on April 27, 2006, 04:21:11 PM
You use proton torpedoes. Can bring down almost any shield ;P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on April 27, 2006, 04:23:16 PM
Red 5 standing by! Lock S-foils in attack position. *ching*
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on April 27, 2006, 04:45:42 PM
Sends a wing of Tie-Defenders :suffer:

you DO know what they are, right? ;)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on April 27, 2006, 04:46:29 PM
Um...they defend ties? :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on April 27, 2006, 05:08:40 PM
Basically, they're TIE Advances on crugs. :P
*zaps them* XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on April 27, 2006, 05:13:07 PM
Its an advanced tie fighter with shields and hyper-space ;P

*throws star cruisers against jafar's x-wings* XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Rosella on April 27, 2006, 05:17:33 PM
*throws shoes at the tie-fighter*

This should defeat it, right? :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on April 27, 2006, 05:20:01 PM
What does a Star Destroyer wear to a formal party?


A Bow Tie! XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on April 27, 2006, 05:29:20 PM
*throws shoes at the tie-fighter*

This should defeat it, right? :P

BOOOM!!
*Alpha wing has been destroyed*

- "But... but thats impossible"  :o

XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Oldbushie on April 27, 2006, 08:44:58 PM
Wookie: "Graaaaaaaaaggh!"*

*I'm hungry. Let's go get burgers!
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on April 27, 2006, 10:03:40 PM
You said it, Chewie. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Raforever on April 29, 2006, 11:49:22 AM
YAY! Food at last XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Oldbushie on April 29, 2006, 12:15:12 PM
Mmmm, triple burger with cheeeeese...  :D
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 29, 2006, 12:32:01 PM
I hereby sue you all *points at Jafar, Oldbsuhie, Raforever, Rosella and Yonkey* for a) bringing this thread off-topic, and b) for submitting to the off-topic-ness by continuing the conversation even if you didn't bring it off.topic to begin with! :P   
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Oldbushie on April 29, 2006, 01:12:13 PM
Does that mean the burger has to be held as evidence? XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 29, 2006, 01:16:46 PM
Does that mean the burger has to be held as evidence? XD
Yes! :P
As do these posts, in case anyone deletes them:
Mmmm, triple burger with cheeeeese...  :D
YAY! Food at last XD
You said it, Chewie. :P
You said it, Chewie. :P
Wookie: "Graaaaaaaaaggh!"*

*I'm hungry. Let's go get burgers!
Wookie: "Graaaaaaaaaggh!"*

*I'm hungry. Let's go get burgers!
*throws shoes at the tie-fighter*

This should defeat it, right? :P

BOOOM!!
*Alpha wing has been destroyed*

- "But... but thats impossible"  :o

XD
*throws shoes at the tie-fighter*

This should defeat it, right? :P

BOOOM!!
*Alpha wing has been destroyed*

- "But... but thats impossible"  :o

XD
What does a Star Destroyer wear to a formal party?


A Bow Tie! XD
*throws shoes at the tie-fighter*

This should defeat it, right? :P
Its an advanced tie fighter with shields and hyper-space ;P

*throws star cruisers against jafar's x-wings* XD
Basically, they're TIE Advances on crugs. :P
*zaps them* XD
Um...they defend ties? :P
Um...they defend ties? :P
Sends a wing of Tie-Defenders :suffer:

you DO know what they are, right? ;)
Red 5 standing by! Lock S-foils in attack position. *ching*
You use proton torpedoes. Can bring down almost any shield ;P
Aww poor thing. :'( How do you feed it with that annoying Force Field always getting in the way? ;P
You can't come any closer! I have my attack dog, with a built in Force Field! :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Oldbushie on April 29, 2006, 01:28:57 PM
Lots of repeat posts in there. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 29, 2006, 01:32:49 PM
Indeed :P
As I've just named two members that could easily modify my post :P, I figured one can never be too careful :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on April 29, 2006, 01:59:19 PM
My post was after Jafar's, not before it. :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on April 29, 2006, 11:59:46 PM
uh...That's irrelevant! :P
You're still both sued! :P
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: racx_00 on May 01, 2006, 07:43:55 AM
Well atleast I'm not getting sued. XD
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: copycat on May 01, 2006, 02:30:29 PM
I think it makes more sense to have a new case in a new thread, unless Rosella feels like suing Raf again. XD
In the past, when there was talk of another case, I already pondered if it would not be better to change the title of this thread to something more general. After all, Court proceedings shouldn't take more than 20 pages each. 8)

Well, he's my boss, so I'm sure I'll find something to sue him for soon enough. :P
Huh? Raf's the bright little genie's boss ???

I hereby sue you all *points at Jafar, Oldbsuhie, Raforever, Rosella and Yonkey* for a) bringing this thread off-topic, and b) for submitting to the off-topic-ness by continuing the conversation even if you didn't bring it off.topic to begin with! :P
Wow! A mass-sue :o
*redocarates the Court Room to make it possible to hold that much people being sued*
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Oldbushie on May 01, 2006, 06:40:01 PM
We'll have to call an interior decorator. ;)
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Jafar on May 01, 2006, 06:42:20 PM
I object! Off-topicness isn't a crime! It's a state of mind! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 02, 2006, 09:49:17 AM
I think it makes more sense to have a new case in a new thread, unless Rosella feels like suing Raf again. XD
In the past, when there was talk of another case, I already pondered if it would not be better to change the title of this thread to something more general. After all, Court proceedings shouldn't take more than 20 pages each. 8)

Well, he's my boss, so I'm sure I'll find something to sue him for soon enough. :P
Huh? Raf's the bright little genie's boss ???


Yes :P

I object! Off-topicness isn't a crime! It's a state of mind! :P
It is, but only after being as crime. It's a crime first, then a state of mind : :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on May 02, 2006, 11:45:21 PM
Besides, the original topic involved Star Wars, so mentioning it is HARDLY off-topic. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 03, 2006, 10:38:29 AM
The original case has been closed :P
But you knew I wanted a case and was determind to get one, it's your own fault :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Raforever on May 03, 2006, 03:55:45 PM
I call mental insantity ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on May 04, 2006, 03:49:38 AM
I call mental insantity ;P
I'll be your lawyer again! :D :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Lollotte on May 04, 2006, 10:12:21 AM
I will be the court stenographer! That's easy.  :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 05, 2006, 09:27:55 PM
I'll heckle the jury. :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 06, 2006, 02:39:33 AM
I'll heckle the jury. :D
But I'm suing you as well :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 06, 2006, 02:52:05 AM
That doesn't keep me from heckling them. :P

*heckles em while making his statement* XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 06, 2006, 11:27:59 AM
Warlock's going to help me prove your guilt! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 06, 2006, 02:16:40 PM
But, I thought he was on my side... :'(
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 06, 2006, 03:45:34 PM
Sorry, he's representing me. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 06, 2006, 09:20:57 PM
*pouts* :'(
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 07, 2006, 01:20:15 AM
And I'm taking Raf out of it. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 07, 2006, 02:22:15 AM
No fair. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 07, 2006, 02:26:16 AM
Well, since YOU don't have any spoilers to share :P...
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 07, 2006, 02:30:52 AM
If I spoiled anything, Cesar would have me mysteriously disappear.  ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 07, 2006, 02:32:46 AM
If I spoiled anything, Cesar would have me mysteriously disappear.  ::)
XD

Mabye...But if Cesar didn't know about it...(besides, I'm sure you didn't have a license agreement back then, did you? :P)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on May 07, 2006, 05:57:47 AM
Bribe them all then!!  :P
That wouldn't hurt anyone ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 07, 2006, 06:01:16 AM
It would. I can't bribe Rosella. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on May 07, 2006, 11:15:15 AM
Why can't you bribe me? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Questing Character on May 07, 2006, 12:06:43 PM
Just curious...has anyone noticed that I'm still taped to the evidence table?  I kinda need to go to the bathroom so if someone could help me out here...:P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on May 07, 2006, 12:15:05 PM
That's not duct tape, that's scotch tape! Just stand up, it'll snap right off. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Questing Character on May 07, 2006, 12:16:26 PM
Jafar, it's silver.  It's not scotch tape. :P

(I wonder is this sort of like Every Tape Has a Silver Lining?)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on May 07, 2006, 12:18:18 PM
Oh, fine. *melts tape with PLASMA POWER!* XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Questing Character on May 07, 2006, 12:34:34 PM
Oh, thanks! >gets up to go to the bathroom<

JAFAR!!  YOU MELTED MY CLOTHES TOO!!
>strategically places hands and runs to bathroom<
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on May 07, 2006, 12:36:39 PM
Did not! You're just delusional. Plasma Power NEVER fails! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 07, 2006, 06:00:41 PM
I guess Questie is now one of the defendants? ::)

*shakes finger at offtopicness*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Questing Character on May 07, 2006, 06:31:08 PM
All I know is somebody better buy me some clothes.  Versaci please. :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 07, 2006, 06:49:39 PM
*buys you a Prada manpurse* :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Questing Character on May 07, 2006, 06:58:59 PM
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!


GET IT AWAY!  GET IT AWAY!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 07, 2006, 07:09:16 PM
But it matches perfectly with your brand new Gucci suit. ;)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Questing Character on May 07, 2006, 08:01:48 PM
But its a MANPURSE!  DISGUSTING!

I'll take the Gucci though. >grabs the Gucci suit and runs<
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 07, 2006, 08:13:20 PM
*wonders if he should mention that the Gucci suit is perfumed....*  ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on May 07, 2006, 08:15:15 PM
With Gucci cologne? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on May 07, 2006, 08:21:12 PM
No... baby powder. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Questing Character on May 07, 2006, 08:52:59 PM
That's what washing machines are for.  And other colognes.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 08, 2006, 10:01:35 AM
Why can't you bribe me? :P
Which game are you working on (besides the Jarada's), that you have spoilers from :P?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on May 08, 2006, 01:45:01 PM
I don't have spoilers from the Jarada game. XD

I have no spoilers! :P

Well, actually, I could spoil the plot of KH1 and 2! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 17, 2006, 12:54:53 PM
Sorry. :P I've never played nor own either of those, and I hardly know anything about it, os spoilers from those wouldn't do me much good. :P
Anything on Dirk Delshire's project? :P You said something about being a team member on that..:P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on May 17, 2006, 01:33:29 PM
I am, but I have no spoilers on that either. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 17, 2006, 03:07:53 PM
Besides, the original topic involved Star Wars, so mentioning it is HARDLY off-topic. :P
Ah, but those Court proceedings have long been concluded, so mentioning it again is a new fact and can be sued again too. :scholar:

And I'm taking Raf out of it. :P
Taking Raf out of what?

Just curious...has anyone noticed that I'm still taped to the evidence table?  I kinda need to go to the bathroom so if someone could help me out here...:P
Yes, but that evidence table has been moved into the storage room and we ordered another one. :pokerface:

Oh, thanks! >gets up to go to the bathroom<
Good, now I have two evidence tables. :pleased:

Well, actually, I could spoil the plot of KH1 and 2! :P
What's KH1 and 2?

PS: Yes, finally the Court has its own threade (That's a deliberate typo)! ;D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on May 17, 2006, 03:09:34 PM
"Deliberate typo." XD I find that entertaining somehow. :P

KH=Kingdom Hearts.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 18, 2006, 11:19:16 AM
I meant I'm not suing Raf. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 21, 2006, 04:12:58 PM
I meant I'm not suing Raf. :P
Okay, no problem. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 22, 2006, 10:02:58 AM
But if I didn't sue everyone that could give me a spoiler, then I'd just have t to sue Rosella and I wanted a mass sue... :P So I'd have to say, I'm suing Raf again :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on May 22, 2006, 01:51:33 PM
Don't sue me, or I'll cry. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 22, 2006, 02:37:38 PM
But if there's no one to sue, this thread will die...:P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on May 22, 2006, 02:52:28 PM
What was wrong with suing Raf? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 22, 2006, 02:53:26 PM
He can give me spoilers. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on May 22, 2006, 04:15:44 PM
Can't you sue him and demand spoilers instead of money? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on May 23, 2006, 04:35:01 AM
But if there's no one to sue, this thread will die...:P
You can always sue anyone because of any part of KQ9 that you can't play yet. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 23, 2006, 12:13:48 PM
Can't you sue him and demand spoilers instead of money? :P
Okay :D

I sue all the aforementioned, and bail is two spoilers in damage from each of you and by that I mean REAL, spoilers. Or I'll sue you again. :P And yes, Rosella can spoil KH2 if she wants :P, or she could just tell me what she does in Dirk Delshire's project...:P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on May 23, 2006, 04:32:06 PM
I don't do anything! XD I'm on the team, but I've never actually been contacted about working on anything, and I have no clue of what anything's about. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 23, 2006, 11:16:41 PM
I don't do anything! XD I'm on the team, but I've never actually been contacted about working on anything, and I have no clue of what anything's about. :P
You must have some position :P

Also, you HAVE to answer! No one can hide behind the fifth amendment or anything like that. Spoilers can be given via PM's.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on May 24, 2006, 12:26:06 AM
Bah! I'm not talking! Imprison me, execute me, wabbaever. You won't get any spoilers out of me!



No, not even hidden with tiny text.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 24, 2006, 04:32:51 AM
Bah! I'm not talking! Imprison me, execute me, wabbaever. You won't get any spoilers out of me!



No, not even hidden with tiny text.

What about normal sized text? *imprisons Jafar until the trial*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on May 24, 2006, 05:09:35 AM
I have a spoiler! Flying, silver trees are VERY important. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on May 24, 2006, 05:11:58 AM
Bah! I'm not talking! Imprison me, execute me, wabbaever. You won't get any spoilers out of me!



No, not even hidden with tiny text.

What about normal sized text? *imprisons Jafar until the trial*
Nope. Sorry. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 24, 2006, 05:13:16 AM
Meanieh.

And Rosella, PM me the spoilers, they're not real spoilers if everyone knows them ;P at least to me they aren't. Besides for which game is this? :P

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on May 24, 2006, 05:22:40 AM
Meanieh.
Pirate. ;D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 24, 2006, 07:23:03 PM
*imprisons Jafar until the trial*
On whose authority are you trying to imprison Jafar? :pokerface:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 25, 2006, 05:08:03 AM
He told me to :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on May 25, 2006, 05:08:41 AM
Did not. I was saying that nothing you could do could convince me to give up a spoiler.  ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 27, 2006, 12:50:05 PM
Jafar has given me his spoilers. Neil still owes me one. All the others are still sued with the original charges :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on May 27, 2006, 12:50:49 PM
I told you about flying silver trees! That's a spoiler! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 27, 2006, 12:52:28 PM
You didn't tell me to what it went or what it was, so technically, that's only half of a spoiler :P And you have to submit all spoilers by way of PM or MSN, so they belong exclusively to me :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 02, 2006, 03:45:16 PM
Jafar has given me his spoilers. Neil still owes me one. All the others are still sued with the original charges :P
But the investigation has not yet finished its course, so the Court can't convene. :scholar:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 02, 2006, 04:18:21 PM
Well, can the investigation please finish it's course? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 14, 2006, 03:59:02 PM
Well, can the investigation please finish it's course? :P
That all depends on you, my dear. If all the other options at your disposal have not brought any result, this is the final stop. 8)
Do you want a lawyer representing you, or are you charging the defendants yourself? In any case, if you decide to go to court, please give the names of the accused asap. ;)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 14, 2006, 11:32:46 PM
*gets a swiss cheese lawyer*
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Deloria on June 15, 2006, 04:44:51 AM
I hereby sue you all *points at Jafar, Oldbushie, Raforever, Rosella and Yonkey* for a) bringing this thread off-topic, and b) for submitting to the off-topic-ness by continuing the conversation even if you didn't bring it off.topic to begin with! :P   
I'm going to court :P. As my lawyer no longer frequents this forum, I'm going to represent myself, however, if someone should want this case, please PM me. The accused are: Oldbushie and Yonkey. :P The others have managed to settle with me outside of court.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 15, 2006, 06:01:04 AM
Why am I the accused again? XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 15, 2006, 10:03:09 AM
You went off topic/partook in the off-topicness, and you still owe me a spoiler if you want to settle outside of court. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 15, 2006, 10:04:59 AM
and you still owe me a spoiler if you want to settle outside of court. :P
I guess we'll be going to trial then! :suffer:

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 15, 2006, 10:05:53 AM
I'll be someone's lawyer!! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 15, 2006, 10:06:34 AM
I guess so. :P I would like a few days before we commence, though, if that's alright CC.
Okay, Rosella. :P You're hired
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 15, 2006, 10:07:52 AM
Ok, awesome. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 15, 2006, 10:10:06 AM
I'd like to represent myself. 8)  But since Bushie's presence is kinda sporadic maybe you can represent him? XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 15, 2006, 11:16:59 AM
I want Mote to be my lawyer! :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 15, 2006, 11:18:23 AM
I want Mote to be my lawyer! :D
XD

Actually, I've decided to go through most of the proceedings myself, but would it be possible for me to consult Rosella and for her to aid me?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 15, 2006, 11:27:30 AM
Of course! ;D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 15, 2006, 01:08:48 PM
Neil, you do realize you still have a chance to settle with me outside of court...:P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 15, 2006, 01:39:35 PM
Hmmm.... :suffer:

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 15, 2006, 01:42:26 PM
I mean, it's a tempting offer, right? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 15, 2006, 03:09:27 PM
I would like a few days before we commence, though, if that's alright CC.
No problem. 8)

Actually, I've decided to go through most of the proceedings myself, but would it be possible for me to consult Rosella and for her to aid me?
I'm not sure about that. This might bring us on the limb of legality. :-\

Of course! ;D
The accused is not at liberty to answer to questions asked to the Court.

Neil, you do realize you still have a chance to settle with me outside of court...:P

Hmmm.... :suffer:

XD
You're lucky the Court is not officially in session yet, or I would have sued you with contempt of Court by using that particular smiley. :o
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 15, 2006, 05:15:34 PM
Your Honour, the Plaintiff was attempting to bribe me. ;P 

Exhibit A:
I mean, it's a tempting offer, right? :P

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 04:28:18 AM
Actually, I was merely attempting to settle outside of court, which is allowed. :P

Okay, in that case, Rosella can and will represent me if she wants to :P

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 16, 2006, 07:29:52 AM
Actually, I was merely attempting to settle outside of court, which is allowed. :P
I already declined your offer twice. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 16, 2006, 10:06:28 AM
Can someone refresh what the actual case was about before I'm hired? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 10:08:12 AM
Going off topic on the page four pages ago :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 16, 2006, 10:09:15 AM
...

Ok, Deloria has no room to accuse people of being off topic. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 10:10:32 AM
XD But I did back then :P Besides, OB put me up to it . :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 16, 2006, 10:11:34 AM
Deloria, it was still your idea and you know it. ;P

I vote we drop the case. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 10:12:57 AM
*fires Rosella* I'm representing myself :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 16, 2006, 10:59:15 AM
XD But I did back then :P Besides, OB put me up to it . :P
:o  Your Honour, this is clearly grounds for declaring a mistrail!

;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 11:05:14 AM
You're just trying to get out of getting sued. :P Besides, that was a whole posting spree without me :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 16, 2006, 11:14:09 AM
You have no proof of that! XD

Psst when's the trial gonna start? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 11:16:10 AM
Did I post in it other than to point out you were all being sued? :P
As soon as CC gets here :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 12:02:53 PM
XD But I did back then :P Besides, OB put me up to it . :P
Why would I if you're suing me? XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 12:11:36 PM
You put me up to a posting spree when you started :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 12:25:54 PM
Riiiiiiiiight. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 12:32:52 PM
You didn't have to post! You're just a bad influence on me :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 16, 2006, 12:43:48 PM
*puts on a CC mask and sneaks up to the Judge's Official Throne*
*BANG* Not guilty. *runs*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 12:44:21 PM
XD
 
But you're no longer being charged! Why do you care? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 16, 2006, 12:49:42 PM
I'm just a simple guy who wants true justice to win this one. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 12:49:48 PM
Maybe he was acting on my behalf. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 12:50:28 PM
But they went off-topic first! I'm not saying they can't sue me for excessive posting, I'm just saying I did it first! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 16, 2006, 12:53:09 PM
*countersues* XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 12:53:49 PM
Okay, but can we wait until the proceedings for this case are over? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 16, 2006, 12:54:18 PM
*starts pacing XD* Simply going slightly off-topic isn't a crime. It happens all the time, and the mods simply clean up the mess and go about their business. As it is not a crime, it should not be treated as such, nor should the perpretrators be treated as criminals. If you truly want justice to win, you'll forgive them and drop the case.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 12:55:13 PM
But I WANT A CASE!! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 16, 2006, 12:55:51 PM
Then wait for them to do something BAD. :P Honestly... ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 16, 2006, 01:00:35 PM
Then wait for them to do something BAD. :P Honestly... ::)
Correct. That shouldn't be too difficult... :sneaky:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 01:01:18 PM
But it is!!:P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 01:07:43 PM
But I WANT A CASE!! :P

*gives you a suitcase* ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 01:08:53 PM
XD

*bangs gaval* Is there anyone present who wishes to be sued? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 01:14:46 PM
*hides in the bushes and tosses out a Furby with a sign that says "Sue me!"*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 16, 2006, 01:17:40 PM
Wait, sue OB for bringing that....that THING here! :o
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 16, 2006, 01:22:03 PM
Are you saying you'd like to sue Bushie & Bushes for Indecent Furby Exposure? XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 01:22:37 PM
The Furby's not mine, honest! XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 01:23:05 PM
Are you saying you'd like to sue Bushie & Bushes for Indecent Furby Exposure? XD
XD

*sues Bushie for being a perv*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 16, 2006, 01:23:16 PM
Furbies are pure evil masquerading as innocent toys!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 16, 2006, 01:25:02 PM
The Furby's not mine, honest! XD
Don't worry, he's suing the bushes you were hiding in as well. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 01:27:22 PM
The Furby's not mine, honest! XD
Don't worry, he's suing the bushes you were hiding in as well. ;P
XD

I'm suing Bushie! That's right, Bushie! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 16, 2006, 01:28:18 PM
Oh, both you and Jafar are suing Bushie now? XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 01:28:27 PM
*steps out from a limo* What's my evil twin doing in the bushes? o_O
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 01:28:59 PM
XD

Yup, we're both suing both Bushies! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 16, 2006, 01:29:30 PM
I'm too lazy to actually sue. I'm just trying to get her to sue for a noble cause. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 16, 2006, 01:29:53 PM
*gasps* :o  It's Oldbushie's evil twin: Oldshrubie! :o

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 01:31:53 PM
*aims his laser gun at Oldshrubie*

But... I just can't kill him... he's too handsome! XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 01:32:57 PM
*aims his laser gun at Oldshrubie*

But... I just can't kill him... he's too handsome! XD
XD

I guess that means you're fraternal twins? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 16, 2006, 01:33:42 PM
Whoa...major burn there. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 01:35:37 PM
*accidentally fires, giving Oldshrubie a haircut*

Well, at least you can tell which one is evil now. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 01:36:41 PM
Aw.. I'm sorry *feels badly* :'(
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 01:38:06 PM
It's ok, I'm the better looking one anyway. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 16, 2006, 01:57:05 PM
It's ok, I'm the better looking one anyway. XD
XD
 okay.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 16, 2006, 05:55:52 PM
*tosses the Furby into a nearby lake and it explodes into a tsunami blast*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 17, 2006, 06:12:45 AM
*ducks and retrieves Furby* :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 17, 2006, 06:26:35 AM
*sues Jafar for spreading lies about a noblewoman*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 17, 2006, 06:42:41 AM
I plead temporary insanity. After all, that post WAS in the Asylum. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 17, 2006, 07:13:00 AM
I ask his honor humbly, to drop all other cases until this has finished.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Vildern on June 17, 2006, 07:23:13 AM
I'll be exhibit A, the air Jafar was breathing at the time crime  :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 17, 2006, 07:28:26 AM
I accuse Jafar of faking insanity! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 17, 2006, 03:57:52 PM
*ducks and retrieves Furby* :P

How can you retireve it? It exploded. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 17, 2006, 04:00:04 PM
Faking? You think I'm FAKING!? Why don't you tell Bob that I'm FAKING? I'm never been more insulted in half my life! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 18, 2006, 03:01:35 AM
XD Sure you haven't.

*ducks and retrieves Furby* :P

How can you retireve it? It exploded. ;P
It didn't! Jafar was just pretending to be insane and he pretended he was hallucinating that  :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 18, 2006, 09:59:33 AM
As the almost asylum counselor, I have to get to know the patients. I know for a fact that Jafar has mental problems. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 18, 2006, 01:24:41 PM
When you put it that way, it sounds...mean. :(
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 18, 2006, 01:40:16 PM
But he was faking then!! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 18, 2006, 01:41:43 PM
When you put it that way, it sounds...mean. :(

Aww, I'm sorry. You have very good mental problems! They don't cause pain to anyone, and they make you fun to be around! Be happy! *hugs* XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 18, 2006, 01:44:46 PM
Thanks, Kelsey. ;D

*sticks tounge out at Deloria* :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 18, 2006, 01:50:13 PM
Thanks, Kelsey. ;D

*sticks tounge out at Deloria* :P
*sues Jafar for insulting a person of royal bood* :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 18, 2006, 01:51:47 PM
That's not a sue-worthy offense. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 18, 2006, 01:52:26 PM
I call it treason :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 18, 2006, 01:53:40 PM
That was hardly treasonous. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 18, 2006, 01:55:29 PM
Definition of treason: 
disloyalty by virtue of subversive behavior
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 18, 2006, 02:17:01 PM
He was in no way disloyal. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 18, 2006, 02:52:45 PM
People who post in my threade automatically swear fealty to me, there are exceptions but he's not one of them. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 19, 2006, 02:17:40 PM
:o  Your Honour, this is clearly grounds for declaring a mistrail!
These are preliminary hearings, so there's no actual trial yet.

Psst when's the trial gonna start? :P

As soon as CC gets here :P
...and declares this trial as open.

*puts on a CC mask and sneaks up to the Judge's Official Throne*
*BANG* Not guilty. *runs*
Hey! :evil:
*sues Jafar for contempt of Court*

*countersues* XD
The defendant can not countersue while he is being a defendant in this case. 8)

*bangs gaval* Is there anyone present who wishes to be sued? :P
First Jafar, now you, what is it with these gavel-bangings?  :o ::)

I ask his honor humbly, to drop all other cases until this has finished.
The Court would like to know which case it is to consider 'this' one, as it has lost track :-\

I accuse Jafar of faking insanity! :P
The Manager of the Official TSL Asylum has attested to the fact Jafar is REALLY insane.

As the almost asylum counselor, I have to get to know the patients. I know for a fact that Jafar has mental problems. :P
As the Court stated in the previous reply :pokerface:

Now, you'll notice I have still not declared Court proceedings open and these are still preliminary hearings. As soon as the Court has been informed of which case it actually is Deloria would like to sue who for, we can begin 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 20, 2006, 06:04:34 AM
Um...Genie, Meanie, Miney, Moe....Okay fine. :P I'm suing Yonkey and OB for going off-topic in this wonderful threade. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on June 20, 2006, 09:25:32 AM
People who post in my threade automatically swear fealty to me, there are exceptions but he's not one of them. :P
I'm one of the exceptions! Hip-hip hooray! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 20, 2006, 01:57:03 PM
I'm suing Yonkey and OB for going off-topic in this wonderful threade. :P
[size=0]I have a hunch this trial won't last long[/size]
All rise, as The Court is now entering the room.
The Court would like to know if the Accusing party or the Defending parties require a jury to be present on this case, seeing as how it thinks it will be difficult to find impartial members.
Court proceedings have now officially STARTED.
8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 20, 2006, 01:59:53 PM
Defense does not require the presence of a jury, Your Honour. 8)

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 20, 2006, 07:45:45 PM
*enters the room in shackles*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 22, 2006, 09:00:43 AM
XD

Your Honor, I believe that was a plea for sympathy. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on June 22, 2006, 10:07:06 AM
...but the guards put me in them! ;P Something about me trying to run away.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 22, 2006, 11:06:27 AM
...but the guards put me in them! ;P Something about me trying to run away.
XD

Sure. Your Honor, is it allowed, pleading for sympathy among the jury (assuming OB wants one)?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 23, 2006, 05:16:29 PM
...but the guards put me in them! ;P Something about me trying to run away.
The Court thinks it is obvious defense is not allowed to run away.

Your Honor, is it allowed, pleading for sympathy among the jury (assuming OB wants one)?
Ofcourse, pleading for sympathy is allowed, even if there's no jury. Whether that will work is another matter though. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 24, 2006, 04:30:30 AM
Very well. May I begin?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 24, 2006, 04:48:00 AM
Sure. XD

If you wait for CC to answer that, we may be waiting a while, so just go ahead and start. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 24, 2006, 06:56:46 AM
XD
Okay:

I put it to you, Yonkey, that you went off-topic on 27 of April 2006, 22:09:24. Your Honor, I have proof of this claim:
Aww poor thing. :'( How do you feed it with that annoying Force Field always getting in the way? ;P

I would also like to point out, that, at the time, I had not yet started posting on a ferrocious rate, so technically, I have every right to present this as evidence and sue Yonkey for going off-topic. :P

I put it to you Oldbushie, that you also went off-topic twice, in this thread on the 28 and 29 of April.

Wookie: "Graaaaaaaaaggh!"*
*I'm hungry. Let's go get burgers!

Mmmm, triple burger with cheeeeese...  :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 24, 2006, 08:12:32 AM
Objection! XD

My post was in direct reply to Jafar's (who was referring to you):
You can't come any closer! I have my attack dog, with a built in Force Field! :P

So, if you want to prosecute any further, you'll need to call Jafar to the stand. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 24, 2006, 08:18:24 AM
Re: The Court Thread
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 24, 2006, 09:13:25 AM
You rang? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 24, 2006, 09:18:25 AM
I did. Please enter the stand and raise your right hand. :P Now, do you solemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? If so, please be seated.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 24, 2006, 09:53:34 AM
Hey, you can trust me. I'm ME. :D But yeah, I'll be truthful. :P *sits down*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 25, 2006, 03:39:10 AM
If this case is prosecuted fully, I'm going to have to sue Deloria for at least 5 times whatever she's sueing for. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 25, 2006, 04:26:01 PM
Objection! XD

My post was in direct reply to Jafar's (who was referring to you):
You can't come any closer! I have my attack dog, with a built in Force Field! :P

So, if you want to prosecute any further, you'll need to call Jafar to the stand. :P
Just to make this official:
OBJECTION SUSTAINED


If this case is prosecuted fully, I'm going to have to sue Deloria for at least 5 times whatever she's sueing for. :P
While that may well be, let's concentrate on the current case of Deloria vs Yonkey and OB please. This court can't take on two cases at the same time. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: telepathic_cat on June 27, 2006, 02:04:20 PM
*kicks down the court room door*  HOLD IT!!  I have new evidence relatin to this case!!!  *places a needle marked "INSULIN" on the evidence table*  No one in this room commited the crime!  It was that crazy guys from the Diabetes commercials!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 27, 2006, 02:33:05 PM
*fails to see what that has to do with going off-topic in this thread ::) :P*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 27, 2006, 02:39:19 PM
Well, I'm at the stand, so...now what? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: telepathic_cat on June 27, 2006, 02:45:52 PM
*Takes out a pouch and throws it at Jafar*  It's full of buttered communism, only the best, of course.  You've been there for a while, thought you might be hungry.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 27, 2006, 03:47:36 PM
*kicks down the court room door*  HOLD IT!!  I have new evidence relatin to this case!!!  *places a needle marked "INSULIN" on the evidence table*  No one in this room commited the crime!  It was that crazy guys from the Diabetes commercials!!
The Court asks the attending police officer(s) to remove this lunatic from the Court room 8)

Well, I'm at the stand, so...now what? :P
Since the prosecutor called you to the stand, she may now ask you to supply this Court with some information of her choice, after which the defendant(s) can cross-examine you. 8)

*Takes out a pouch and throws it at Jafar*  It's full of buttered communism, only the best, of course.  You've been there for a while, thought you might be hungry.
The Court has its own caterer to attend to those things, thank you very much. And are you still/back in here?
/me informs the guards outside the courtoom to make sure this idiot doesn't enter again
 :pokerface:

PS: please take no personal offense at the 'lunatic' and 'idiot', it has nothing do with you as a person, but with your actions in this court. Just to make sure...
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 28, 2006, 08:18:48 AM
Jafar, do you admit you went off-topic and thus encouraged others to do so in this thread?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 28, 2006, 08:21:04 AM
I admit to going off-topic, but not to encouraging the others to do so. I can't be held responsible for them continuing the off-topic-ness. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 28, 2006, 08:27:29 AM
Yet you continued the off-topicness because you didn't want people to go off-topic? ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 28, 2006, 08:34:59 AM
I chose to go off-topic of my own accord, as did the others who posted after me. I only continued because they did.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 28, 2006, 08:53:09 AM
So, had I not intervened this would have gone on for a lot longer? :P It would have been possible to cease, yet you chose not to, why?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 28, 2006, 02:16:24 PM
So, had I not intervened this would have gone on for a lot longer? :P It would have been possible to cease, yet you chose not to, why?
Please ask one question at a time. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 28, 2006, 02:18:12 PM
If you hadn't intervened, it would've eventually been split and moved to a Star Wars-related\the Useless Conv thread. I'd have done it myself, actually.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 29, 2006, 04:15:58 PM
Eventually, yes. But as you've heard Yonkey state, spam can stay and settle for years. :P

But then you never answered my questions. You just told me what would have happened had I not intervened, you didn't tell me what I asked which was why you chose not to stop it, before I decided to press charges. :P

And I'm very sorry, your honor, it shan't happen again.


Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 29, 2006, 04:30:36 PM
I chose not to, because there weren't that many off-topic posts to split. I didn't think it far enough to warrent a split yet.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 29, 2006, 04:39:58 PM
For how much longer do you think it would have gone on?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 29, 2006, 04:42:50 PM
Not too long. Really, a court case for something like this is quite trivial. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on June 29, 2006, 04:50:14 PM
But There are people who can make it realy long. :P
* starts seuing and seuing again * :o
Now it will take a bit longer. ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 29, 2006, 05:00:13 PM
Not too long. Really, a court case for something like this is quite trivial. :P
It also adds to post counts :P

No further questions. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 29, 2006, 05:09:48 PM
It also adds to post counts :P

Deloria, don't make me hurt you. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 29, 2006, 05:40:11 PM
Ok Jafar. :P On the day in question, were you and I the only ones spamming?


EDIT: Grammar. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 29, 2006, 05:41:59 PM
No. Rafael, Kelsey, and OB were also involved. Not so much OB though.
Title: Re: Raforever vs. Almighty Princess Rosella
Post by: Yonkey on June 29, 2006, 05:44:09 PM
Correct, but for the record there was also someone else.  Could you please read out the author of this piece of spam:

acts of ebilness?  ;D

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 29, 2006, 05:47:46 PM
Hmm...it wasn't in the stream of off-topic posts she noted, but it's off-topic, and it's Deloria! XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 29, 2006, 05:51:23 PM
DUN DUN DUNN!!!! *audience whispers and annoyingly disrupts courtroom*

*Ahem*  Also, as stated in Exhibit B:
People who post in my threade automatically swear fealty to me, there are exceptions but he's not one of them. :P

Is it not possible that your off-topic posts were caused by this fabricated rule made up by Deloria as an excuse to sue you?! :o

:P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on June 29, 2006, 05:53:02 PM
Objection! Leading the witness! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 29, 2006, 05:54:36 PM
*wonders if she's going to be countersued :D*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 29, 2006, 05:57:32 PM
I'll rephrase the question (since CC's not here XD):

Would you state, on your reputation as an Honorable Marshmellow XD, that you have heard of any such treasonous rule any time prior to Deloria's posting?

8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 29, 2006, 05:59:51 PM
I had never heard of the rule until she made that post, and even then, I'm not a citizen of her queendom. I shouldn't be forced to follow her rules outside of it. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 29, 2006, 06:04:18 PM
Thank you. :)

And for the record, you used to be a member of the forum staff. 8) In fact, you were a moderator for this very section, correct?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 29, 2006, 06:05:42 PM
Correct. Keeping Haven in order was one of my main tasks.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 29, 2006, 06:07:53 PM
No offense Neil, but it was kind of an automatic thing, you can see that most everyone who posted in there swore allegiance to me regardless of  the rule. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 29, 2006, 06:09:07 PM
Correct. Keeping Haven in order was one of my main tasks.
XD

So, as a moderator, would you say it was your duty to contribute spam or to clean it up?  8)

No offense Neil, but it was kind of an automatic thing, you can see that most everyone who posted in there swore allegiance to me regardless of  the rule. :P
You're supposed to object, not whisper. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 29, 2006, 06:10:56 PM
Cleaning it up was my duty, though I hesitated. I didn't think it had gotten messy enough to clean up yet.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 29, 2006, 06:17:17 PM
Ok, so just to clarify everything.  You were and I were not the only people spamming during that time.  In fact, you mentioned Raforever, Rosella, OB and even Deloria herself as potential spammers.  Secondly, Deloria conjured up a rule, in the hopes of making you go even further off-topic.  And finally, you mentioned how a forum moderator, even a Haven one, has a duty to keep threads clean.

No further questions, Your Honour. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 29, 2006, 06:21:49 PM
Objection! The rule is neither heinous nor treasonous (how could it be? :P). It's automatic, usually, and at the same time, they get a title and lands and a place at court. Those who don't swear fealty to me, don't get that! :P

The rule was not in the hopes of making the conversation go further off-topic, it was so my court knew that I was their leige and that anyone who posted in my thread had some obligation to feel as though they were in my kingdom and therefore under my rule. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 29, 2006, 06:33:23 PM
Your Honour, this thread is not Deloria's, and thus this court is not hers either.  Her claim to treason has no place in this court of law, and therefore the accusation used against Jafar bears no merit in this case. :jafar:

We'll have to wait for CC to decide whether the objection is sustained or not before you can call your next witness. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 29, 2006, 07:36:49 PM
Objection! Leading the witness! :P
When did you become attorney for the prosecutor again?

Objection! The rule is neither heinous nor treasonous (how could it be? :P). It's automatic, usually, and at the same time, they get a title and lands and a place at court. Those who don't swear fealty to me, don't get that! :P

The rule was not in the hopes of making the conversation go further off-topic, it was so my court knew that I was their leige and that anyone who posted in my thread had some obligation to feel as though they were in my kingdom and therefore under my rule. :P
The Court sees no evidence of Deloria's rule being made up to further off-topic communication so the OBJECTION is SUSTAINED.
Defense may ask the witness another question. If not, he is free to go.

Your Honour, this thread is not Deloria's, and thus this court is not hers either.  Her claim to treason has no place in this court of law, and therefore the accusation used against Jafar bears no merit in this case. :jafar:
Of course this is not Deloria's court. Whatever made you think of that? Jafar is not on trail here, he's only a witness, so he's not accused of anything. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 29, 2006, 08:12:57 PM
The defense submits into evidence Exhibit C, the trail of off-topicness triggered by this "alledged" rule XD:


*sues Jafar for insulting a person of royal bood* :P
That's not a sue-worthy offense. ;P
I call it treason :P
That was hardly treasonous. ;P
Definition of treason: 
disloyalty by virtue of subversive behavior


While the first post is on-topic, the following four are posted outside a court of law. :P Jafar was forced to respond in post #4 of Exhibit C to simply defend himself against the accusation. 

So, my question to Jafar is simple: Was your off-topic post in Exhibit C in direct response to Deloria, or was it not?  8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on June 30, 2006, 04:18:09 AM
It was. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on June 30, 2006, 05:06:59 AM
With all due respect, we are arguing about whether it's a sue-worthy offense, therefor, it can be considered on-topic. :P

No, this isn't my court. What led you to believe that? :P (I was referring to my royal court :P).
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 30, 2006, 07:23:41 AM
It was. :P
No further questions, Your Honour. 8)

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 30, 2006, 08:17:59 AM
With all due respect, we are arguing about whether it's a sue-worthy offense, therefor, it can be considered on-topic. :P
You cannot sue anyone for being disloyal (or committing treason) to yourself outside of your thread. The only thing to do against that, is kick them out of your court.
Will legal counsel (or if the party has no legal counsel, the party itself) please approach the bench?

Just so you know, there are 3 possible sentences I can make:
1) the posts stay as they are
2) the posts get split to 'Useless Conversation'
3) the posts will be deleted, and each deleted post will decrease the user's affected post count by one

No further questions, Your Honour. 8)

XD
The witness is excused.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on June 30, 2006, 08:23:44 AM
Will legal counsel (or if the party has no legal counsel, the party itself) please approach the bench?
Defense agrees with those terms. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Dirk Delshire on July 01, 2006, 12:15:38 AM
D the Jurer: *Whispers to friend* Is a recess coming up soon it's freaking hot in here and I've ran out of books to read. LOL
:argue:  :stabs:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on July 01, 2006, 04:21:06 AM
Here. *gives Dirk Delshire a truly biased book on Richard III :P*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on July 01, 2006, 02:15:35 PM
D the Jurer: *Whispers to friend* Is a recess coming up soon it's freaking hot in here and I've ran out of books to read. LOL
:argue:  :stabs:
The public can leave an enter the court room as many times as they wish. There are no official Court recess times, due to time zone differences. The court room is equipped with air conditioning so it can't get 'freaking hot' as you so eloquently put it. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on July 01, 2006, 02:49:39 PM
* Demands a swimmingpool in the courtroom *
If there's a swimmingpool the public can keep themselves cool. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on July 01, 2006, 02:50:58 PM
But where would you put the inflatable toys? ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: telepathic_cat on July 01, 2006, 04:21:47 PM
*THIS POST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TEH COURT CASE.  IT IS MERELY A COMMENT!!!!!!!*


PS: please take no personal offense at the 'lunatic' and 'idiot', it has nothing do with you as a person, but with your actions in this court. Just to make sure...

OMG!!!  I got complemented!!!!!11  TWICE in the same post!!!!  YAY!!!  ^^
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on July 01, 2006, 05:30:51 PM
Congratulations. :P Your honor, this is slightly distracting...:P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on July 02, 2006, 01:48:33 PM
Congratulations. :P Your honor, this is slightly distracting...:P
I agree. :P  So, call your next witness. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on July 02, 2006, 04:13:03 PM
* Demands a swimmingpool in the courtroom *
If there's a swimmingpool the public can keep themselves cool. 8)
The Court would like to point out there is no space in the court room left to install a swimming pool. Besides that, swimming pools have nothing to do with the legal system. 8)

Your honor, this is slightly distracting...:P
That's why I had him escorted out of the room. Please take no offense to what he's shouting at the door. :pokerface:

So, call your next witness. XD
The Court concurs with the defense's comment. Next witness please!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on July 03, 2006, 02:46:25 AM
I call Raforever to the stand.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Raforever on July 14, 2006, 09:20:52 PM
*arrives*

What did i do? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on July 16, 2006, 09:07:30 AM
XD

Nothing, I just wanted to ask a few questions. :P

Please be seated. :P

Now, did you participate in the aforementioned spamming?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Raforever on July 16, 2006, 09:28:28 AM
I see no spam, i speak no spam, i hear no spam XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on July 16, 2006, 09:30:34 AM
Your honor, looking back at the posts, I would consider that a lie. :P
I see no spam, i speak no spam, i hear no spam XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on July 16, 2006, 09:52:07 AM
You forgot to get him to swear to tell the truth. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Raforever on July 16, 2006, 09:58:36 AM
Yes, i suposse thats important ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on July 16, 2006, 12:57:50 PM
Fine. :P

Raf, do you sollemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you the admin of this great site? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Raforever on July 16, 2006, 01:20:20 PM
*looks at Neil*
heheh sure, i swear XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on July 16, 2006, 04:01:50 PM
Now will you please answer the question that I stated before? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Raforever on July 21, 2006, 08:10:30 AM
You'll have to tell me which spam we're talking about before :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on August 20, 2006, 05:02:44 AM
I've dropped the case, I just neglected to make an announcement about it until now.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on August 20, 2006, 05:20:14 AM
And so, justice prevails! 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Petra Rocks on August 20, 2006, 12:37:00 PM
You know, on page three of this CC violated the Anglo-saxon legal principle of no double jepordy...  :sneaky:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on August 20, 2006, 03:16:46 PM
You know, on page three of this CC violated the Anglo-saxon legal principle of no double jepordy...  :sneaky:
Legal principle of no double jepordy ???

EDIT: Almost forgot: Case closed.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Raforever on August 20, 2006, 03:31:57 PM
And i STILL don't know what happened :P

*wobbles outa the court room*  ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Petra Rocks on August 20, 2006, 03:43:00 PM
Actually it's spelled "Jeopardy"  ::) but it means you can't be tried for the same crime twice. Under US law that means that no matter what new evidence is brought up after the trial is over, you still can't be tried more than once after you are found innocent.  I think it even means no new evidence can be brought up after the jury is sworn in, but don't quote me on that.  In most other nations a second trial can begin if "compelling" new evidence is found.  The UK changed away in 2003.    IIRC India of all nations is only large nation to follow the US model, but don't quote me on that either.  ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Raforever on August 20, 2006, 03:51:11 PM
So THATS why trials take so long :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Petra Rocks on August 20, 2006, 04:02:25 PM
  I don't think it adds to trial's length.  I'm not aware of anyone dragging a trial out so that more evidence can be found, that's why they wait until the investigation is over before they have trial.  ;D  It was originally meant to stop the government (or anyone else) from wearing a person out with legal fees and time in court by bringing the same charge against them again and again.   :) But US law is pretty differant from most other countries in that area, so I have no idea what things are like in Brazil.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Raforever on August 20, 2006, 05:46:47 PM
One word: slow :P
That's how things are.. well.. usually ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on August 20, 2006, 09:43:42 PM
trials are slower if the jusry takes too long. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on August 22, 2006, 03:31:16 PM
Actually it's spelled "Jeopardy"  ::) but it means you can't be tried for the same crime twice. Under US law that means that no matter what new evidence is brought up after the trial is over, you still can't be tried more than once after you are found innocent.  I think it even means no new evidence can be brought up after the jury is sworn in, but don't quote me on that.  In most other nations a second trial can begin if "compelling" new evidence is found.  The UK changed away in 2003.    IIRC India of all nations is only large nation to follow the US model, but don't quote me on that either.  ::)
On that case, at that moment, the trial actually never started, due to a lack of evidence. There was nobody find guilty nor innocent. IIRC, there wasn't even a Jury yet. But anyway, the TSL Court is an international one, and in that one when 'compelling' new evidence is released, a trial can be reopened, even when it's already concluded (which that one wasn't). That's the Court's prerogative. It's strange in the US even new compelling evidence won't be admitted as new evidence to repopen the court. What if such new evidence shows the accused, who was found guilty, undeniably innocent (which would be what the accused said all along)? (*thinks there's some grammatical error in this last sentence*)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Petra Rocks on August 22, 2006, 05:05:04 PM
Actually I read

Quote
Case dismissed due to lack of evidence. The Court is now retiring.


back on page three.  But whatever, I have no knowledge of TSL jurisprudence.  ::)


Quote
What if such new evidence shows the accused, who was found guilty, undeniably innocent (which would be what the accused said all along)?


 I'm pretty sure that retrials are allowed in that case.  I'm not a lawyer but I recall some recent cases where new DNA testing technologies proved people innocent and they were released so I guess it must be allowed.  ;D The US system of justice is designed to make it very hard to convict anyone.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on August 22, 2006, 07:12:31 PM
if there's jeopardy, can we play it?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on August 23, 2006, 03:46:54 PM
Play this (http://www.tfd.com/jeopardy). 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on August 23, 2006, 05:50:54 PM
I think he meant something more along the lines of this. :P (http://www.jeopardy.com/)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on August 23, 2006, 07:47:34 PM
i was thinking along the lines of the 2nd one. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on August 24, 2006, 03:23:43 PM
I think he meant something more along the lines of this. :P (http://www.jeopardy.com/)
Ofcourse he did. That was not the only 'jeopardy' I came across on my search, but you clearly can't play mine. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on October 23, 2006, 12:54:36 PM
Can  I bring charges against  Yonkey alias Neil Rodrigues? He committed a serious crime..... He didn't hugged his teddy bear enough. Now his teddy bear is suffering terrible psychological troubles like not sleeping well and feeling lonely.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on October 23, 2006, 02:25:31 PM
Awww.  Actually, I think I sold all my teddy bears in a garage sale about a decade ago...  So someone's hugging them, but it's just not me. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on October 23, 2006, 05:17:24 PM
the defence pleads not guilty!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Petra Rocks on October 23, 2006, 08:26:42 PM
Do we have any witnesses.  ;D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on October 23, 2006, 09:24:17 PM
My mom... but I doubt she'd remember. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on October 23, 2006, 11:58:29 PM
another witness:
to the teddy bear doctor

why is the teddy bear to the the teddy bear doctor?

His owner wasn't hugging him enough. :no:
......

only 3 people could have known what was wrong whit your teddy bear:
1  your teddy bear  himself (definitely not you)
2  the teddy bear doctor    (don't believe you are the teddy bear doctor)
3 the perpetrator

Now how could you have known he wasn't hugged enough whitout being one of those three?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on October 24, 2006, 07:10:16 AM
Easy.  I never said it was my teddy bear. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on October 24, 2006, 08:28:23 AM
that's treu but how could you know that teddy bear  wasn't hugged enough?
anly 3 know of it:
1  your teddy bear  himself (definitely not you)
2  the teddy bear doctor    (don't believe you are the teddy bear doctor)
3 the perpetrator
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on October 24, 2006, 08:39:39 AM
None of the above...  I used deductive reasoning. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on October 24, 2006, 06:08:46 PM
the defence calls "mr. teddy" to that stand.

*walks up*  do you feel loved mr. teddy?  *mr teddy nods*  does neil love you? *mr teddy nods* does he hug you enough? *mr teddy nods and runs over to hug neil*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on October 24, 2006, 07:30:44 PM
Awwww! <3

*teddy bear starts choking Neil*

Ackk- hekklp!! :dead:

*tosses Mr. Teddy through the air and lands on Pacman's face*

Ahh, much better! ;D  ...Pacman? ???


;P

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Petra Rocks on October 24, 2006, 07:32:32 PM
Order in the court! Where's the Baliff.  ;D :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on October 24, 2006, 07:36:36 PM
Order in the court! Where's the Baliff.  ;D :P
Good question... I could have used one when that bear was mauling me. ::)

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Petra Rocks on October 24, 2006, 07:56:08 PM
The bear was mauling you.! :o Maybe you should be in court for possession of a vicious animal instead.  ;D  ;)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on October 25, 2006, 10:13:14 AM
Awwww! <3

*teddy bear starts choking Neil*

Ackk- hekklp!! :dead:

*tosses Mr. Teddy through the air and lands on Pacman's face*

Ahh, much better! ;D  ...Pacman? ???


;P
so now you tell us this is your teddy bear. Maybe this act was because the teddy bear was to much frustrated because he didn't get enough hugs. You even didn't want to hug him here but you threw him away  :o



Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on October 25, 2006, 01:05:12 PM
He still wasn't my teddy bear.  Mine were never that insane. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on October 25, 2006, 01:24:56 PM
He still wasn't my teddy bear.  Mine were never that insane. :P
Yonkey, I Gilgamesh take you to count for animal mistreatment.
You should shame yourself throwing whit animaltoys. XD
You must know that everything has a soul inside and now you almost killed one. :P

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on October 25, 2006, 01:30:02 PM
But... it was self-defense! :'(

Actually, this would make a good case! XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Petra Rocks on October 27, 2006, 04:34:51 PM
Quote
Actually, this would make a good case!

 I think it is making a good case. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on October 28, 2006, 01:19:45 PM
*gets up and limps back to seat*
your honor, niel was simply defending himself.  if he had not, he might have been severly wounded, like me. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on October 28, 2006, 02:45:40 PM
Your Honour, look at what this vicious teddy bear did to this poor innocent child! :-\  Clearly, a "hug" is the last thing this beast wanted. :no:  This young man will never be able to use capital letters in his sentences again! :'(

*stranger runs up and whispers something into Neil's ear*

Erm... the Defence requests that last line be stricken from the record. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on October 30, 2006, 03:46:08 PM
Actually, I think I sold all my teddy bears in a garage sale about a decade ago...
What? :o *sues* (Oh wait, the Court can't sue by itself. :P)

Order in the court! Where's the Baliff.  ;D :P
Are you petitioning for the position? :pokerface:

Your Honour, look at what this vicious teddy bear did to this poor innocent child! :-\  Clearly, a "hug" is the last thing this beast wanted. :no: This young man will never be able to use capital letters in his sentences again! :'(

*stranger runs up and whispers something into Neil's ear*

Erm... the Defence requests that last line be stricken from the record. XD
The Court agrees. /me has the last line stricken from the record.
The Court is inclined to think that sort of behavior of the bear was caused by its long absence from the accused's/defendant's influence. :scholar:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on October 30, 2006, 04:02:55 PM
*objects to inclination* ;P

Let the record show that Mr. Teddy has no relation whatsoever to the Defendant.  This foreign bear is clearly some deranged circus animal that the Prosecution permitted into court.  In fact...

The Defence calls Mr. Teddy to the stand. 8) [icarus can speak on Mr. Teddy's behalf XD]
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on October 30, 2006, 05:56:51 PM
so, mr. teddy,  please tell the court your name.
umm.....nevermind.
mr. teddy, do you feel HAPPY?! :D :) :D :) :)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on October 31, 2006, 09:56:40 AM
Let me translate what mr. teddy just said:

My name is hug me.... hug me please?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on October 31, 2006, 05:27:26 PM
ok, mr. hug me. *gets hugged* STOP THAT!!

do you feel neglected mr. hug me? *is hugged again* I TOLD YOU TO STOP THAT!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 02, 2006, 09:51:08 AM
*tears come in teddy bears eyes*

translation:
The last time I saw my owner Yonkey was when he was still a small kid. After a few years he threw me away and since than I never seen him. The only thing I really wanted was one hug a day.

*teddy bear turns to pacman*
don't you really want a hug?  :'(
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 02, 2006, 09:59:20 AM
Awwww. That's devastating. :'(

::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 02, 2006, 06:36:30 PM
there you have it!!  someone replaced neil with his evil clone!!  neil would never do such a thing!! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 02, 2006, 10:01:53 PM
there you have it!!  someone replaced neil with his evil clone!!  neil would never do such a thing!! :P
Wait... so I was the one who got sold in the garage sale? ???

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 03, 2006, 12:02:49 AM
there you have it!!  someone replaced neil with his evil clone!!  neil would never do such a thing!! :P
So you claim that Neil alias Yonkey is actually  a clone? But where is the real one than?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 03, 2006, 10:12:54 AM
Interesting...so when did the imposter replace Yonkey? ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on November 03, 2006, 10:34:34 PM
What if Neil IS the evil twin? :o
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 04, 2006, 04:38:31 AM
Clones!! Now two for the price of one. :raf:
Oops, act like you all didn't heard that. XD

I never make human clones, only animals. ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 04, 2006, 09:26:06 AM
I never make human clones, only animals. ::)
So, if you cloned Mr. Teddy... who cloned me? :o

;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 04, 2006, 01:26:22 PM
mr teddy wasnt cloned.  you were.  you got sold in a garage sale and your evil twin was raised by your parents.  then you came back and he died of the kinglfarm disease. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 04, 2006, 02:12:29 PM
Ahhh. :)

Wait, what? :stars:

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 05, 2006, 12:17:23 AM
How do we know he was the evil twin? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 05, 2006, 09:19:01 AM
How do we know he was the evil twin? :P
You don't... :suffer: :angel:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 06, 2006, 04:35:19 AM
But still he doesn't want to hug mr. hug me.
So is this still the clone?  :o
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 06, 2006, 04:52:02 AM
If Mr. Teddy wants to be hugged that badly, he should go to Australia. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on November 06, 2006, 05:01:56 AM
Is that where they make Huggies diapers? ???
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 06, 2006, 05:07:27 AM
No. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr3x_RRJdd4)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on November 06, 2006, 05:49:44 AM
I see...but why restrict the free hugs to Australia? Why not let it expand to other places? He should be able to get free hugs whereever he travels!
But i guess we'll save that for another case. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 06, 2006, 01:11:08 PM
I don't want to have to collect 10'000 signatures in each country just so Mr. Teddy can hug someone. ::) It's called laziness. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 06, 2006, 03:40:44 PM
yes, but mr teddy can hug whomever he chooses.

and neil is real watch*hits neil*
neil-ow!!
me-told ya :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 07, 2006, 05:55:42 AM
No one ever said he didn't exist. :P We're just talking about the possibility of his having a clone. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 08, 2006, 06:29:49 PM
Is this discussion relevant to the current case?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 09, 2006, 04:42:57 AM
Extremely. What if it's Neil's clone that sold the Teddy bear and wouldn't hug him?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 09, 2006, 09:29:18 AM
And what if the Teddy bear's clone wouldn't hug the other Neil clone? :o

;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 09, 2006, 11:27:24 AM
Ladies and gentlemen I present you all the new and improved cloningmachine! ;D
It looks like an ordenairy elevator in this courtroom, but it clones the animal inside and brings it to the elevastor next to it. ::)

I must warn you not to get in the elevator.
The package told me it can clone people also. :o
Like I already have said "I haven't treid it to clone humans (yet)".
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 09, 2006, 12:36:38 PM
Like I already have said "I haven't treid it to clone humans (yet)".
Care to be the first? XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 09, 2006, 02:54:43 PM
Care to be the first? XD
No, I'll skip this one.

I found a way to hugg a bear and doing other kind of hugs. :P
http://www.millan.net/funp/cards/hug.html (http://www.millan.net/funp/cards/hug.html)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Shades2585 on November 09, 2006, 05:35:35 PM
LOL That was cute!  ;D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 09, 2006, 07:37:38 PM
Ladies and gentlemen I present you all the new and improved cloningmachine! ;D
It looks like an ordenairy elevator in this courtroom, but it clones the animal inside and brings it to the elevastor next to it. ::)

I must warn you not to get in the elevator.
The package told me it can clone people also. :o
Like I already have said "I haven't treid it to clone humans (yet)".
The Court does not tolerate a (possible) cloning machine in its domain. Please take this contraption outside, thank you. :scholar:

I found a way to hugg a bear and doing other kind of hugs. :P
http://www.millan.net/funp/cards/hug.html (http://www.millan.net/funp/cards/hug.html)
Nice. :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 10, 2006, 01:33:17 AM
The Court does not tolerate a (possible) cloning machine in its domain. Please take this contraption outside, thank you. :scholar:
Well this should be used as evidence in this case that cloning Yonkey is possible if he has stand inside on elevator like these.

ps. There must be a company that also has an elevator-cloning-machine.
It might be even closer to his work than he thinks.
* thinks about Cecar beng a clone also * XD
It could be!! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 10, 2006, 07:11:11 AM
but the case is about yonkey not hugging teddy enough not if cloning is possible.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 10, 2006, 05:33:49 PM
it was neils evil clone that didnt hug mr teddy!! not neil!! ;D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 10, 2006, 07:20:46 PM
Shame on him/me! >:(

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 11, 2006, 07:10:31 AM
But why  didn't Neil alias Yonkey want to hug mr teddy here in courtroom?
If this Neil is the good one he should be wanting to hug his own teddybear?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 11, 2006, 08:36:39 AM
Did you forget what Mr. Teddy did to Pacman already? ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 11, 2006, 01:50:09 PM
Did you forget what Mr. Teddy did to Pacman already? ;P
Mr. Teddy wanted only to hug him. Is there evil in giving a hug to someone?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 11, 2006, 03:35:50 PM
maybe that wasnt the real mr teddy  :sneaky:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 11, 2006, 03:57:22 PM
Maybe Neil isn't Yonkey. ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 11, 2006, 04:07:09 PM
Maybe this court isn't a court! :o

XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 11, 2006, 04:08:39 PM
I agree! :P It has to be a thread, it just has to be. Someone's just trying to trick us into believing it's a court.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 12, 2006, 04:52:02 AM
Order order in this court, please.
If not this show will be over. :P

* goes backstage asking CC to come and make the public thinking it's a real court * XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 15, 2006, 04:01:45 PM
Well this should be used as evidence in this case that cloning Yonkey is possible if he has stand inside on elevator like these.
If it were to be used as evidence:
a) the test would be conducted somewhere outside, in controlled conditions and with a living creature that is easily disposed of and is of a species that does not rouse animal protection groups of any sort. Like cockreaches for instance.
b) Apart from testing time, the contraption would be in a locked room and a miniature facsimile contraption would be placed on the evidence desk.

Maybe this court isn't a court! :o

XD
Hey! :bob:
The Court resents that statement and wishes for it to be stricken from the record.

I agree! :P It has to be a thread, it just has to be. Someone's just trying to trick us into believing it's a court.
Just as your Kingdom (Queendom?) is located in a thread, this Court is also located in a (this) thread. However, that does not diminish this Court's validity as an objective arbitrator between TSL forum members.

Order order in this court, please.
If not this show will be over. :P

* goes backstage asking CC to come and make the public thinking it's a real court * XD
Thank you. However, when did this Court appoint you as bailiff? BTW, were those two replies clear enough for ya?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 15, 2006, 05:49:07 PM
maybe THAT wasnt the real cc!!  dont listen to him!!  the cloning machine is going around!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 16, 2006, 08:33:10 AM
CC is real and that was he posting! That was definitely the real CC. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 16, 2006, 08:46:27 AM
maybe THAT wasnt the real cc!!  dont listen to him!!  the cloning machine is going around!!
If you keep talking this way you will probably thrown out of the courtroom
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 16, 2006, 08:47:41 AM
Interesting... so if Mr. Teddy keeps "hugging" that way, will he get thrown out too? ;-D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 16, 2006, 08:50:27 AM
*wonders what would happen if someone random hugged Teddy to keep him appeased and if the case would then be dropped and this thread would then fall into obscurity...:'(* No one hug him!! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 16, 2006, 08:55:00 AM
*wonders what would happen if someone random hugged Teddy to keep him appeased and if the case would then be dropped and this thread would then fall into obscurity...:'(* No one hug him!! :P
He probably will be quiet for a while but still he's blaming Yonkey
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on November 16, 2006, 11:45:43 AM
If you keep talking this way you will probably thrown out of the courtroom
...and into the Asylum XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 16, 2006, 12:08:20 PM
Is Mr. Teddy's padded cell ready? :)

XB
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on November 16, 2006, 12:21:47 PM
I was thinking a cage maybe more suitable for him! XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 16, 2006, 01:43:46 PM
Interesting... so if Mr. Teddy keeps "hugging" that way, will he get thrown out too? ;-D
I object!!!
Yonkey must teach the bear not to hugg him to good.
Mr. bear has become older and stronger, and doesn't know how to hugg other than using all his power in the hugg. XD
To make a long story short.
The bear needs soft-hugging-training. :raf:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 17, 2006, 11:22:26 AM
teddy:  :'(
you want to lock him up on a place where he never gets a hug?
isolation cel in the asylum?
The only thing he wants is a hug a day. I get the feeling none of you ever hugged a tedybear.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 17, 2006, 11:24:16 AM
That's devastating. :'( *gives Teddy a hug* :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 17, 2006, 01:10:14 PM
Teddy!! Don't hug Deloria that hard.
* Teddy softens it's grip on Deloria * ;D
Good Teddy.

off record:"
* gives teddy some wool * ;D
they do anything for that. ::)

On record:
See it's easy if you know what to say. :P

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 17, 2006, 02:38:03 PM
/me stops suffocating
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 19, 2006, 11:16:23 AM
It seems court's is taking a break.
Well in that case.
* takes out his sandwiches and starts to eat them * :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 19, 2006, 01:01:14 PM
 :o thats my evidence!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on November 19, 2006, 01:16:13 PM
hmm... I think it's safe to say that we're better off leaving the evidence where it is now...  :X  :no:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 19, 2006, 02:38:01 PM
:o thats my evidence!!
Then you shouldn't leave it on the desk where I can take it. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 19, 2006, 02:43:12 PM
:o thats my evidence!!
You could sue him, it's the right thread. ::)  :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 19, 2006, 03:51:24 PM
maybe THAT wasnt the real cc!!  dont listen to him!!  the cloning machine is going around!!
The president of the Court would like to inform Mr. Pacman that he has certain security measures at his disposal to ascertain that nobody puts him in any cloning machine.

CC is real and that was he posting! That was definitely the real CC. :P
The Court wishes to express its gratitude against Miss Deloria for defending its president's stance.

Interesting... so if Mr. Teddy keeps "hugging" that way, will he get thrown out too? ;-D
If Mister Teddy will not refrain himself from acting that way, the Court will take any means at its disposal to make sure he doesn't.:scholar:

...and into the Asylum XD
I thought Pacman already was in the Asylum, but has been given temporary leaves to appear in this Courtroom, escorted of course. :pleased:

Is Mr. Teddy's padded cell ready? :)

XB
Why would Mister Teddy need a padded cell?

I was thinking a cage maybe more suitable for him! XD
The Court objects to putting sentient beings in cages, unless absolutely necessary.

Yonkey must teach the bear not to hugg him to good.
Mr. bear has become older and stronger, and doesn't know how to hugg other than using all his power in the hugg. XD
To make a long story short.
The bear needs soft-hugging-training. :raf:
The Court thinks Mister Yonkey might not be the best-suited person to conduct the soft-hugging-training, as Mister Gilgamesh suggested.

On record:
See it's easy if you know what to say. :P
The Court appoints Mister Gilgamesh as possible soft-hugging-trainer for Mister Teddy.

It seems court's is taking a break.
Well in that case.
* takes out his sandwiches and starts to eat them * :P
Please do not eat or drink anything inside the Courtroom. There is a cafeteria located in the building where you can do that. Thank you for your consideration.

:o thats my evidence!!
How can Gilgamesh's sandwiches be your evidence?

hmm... I think it's safe to say that we're better off leaving the evidence where it is now...  :X  :no:
Once deposited, the evidence must always be left on the evidence table.

You could sue him, it's the right thread. ::)  :P
Unfortunately, not the right time. This Court is currently still bending over the case of Mister Teddy and Mister Yonkey.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on November 19, 2006, 04:33:25 PM
Well I was referring to the teddy bear being thrown in a cage. But if you believe that pacman should be thrown in a cage then I can't complain... :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 20, 2006, 11:35:41 AM
I can get Mr. Teddy!
Great, now my plans to conquer the world will come true!! ;D
Did I just said something about worlddomination? :P
Well, Teddy come to me to get your aggression hugging training.
 :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 20, 2006, 01:04:08 PM
You want to talk to him so he will plan a way to take over the world?
That is realy mean.

And mr teddy accept his hugging therapy. He only suggest that Yonkey should follow such a training too so it never happens again that a teddy of yonkey will sue him for not hugging.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 20, 2006, 02:59:42 PM
Well I was referring to the teddy bear being thrown in a cage. But if you believe that pacman should be thrown in a cage then I can't complain... :P

why am i being caged?!?!  were all prisoners of the man.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 20, 2006, 03:20:13 PM
were all prisoners of the man.
Well, it's better than being a prisoner of Mr. Teddy. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on November 20, 2006, 03:49:28 PM
why am i being caged?!?!  were all prisoners of the man.
I'm sorry... but it's the doctors orders. :-\ :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 20, 2006, 04:25:01 PM
Well I was referring to the teddy bear being thrown in a cage. But if you believe that pacman should be thrown in a cage then I can't complain... :P
The Court was referring to Mister Teddy as being a sentient being.

I can get Mr. Teddy!
Great, now my plans to conquer the world will come true!! ;D
Did I just said something about worlddomination? :P
Well, Teddy come to me to get your aggression hugging training.
 :P
Please read the Court's reply very carefully. It said possible. Of course, by posting this, you are seriously reducing your chance.

And mr teddy accept his hugging therapy. He only suggest that Yonkey should follow such a training too so it never happens again that a teddy of yonkey will sue him for not hugging.
Mister Teddy and Mister Yonkey are still on trial and until a verdict has been spoken such training cannot start, if that were (part of) the Court's decision.

why am i being caged?!?!  were all prisoners of the man.
Donta worry! Nobody-a is being caged! (faked Italian accent). :P No, seriously there will be no caging under this Court's Presidency

I'm sorry... but it's the doctors orders. :-\ :P
Doctor?
[shout]Is there a doctor in the Court?[/shout] ::)
The Court has not appointed a physician in this case (yet), and even if it had, the physician can only advise The Court to take certain measures but it is always the Court's decision!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 22, 2006, 02:31:41 AM
Please read the Court's reply very carefully. It said possible. Of course, by posting this, you are seriously reducing your chance.

Thanks, I was thinking that I had to train that bear.
Then I wouldn't have any time for my worlddominationplans to be put into motion.
selling the moon in exchange for earth. XD
I still have to think a little bit longer if my plan will succeed. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 22, 2006, 03:26:01 PM
i hereby acuse gilgamesh of trying to take over the world!! ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 22, 2006, 07:52:53 PM
DUN DUN DUNNNN... :o


Wait a sec, we knew that already! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 23, 2006, 02:43:03 PM
XD

I hereby accuse the majority of active forumers, of the same. ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 23, 2006, 02:47:21 PM
I already have found out that the moon isn't good enough, so I can't sell it for earth.
Maybe if I give Mars a few suns and some small moons I'll get earth. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 23, 2006, 02:56:26 PM
Oh, fine! Be that way, but the moon's perfectly good enough for me. ;P

But I agree, we should bribe Mars in order to gain another Earth. :yes:

 
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 23, 2006, 04:04:08 PM
i hereby acuse gilgamesh of trying to take over the world!! ::)
Hold that thought, like, until the current case has been ruled. :scholar:

I hereby accuse the majority of active forumers, of the same. ::)
This semi-active forumer denies all accusations. :pleased:

Is it possible for both parties to give their final statement, after which the Court will go into deliberation behind closed doors and after careful consideration of all arguments will render its verdict, since we have no jury this time?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 23, 2006, 05:24:46 PM
*vaguely remembers what the case was even about but decides to make statement anyway XD*


This case is about a bear, and his owner.  The bear in question is Mr. Teddy, however I am not his owner. 

*sappy music plays*
Back when I was a little boy, I had hundreds of teddy bears.  (Ok, maybe not hundreds, more like 2. :P)  I cared for them greatly, and they were hugged often.  As time went on, I relied on them less and less, until the day came when they were no longer needed.  They were sold together, along with other toys from my childhood to some family that would enjoy them as much as I did. :)

Jump ahead 15 years or so, to the present day.  I stand accused of not hugging teddy bears, and one that goes by the name of Mr. Teddy, decided to use this court to viciously attack me, based on such a ludacris premise. :no: 

Not only did his definition of "hug" equate to strangulation, he also attacked that young man *points to Pacsanta* errr... that young man *points to Pacman*. XD

There is no place in this world for a bear like Mr. Teddy.  Confining him to the Asylum would put the Asylum staff and patients at risk.  Allowing Mr. Teddy to roam free is also not an option, and assigning ownership of Mr. Teddy to Gilgamesh is not much better.  Gilgamesh has said he would train the bear to help him with world domination, but for all we know, Mr. Teddy would take all the credit. :-\  Oh, and the whole world domination = ebil thing. XB

Mr. Teddy should pay for all the pain and suffering he caused.  The only way to do that is to confine him to a steel cage for eternity, so that he can never harm another soul again.

8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 23, 2006, 08:49:06 PM
hey!! im the lawyer i have to say it. :P

closing statement:
"it" *points to post before*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 24, 2006, 08:39:26 AM
XD

Ohh, you're the lawyer!  I thought you were just the dude whose face got attacked by the bear. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 24, 2006, 09:27:14 AM
then here is the story from mr teddy
okay it's right you've sold him but does that make you less guilty?
You sold him to some kids and after some years they didn't want him either. The one day even used him as an astronaut by using firecrackers. You sold mr teddy to those kids.
mr teddy hugs so aggressive because in those years he had no hugs at all. He doesn't know how to hug properly.
In the past you where the one that gave him hugs. Now at the time he needs you the most, you don't want to know him.
It was wrong that he hugged you that aggressively but how would you feel if you never had a single hug in the past decade?


EDIT (By Yonkey): Removed quote tag, fixed spelling and some grammar. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 24, 2006, 09:36:31 AM
I hereby accuse the majority of active forumers, of the same. ::)
This semi-active forumer denies all accusations. :pleased:
Forgive me, I didn't mean to imply you were among the ones insane enough to actually think of taking over the world.  :-\
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on November 24, 2006, 03:17:07 PM
Well, I think Professor Plum did it. Er, wait. This isn't the Clue thread? ???
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 25, 2006, 12:14:35 PM
he DID do it!! in the hall with the candlestick!!

how can you kill someone with a candlestick?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 25, 2006, 12:30:52 PM
I sue CC for hurting FIREANTS!!! :o
Kicking them out of the asylum is sure cruel.  :yes:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 25, 2006, 04:12:25 PM
he DID do it!! in the hall with the candlestick!!

how can you kill someone with a candlestick?
If it were a thick enough candlestick, I suppose you could whack them over the head with it a few hundred times and get a result. ::)

He's the judge. :-\ I don't think that can work. Besides, Fannatics get immunity.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on November 26, 2006, 03:54:27 AM
he DID do it!! in the hall with the candlestick!!

how can you kill someone with a candlestick?
Jam it into there eye socket hard and fast?

Did I go to far? XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 26, 2006, 12:02:46 PM
then here is the story from mr teddy
okay it's right you've sold him but does that make you less guilty?
You sold him to some kids and after some years they didn't want him either. The one day even used him as an astronaut by using firecrackers. You sold mr teddy to those kids.
mr teddy hugs so aggressive because in those years he had no hugs at all. He doesn't know how to hug properly.
In the past you where the one that gave him hugs. Now at the time he needs you the most, you don't want to know him.
It was wrong that he hugged you that aggressively but how would you feel if you never had a single hug in the past decade?


EDIT (By Yonkey): Removed quote tag, fixed spelling and some grammar. :P
Objection, Your Honor! Mr. Teddy's defense has been tampered with! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 26, 2006, 01:08:51 PM
Objection, Your Honor! Mr. Teddy's defense has been tampered with! :P
LOL I just fixed some minor tag & spelling mistakes, the rest is the same. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 26, 2006, 01:43:29 PM
 Icarus, does your argument look different to you now? ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 26, 2006, 04:05:59 PM
I sue CC for hurting FIREANTS!!! :o
Kicking them out of the asylum is sure cruel.  :yes:
The Court has received a statement from CC about this matter which states:
'a) No fire-ants were harmed in their evacuation from the Asylum.
b) Fire-ants don't belong in buildings, they're far much better suited to outdoor conditions so what you consider cruel is what I consider an improvement.' end of statement


Icarus, does your argument look different to you now? ;P
The Court awaits a statement from Mr. Teddy's lawyer before it will start considering both party's statements in the President (of the Court)'s office. Please bear in mind deliberation this may take some time.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 27, 2006, 01:53:08 AM
Well in the previous post it sounded more like mr teddy would say. But for this one time I let you go whit it that there are no serious things altered.
(and don't think I will think milder of you now you fixed the spelling and grammer errors. I still think you're guilty)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 27, 2006, 03:53:37 PM
*hugs mr teddy*  all he wants is a hug *gets strangled and dies*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 27, 2006, 04:02:03 PM
*hugs mr teddy*  all he wants is a hug *gets strangled and dies*
*performs CPR (?) and revives pacman* Phew! 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 27, 2006, 04:06:30 PM
Your Honor, clearly this animal needs to be caged immediately! >:( (The bear, not Pacman :P)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Farquhar on November 27, 2006, 11:13:04 PM
But surely with enough time and determination a teddy bear could squeeze through the bars of a cage to wreak havoc once again! :P

A box would be more suitable, don't you think?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 27, 2006, 11:51:17 PM
your all big meanies. All he wants is to hug and whit the proper training he will be able to softly hug people
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 28, 2006, 11:11:54 AM
Why don't you find another teddy which he could play whit.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 28, 2006, 03:54:21 PM
Your Honor, clearly this animal needs to be caged immediately! >:( (The bear, not Pacman :P)
I wouldn't go as far as 'caged', but clearly it needs some sort of refraining. /me orders bailiff to put Mr. Teddy in a white jacket like those nice folks in the Asylum use.
 8)

But surely with enough time and determination a teddy bear could squeeze through the bars of a cage to wreak havoc once again! :P

A box would be more suitable, don't you think?
*voice booms through the loudspeakers* Not the kind of boxes This Court uses, rest assured. However, a box seems to be even worse!
*loudspeakers go quiet again and Court resumes deliberation*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 28, 2006, 04:49:58 PM
why is mr teddy laughing maniacly?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 28, 2006, 06:46:50 PM
why is mr teddy laughing maniacly?
He probably got tips from this guy: :suffer:

;-D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on November 28, 2006, 07:56:17 PM
 XB
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 29, 2006, 03:02:32 AM
Look at this bears eyes!
(http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d99/frankvanos/teddybear01.jpg)
aint it saying that he is huggable? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 29, 2006, 06:32:48 AM
He's cute, but I don't trust him...:sneaky:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 29, 2006, 02:48:00 PM
i cant sleep in the same room as all of my old stuffed animals anymore because of this thread. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 29, 2006, 02:52:06 PM
i cant sleep in the same room as all of my old stuffed animals anymore because of this thread. :P
XD
Awww. :-\

Your Honor, if I may, this thread is traumatizing to some of us in the extreme. :S Might I request that Mr Teddy be forcefully restrained from hugging, if necessary?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on November 29, 2006, 02:55:29 PM
*gives mr teddy a hug*

see I'm not chocking. He can learn from his mistakes.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 29, 2006, 03:05:01 PM
please!!  *attacks mr teddy*  let me sleep!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 29, 2006, 03:36:03 PM
Your Honor, if I may, this thread is traumatizing to some of us in the extreme. :S Might I request that Mr Teddy be forcefully restrained from hugging, if necessary?
/me informs Ms Deloria Mr. Teddy has already been put into a straight jacket.

please!!  *attacks mr teddy*  let me sleep!!
There will not be any attacking of the accused. :scholar:
*Court personnel prevents attack of Mr. Teddy and escorts attacker out of the court room*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on November 29, 2006, 08:12:08 PM
im the victimized lawyer!!  you cant kick me out!! im a lawyer!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Farquhar on November 29, 2006, 11:42:35 PM
Look at this bears eyes!
(http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d99/frankvanos/teddybear01.jpg)
aint it saying that he is huggable? :P


Are ya kiddin, there's murder in those eyes! XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on November 30, 2006, 11:12:24 AM
It's just as huggable as this one
(http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d99/frankvanos/teddybearvroeger01.jpg)
BTW. Yonkey are you that child??  !!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on November 30, 2006, 11:49:27 AM
LOL!  I don't think I ever had a bear that was almost the size of me. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on November 30, 2006, 01:47:55 PM
Yeah, and the infant looks as though it's being strangled! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 01, 2006, 02:57:24 PM
see!!  teddy bears are ebil!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on December 01, 2006, 04:46:29 PM
Quick!  Somebody save the baby! :o

;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Petra Rocks on December 01, 2006, 07:50:52 PM
*Saves baby* See, now you just press esc and click the button to restore. Or just die.  ::) All babies should come with this feature.  :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 01, 2006, 09:57:57 PM
you couldve just taken out the batteries :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on December 02, 2006, 10:58:15 AM
Pacman and Yonkey did't you read the sign??
Hug the bear. :raf:
(http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d99/frankvanos/angrybearman.gif)
This is what happens if you didn't hug it. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 02, 2006, 11:01:56 AM
"if you dont hug the bear, it will attack you."
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on December 02, 2006, 12:29:14 PM
Is that Mr. Teddy? XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on December 02, 2006, 02:15:54 PM
:'( you are all mean against mr. teddy
*hugs mr. teddy*
he didn't choke me and he didn't attacked me
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 03, 2006, 09:38:01 AM
thats because youre his translator :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on December 03, 2006, 10:12:19 AM
thats because youre his translator :P
So? If you listened to your own teddybear when you where still young you would have learned it too.
*Imagines pacman talking to a teddy
how cute  :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 03, 2006, 04:02:41 PM
im the victimized lawyer!!  you cant kick me out!! im a lawyer!!
If a lawyer is misbehaving himself whilst in the Court room he can be kicked out just like anybody else.
Court is looking at venues of co-guilt.

*hugs mr. teddy*
he didn't choke me and he didn't attacked me
thats because youre his translator :P
Nevertheless, it proves Mr. Teddy is capable of proper hugging behavior.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 03, 2006, 07:43:08 PM
but mr teddy chooses to attack me for no reason!!  that has to be against the law!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 04, 2006, 04:05:00 PM
but mr teddy chooses to attack me for no reason!!  that has to be against the law!!
Who's saying you didn't provoke that kind of behavior?
PS: Comments that are not made in bold are not made by he Court.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 04, 2006, 05:52:32 PM
you can check my background.  *shows cc*  i have never had anything to do with mr teddy or his family members.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on December 04, 2006, 06:38:45 PM
Mr. Teddy has family members? :o

:P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 04, 2006, 06:45:50 PM
yes. :P  mrs teddy, lil teddy, senor teddio, and sue
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on December 04, 2006, 06:47:52 PM
LOL Sue??  Was she adopted or something? ;-D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on December 05, 2006, 03:43:19 AM
I don't think she fit in with her last family. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on December 05, 2006, 12:38:04 PM
I demand that they are brought to the court to become witnesses in the defence of Teddy.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 05, 2006, 03:50:15 PM
I demand that they are brought to the court to become witnesses in the defence of Teddy.
And you are...? I thought icarus was representing Mr. Teddy.
And besides that, this Court is already in recess debating the outcome of this case. You can file a complaint if you wish afterwards. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on December 06, 2006, 02:27:14 AM
And you are...?
I'm the one Who is going to mess up this whole court. ::)
There must be a law against courts of any kind.
Only freedom for everyone :D
Wait did I said everyone (even criminals) :o
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 06, 2006, 09:51:10 AM
I don't think she fit in with her last family. :P

erm...sue is a guy. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 06, 2006, 03:26:14 PM
There must be a law against courts of any kind.
Only freedom for everyone :D
What with the freedom to sue somebody else then? :scholar:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 06, 2006, 04:28:56 PM
you cant sue someone!!  sue is a person!! er...stuffed animal!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 12, 2006, 03:37:16 PM
you cant sue someone!!  sue is a person!! er...stuffed animal!!
No, that would be Sue. I'm talking about sue. :pleased:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 12, 2006, 04:09:14 PM
sorry. :( :P  can we imprison mr teddy and get this over with?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on December 15, 2006, 12:25:40 PM
If you do that I'll seu you for hurting such a poor stuffed animal. :P
Animal mistreatment isn't good allowed.
* removes all the sweat on his head *
(I almost said the G-word) :o
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 16, 2006, 10:25:34 AM
fine. :P  *waits for a verdict*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on December 21, 2006, 12:55:35 AM
You're honour, I'm sorry, got caught in traffic. Pacman stole my position, he is not really a lawyer. :P

DUN DUN DUN...
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 21, 2006, 03:37:00 PM
*Court enter the Court room, back from recess and the President of the Court stands up*
Reviewing all the facts this Court has ruled both parties guilty, 50/50.
Mr. Yonkey has clearly lost his inner child. This is an integral part of every male member of this society, without which a man cannot function properly. This has been demonstrated by the abandonment of Mr. Teddy.
Mr. Teddy on the other hand does not know how to properly hug people. In some ways he's become a wild animal. However, he has shown promise in this very court that, with proper incentive, his proper behaviour can be restored.
Henceforth This Court refers both parties to the TSL Asylum, Mr. Yonkey to the human patient section, Mr. Teddy to the Animal Centre.

PS: NOW you know why I opened the Animal Centre. :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 21, 2006, 06:47:49 PM
so THATS why thats there. :P

*turns to neil*  sorry.  i tried.  :-\
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on December 22, 2006, 12:15:03 AM
He's already there for being passive aggressive. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on December 22, 2006, 12:38:23 AM
I won, I finaly won! :D
What a joy to hear.
Wait, I lost also.......
Well I won anyway. :D
You always must look at the bright side of life. :yes:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 22, 2006, 01:04:11 PM
always look on the bright side of life *whistles* ......... always look on the right side of life *whistles*

spamalot. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on December 22, 2006, 02:20:19 PM
Aww, Neil lost his inner child. XD

*hugs Neil* :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 23, 2006, 10:12:48 PM
hes "the man" and we have to stick it to him
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 25, 2006, 05:13:03 PM
He's already there for being passive aggressive. :P
His treatment schedule now also shows treatment for recapturing his "inner child". :scholar:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 25, 2006, 10:02:13 PM
you let inner children run free here?!?!  :o how could you!?!?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on December 26, 2006, 10:34:36 AM
Well, as long as Mr. Teddy isn't running free, it's worth it. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on December 26, 2006, 04:38:31 PM
Well, as long as Mr. Teddy isn't running free, it's worth it. XD
after the training he will be set free Yonkey!! XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on December 26, 2006, 05:55:20 PM
But will Yonkey ever be set free? :sneaky:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 26, 2006, 09:21:03 PM
nobody knows :o
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 27, 2006, 01:51:38 PM
after the training he will be set free Yonkey!! XD
If he responds well to the treatment he's given there, he will. However, that is not necessarily the case. 8)

But will Yonkey ever be set free? :sneaky:
According to the reports the Court has requested concerning mr. Yonkey's condition, up to now he has not shown any sign of an emerging 'inner child' again. :-\ However, it has been noted it's still early on  in this particular treatment so it can still go any way. :scholar:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 28, 2006, 11:03:47 PM
*has wanted to say this very badly*

court dismissed *bangs gavel*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on December 29, 2006, 02:44:40 PM
* watches behind a screen how yonkey gets his shocking :o treatment *
Only for those who feel harm is this spoiler made
Don't mind what I have put above

* looks a teddys treatment *
Nice the room is so cute an huggy
And look there are some little bears kids hugging him. :D

I can see both of them are in good hands. :P

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 29, 2006, 03:50:22 PM
*has wanted to say this very badly*

court dismissed *bangs gavel*
:pokerface: You cannot dismiss the Court! However, since the President of this Court neglected to dismiss it himself when he should have, we'll let it waive and consider your gavel-banging the official dismissal of the Court.

* watches behind a screen how yonkey gets his shocking :o treatment *
Only for those who feel harm is this spoiler made
Don't mind what I have put above

* looks a teddys treatment *
Nice the room is so cute an huggy
And look there are some little bears kids hugging him. :D

I can see both of them are in good hands. :P
The Court has been assured by the Management of the Asylum Mr. Yonkey does not need EST at this moment or in the foreseeable future.And yes, Mr. Teddy's treatment has been a success so far. And of course, Asylum personnel likes to make his treatment as comfortable as possible, as they do with their human patients too, even if they sometimes may tend to disagree. At least, that's what we're being told by its Manager and we have no reason to distrust him.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on December 29, 2006, 03:58:13 PM
The Court has been assured by the Management of the Asylum Mr. Yonkey does not need EST at this moment or in the foreseeable future.And yes, Mr. Teddy's treatment has been a success so far. And of course, Asylum personnel likes to make his treatment as comfortable as possible, as they do with their human patients too, even if they sometimes may tend to disagree. At least, that's what we're being told by its Manager and we have no reason to distrust him.
I didn't say he got EST, but only a shocking treatment.
For example: seeing teddy hugging him. :o
That must be shocking for him. :P
And seeing old movies whit him and teddy on it. :scholar:

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on December 29, 2006, 10:50:08 PM
shocking is bad.  trust me :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on January 01, 2007, 05:30:34 AM
I thank the noble judge for the wise verdict in this case between mr Teddy and mr Yonkey.
I hope both will meet each others once more as true friends and whit the possibility to hug each other at a normal way.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on January 01, 2007, 11:21:16 AM
and hopefully, neil can feel safe with mr teddy in his house
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on January 01, 2007, 03:57:29 PM
shocking is bad.  trust me :P
The Court agrees. The Asylum management has stated it does not want anyone to feel anything shocking, as it might counteract the treatment.

I thank the noble judge for the wise verdict in this case between mr Teddy and mr Yonkey.
I hope both will meet each others once more as true friends and whit the possibility to hug each other at a normal way.
The Court thanks Mr. Icarus for this compliment. It also hopes Mr. Yonkey will find his inner child again, and Mr. Teddy continuing its positive behaviour due to his treatment, resulting in both parties meeting each other and doing what is normal between a man with an active inner child and a teddy bear. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on January 12, 2007, 10:25:06 PM
Bowling! No wait, that's what you do with action figures...
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on January 14, 2007, 09:16:03 PM
we need a new case :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on January 15, 2007, 03:44:29 PM
Bowling! No wait, that's what you do with action figures...
Bowling a teddy bear? The Court suddenly feels the urge to sue Mr. Jafar for this statement.. :pokerface:

Bowling! No wait, that's what you do with action figures...
Got an idea? I can't do it, since that would mean I could no longer be impartial as President of this Court. :-\
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on January 16, 2007, 01:56:33 AM
Bowling! No wait, that's what you do with action figures...
Bowling a teddy bear? The Court suddenly feels the urge to sue Mr. Jafar for this statement.. :pokerface:

Bowling! No wait, that's what you do with action figures...
Got an idea? I can't do it, since that would mean I could no longer be impartial as President of this Court. :-\
Noble judge I want to sue Jafar for using toys in an improperly way.
He was even suggesting to get bowling whit toys.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on January 16, 2007, 07:56:45 PM
seeing that the plaintiff is never here, we cant really have this trial
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on January 17, 2007, 06:20:35 PM
Actually, I meant it as taking your toys to go bowling, not using them as bowling balls\pins. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on January 17, 2007, 08:28:38 PM
id like to see mr teddy bowl. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on January 18, 2007, 03:56:16 PM
seeing that the plaintiff is never here, we cant really have this trial
Who? Icarus? That's not really a reason not to hold a trial.

Actually, I meant it as taking your toys to go bowling, not using them as bowling balls\pins. :P
Suuuuuure. ::)

id like to see mr teddy bowl. :P
Maybe he can, but we haven't found about it yet. :scholar:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 20, 2007, 02:58:37 PM
CC doesn't pacman belong inside the clinic to lean how to treat bears like mr. Teddy?
It seems he has problems whit bears.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on January 20, 2007, 03:07:08 PM
CC doesn't pacman belong inside the clinic to lean how to treat bears like mr. Teddy?
There are more bears out there like Mr. Teddy?! :o :o :o

:P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on January 21, 2007, 03:56:33 PM
There are more bears out there like Mr. Teddy?! :o :o :o

:P
The Court is inclined to deny the existence of other bears just like Mr. Teddy. It is convinced Mr. Yonkey's (mis)treatment of Mr. Teddy cannot have been duplicated anywhere else. :scholar:

ixnay on the oblempay!!  :P
Excuse the Court for not understanding what you are saying and would you please refrain from doing so in this thread? :pokerface:

Now the translatoin in normal english:
I have a problem whit bears, but I will not tell everyone that I don't like them at all.
I want them to be locked up in small cages for the rest of their lives. :o

CC!! Pacman sure has a problem. XB
Somehow the Court doesn't think that is the correct translation and waits for Mr. Pacman to translate it himself. :pleased:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 24, 2007, 01:18:27 AM
That are the first signs of a serious problem.
CC, put him in the program to learn that bears aren't evil.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on January 24, 2007, 03:47:46 PM
it means "i dont want to talk about that. :P"
The Court wishes for pacman to swear that's the correct translation as it's not entirely sure this translation has been posted truthfully. :pokerface:

That are the first signs of a serious problem.
CC, put him in the program to learn that bears aren't evil.
The Court wishes to see Gilgameshe's credentials as a psychologist. Furthermore, even if he was, he has not been appointed by this Court to assess mr. Pacman's mental health.
Furthermore, this CC you are talking about, would that be the Manager of the TSL Asylum? I'm afraid he isn't present in this Court room, as he's far too busy managing his Asylum (obviously).
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on January 25, 2007, 06:45:34 PM
*puts right hand on the tsl forum user agreement form and the official tsl guide* i do solemnly swear that the translation of the attempted pig latin typed by me, Pacman928 of the tsl forums, is accurate.

happy? ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on January 28, 2007, 03:39:31 PM
*puts right hand on the tsl forum user agreement form and the official tsl guide* i do solemnly swear that the translation of the attempted pig latin typed by me, Pacman928 of the tsl forums, is accurate.

happy? ;P
The Court validifies (is that a word?) Mr. Pacman's translation is just and correct. However, why the negative attitude towards your bear-stance?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on January 28, 2007, 04:38:06 PM
Validates. ;)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on January 28, 2007, 11:19:09 PM
bear stance? ???
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on January 29, 2007, 03:44:10 PM
Validates. ;)
The Court wishes to extend its gratitude to Miss Rosella for point out the right word-choice. 8)

bear stance? ???
Figuratively used. Meaning: your position towards bears. The President of the Court couldn't be bothered to type those four words at the time. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on January 31, 2007, 03:56:14 PM
Oh, wow. I didn't know the word amscray was pig latin. I actually learned something today! ::)
You should browse wikipedia some more. There's actually quite good information to be found there. 8)

* leaves the courtroom *
My secret weapon works. :D
It makes of everyone a person that speaks pig latin. :P
The Court wishes to inform Mr. Gilgamesh his "secret weapon" doesn't work at all. Nobody of the Court spoke any pig Latin during your testing stage. Henceforth, it's useless and the people who did speak pig Latin did so of their own free will.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 05, 2007, 03:29:57 PM
The Court kindly asks the persons speaking pig Latin to do so elsewhere (in another thread). If they will not do so voluntarily, they will be driven out by force. The Court thanks everyone for their cooperation in ensuring these drastic measures will not be needed. :scholar:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on February 05, 2007, 04:00:34 PM
Quod reactio tua Latina Romanorum (non Latinam Porcorum) sit?

(What would be your reaction to Latin (not Latin of Pigs)? ) :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 05, 2007, 05:27:18 PM
its all greek to me :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 07, 2007, 03:52:13 PM
(What would be your reaction to Latin (not Latin of Pigs)? ) :P
Since the President of this court only attended Latin classes for about 4 months, in high school, which was a long time ago, the Court's objection extends to that language too.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 07, 2007, 09:17:41 PM
me permite hablar en espanol?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on February 08, 2007, 12:52:05 PM
Drfte ich Deutsch sprechen? :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Petra Rocks on February 08, 2007, 01:00:00 PM
La. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on February 08, 2007, 01:09:28 PM
(What would be your reaction to Latin (not Latin of Pigs)? ) :P
Since the President of this court only attended Latin classes for about 4 months, in high school, which was a long time ago, the Court's objection extends to that language too.

Is that to be interpreted as a statement that no language that the President of this court does not speak is objectionable?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on February 08, 2007, 02:48:08 PM
Technically speaking, an [trusted] interpreteur need be present in the courtroom, of course, but I see little reason why other languages can't be spoken if that is fulfilled. :)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 08, 2007, 03:41:31 PM
Technically speaking, an [trusted] interpreteur need be present in the courtroom, of course, but I see little reason why other languages can't be spoken if that is fulfilled. :)
Technically speaking, that is correct, but wherever is this Court going to find trusted interpreters inhere?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on February 09, 2007, 08:38:56 AM
Drfte ich Deutsch sprechen? :D
Speak it even if he says no... :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on February 09, 2007, 11:06:05 AM
Drfte ich Deutsch sprechen? :D
Speak it even if he says no... :P
XD Er sagte aber schliesslich auch nicht nein. Er sagte nur, er wrde einen bersetzer brauchen mssen und dass er nicht wsste wo man einen finden knnte. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on February 09, 2007, 10:16:37 PM
Well if he finds one, I hope you'll enjoy yourself. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 10, 2007, 01:12:26 PM
can we have another case?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on February 10, 2007, 03:11:07 PM
Ich bin auch der Meinung es sollte einen neuen Fall geben.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 11, 2007, 03:00:52 PM
XD Er sagte aber schliesslich auch nicht nein. Er sagte nur, er wrde einen bersetzer brauchen mssen und dass er nicht wsste wo man einen finden knnte. :P
The only word I couldn't translate, is 'schliesslich'. :scholar: And I said I wouldn't know how to find one on the TSL forums. Big difference. :pokerface:

can we have another case?
The Court asks if Mr. Pacman has a case he would like to bring forward, at which time the Court shall decide whether it's appropriate of it's worthy of its time. No, seriously, whether its suitable as Court material.

Ich bin auch der Meinung es sollte einen neuen Fall geben.
I deduced 'Fall' would be 'Case' then. :pleased:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on February 11, 2007, 03:25:47 PM
XD Er sagte aber schliesslich auch nicht nein. Er sagte nur, er wrde einen bersetzer brauchen mssen und dass er nicht wsste wo man einen finden knnte. :P
The only word I couldn't translate, is 'schliesslich'. :scholar: And I said I wouldn't know how to find one on the TSL forums. Big difference. :pokerface:
I meant it in the sense of "after all". :) Ausserdem gibt es welche hier die Deutsch sprechen. :P

Ich bin auch der Meinung es sollte einen neuen Fall geben.
I deduced 'Fall' would be 'Case' then. :pleased:
[/quote]
Indeed. :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2007, 03:35:31 PM
puts his legs on the courtbench and gets some sleep. :zzz:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 12, 2007, 08:23:08 PM
i accuse myself of impersonating a forumer!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on February 12, 2007, 08:35:38 PM
If this turns out to be a case, I definitely want to watch.
*sits down in back*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 13, 2007, 10:04:28 PM
your honor, i have stolen my password and have been posting under the influece of myself,
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 14, 2007, 04:57:58 AM
* Gets on the judge's chair and wears the judge wig *
This looks cool.
Wait!
Pacman I the lawyer judge of this court will sentence you to a find yourself course.
I can see you haven't found yourself yet. ::)

* quickly changes back before CopyCat arrives *
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 14, 2007, 01:18:37 PM
i didnt steal your password!!  you gave it to me!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on February 15, 2007, 07:34:08 AM
Anyone notice that he has MPD like me I used to? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 15, 2007, 02:03:15 PM
I hereby order that everyone has MPD.
Whit two or more work sure goes faster. :raf:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 15, 2007, 03:35:44 PM
i accuse myself of impersonating a forumer!!

your honor, i have stolen my password and have been posting under the influece of myself,
Case REFUSED.

* Gets on the judge's chair and wears the judge wig *
This looks cool.
Wait!
Pacman I the lawyer judge of this court will sentence you to a find yourself course.
I can see you haven't found yourself yet. ::)

* quickly changes back before CopyCat arrives *
:pokerface: /me fines Gilgamesh for contempt of Court

Anyone notice that he has MPD like me I used to? :P
He does/you did? I actually can't remember that. *tries to jog brain* *fails*

I hereby order that everyone has MPD.
The Court asks that you pay no attention to what this person is saying and that this person is in no position to order anything.
I have MPO, which is better. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on February 15, 2007, 07:52:17 PM
Anyone notice that he has MPD like me I used to? :P
He does/you did? I actually can't remember that. *tries to jog brain* *fails*
It looked like I was double posting most of the time because of my other personalities. There was racx, satan and Jason. ;D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 16, 2007, 03:43:20 AM
:pokerface: /me fines Gilgamesh for contempt of Court
I haven't done anything wrong ::)
Well there was that one time I...
And another time I did...
And not to forget...

But you must remove that fine or I'll..., I'll..., I'll seu the court for being a court. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 16, 2007, 10:24:30 PM
just consolodate :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 18, 2007, 03:26:59 PM
It looked like I was double posting most of the time because of my other personalities. There was racx, satan and Jason. ;D
Ah yes, I seem to remember Satan vs Jason vs Racx now. :pleased:

I haven't done anything wrong ::)
But you must remove that fine or I'll..., I'll..., I'll seu the court for being a court. :P
The Court wishes to inform Gilgamesh that impersonating a member of the Court is a serious offence and will be fined. Such is the law. :pokerface:

just consolodate :P
Consolidate what? ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 18, 2007, 09:07:34 PM
jason should consolodate his mpd
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 19, 2007, 03:38:50 PM
jason should consolodate his mpd
The Court has a confirmed report from the Manager of the TSL Asylum mr. racx aka Jason has not had any symptoms of his former illness.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on February 21, 2007, 09:52:12 AM
OBJECTION!

We must all break for PBJs now. :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 21, 2007, 03:35:04 PM
OBJECTION!

We must all break for PBJs now. :D
Objection on hold until the Court knows what 'PBJ' means.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on February 21, 2007, 03:37:56 PM
Your honor, I'm fairly sure that OB meant peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on February 21, 2007, 04:59:40 PM
Tessspoon is right, your honor. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 21, 2007, 09:50:41 PM
*makes a pbj* *cuts it into very small pieces* *hands out pieces*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on February 21, 2007, 09:53:56 PM
*takes one*
Excellent! Thank you.
*takes sandwich to back of the room and sits down, waiting for the court to resume.*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 22, 2007, 03:46:58 PM
Your honor, I'm fairly sure that OB meant peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. ;P
Ah, but to break for a recess one doesn't have to object.
/me rejects Objection
/me suspends preliminary proceedings
I don't particularly like peanut butter. :X So I'll settle for just the jelly, if that's possible.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Oldbushie on February 22, 2007, 05:50:01 PM
One double jelly sandwich, coming up! :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 23, 2007, 09:23:12 PM
what kind of jelly?  bread?  crust or no?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on February 24, 2007, 06:12:07 AM
I think it's high time for an "order in the Court" joke. I'll have a PB Honey, chunky peanut butter. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 24, 2007, 09:43:12 PM
1 pbh, coming up!!  * goes into kitchen* choppity choppity chop!! *returns*  here you go.  im not that good of a cook though.  i just make cooking noises with my mouth
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 25, 2007, 03:38:47 PM
what kind of jelly?  bread?  crust or no?
What flavours of jelly do you have? What kinds of bread are on offer? I don't mind about crusts.

I think it's high time for an "order in the Court" joke.
But the Court's in recess!? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on February 25, 2007, 06:35:53 PM
May I have a second PBJ please? With smooth peanut butter, grape jelly, wheat bread, and no crusts?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 25, 2007, 08:59:28 PM
choppity choppity chop!!

*gives tess a smooth pb, grape j, wheat bread sandwitch with no crusts*

we have grape, strawberry, banana, mango, and kiwi jellies.  we have white, wheat, extra fiber, cheesy, rasin, bananam and banana nut breads.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: restamper on February 25, 2007, 09:02:53 PM
i want one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i would like one with smooth peanut butter, grape and kiwi jelly, on one slice extra fiber bread and one slice banana nut bread please!

thanks!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on February 25, 2007, 09:03:44 PM
Yummy! Thanks.

*eats sandwich*
*goes into hallway and gets water from the water fountain*
Water is so delicious. :)

*enters courtroom again*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 26, 2007, 03:17:09 AM
* opens his own lunchbagg *
look at this a union and a garlic sandwich.
* eats * :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 26, 2007, 09:14:17 PM
*makes res a smooth pb, grape and kiwi j with one slice banana nut bread and one slice extra fiber bread*  *gives res the sandwich*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on February 27, 2007, 02:29:09 PM
I want a smooth peanut butter sandwich on white bread with no crusts! :D

Actually...that sounds really good right now.. XP
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 27, 2007, 06:37:07 PM
choppity choppity chop!!

*gives kelsey a smooth pb decrustified sandwich on white bread*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 28, 2007, 03:32:12 AM
Don't we need something to drink?

Anyone some fresh juice?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on February 28, 2007, 04:11:21 PM
we have grape, strawberry, banana, mango, and kiwi jellies.  we have white, wheat, extra fiber, cheesy, rasin, bananam and banana nut breads.
Strawberry juice wheat bread please, thank you!

Don't we need something to drink?

Anyone some fresh juice?
Fresh orange juice please. :P

Court extends recess due to its President not feeling too well
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on February 28, 2007, 04:27:34 PM
Do you have fruit punch? If so, one glass of that please.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 28, 2007, 04:50:42 PM
* squishes oranges into juice and puts it in a glass *
One orange surprise.

* puts one orange, one apple and many other fruit into a punchbag and starts punching the punchbag *
A fruit punch. :P
* puts a straw in the glass *
Must have one. ;)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on February 28, 2007, 05:09:54 PM
*takes fruit punch*
Ooh! A curly straw!


*makes a bunch of straws like  this  (http://thorndon.co.nz/thorndon/character-straw.jpg) but with suffer smileys.*
Suffer straws!

*uses curly straw and suffer straw to drink fruit punch*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on February 28, 2007, 09:47:47 PM
cc, by strawberry juice i think you mean strawberry jelly. ;P

choppity choppity chop!!  *gives cc a smooth pb, strawberry j sandwich on wheat bread*

*squeezes an orange* *lets juice drip into a cup and hands the cup to cc*

 :o howd you get the straws to laugh?!?!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on March 01, 2007, 05:58:31 AM
:o howd you get the straws to laugh?!?!
That be my secret invention. :suffer:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on March 01, 2007, 06:33:30 PM
I want a class of milk with a curly Suffer straw! XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on March 01, 2007, 06:37:38 PM
ooh! excellent idea.

*makes a million curly suffer straws*
*gives kelsey one*

you'll have to ask pacman about a class of milk, whatever that is. XD

now i've got a million - 1 curly suffer straws! :suffer:

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on March 01, 2007, 06:38:53 PM
Actually, I think the GLASS of milk is less important than the curly Suffer straw... XP
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 01, 2007, 08:41:27 PM
what kind of milk?  cow milk?  goat milk?  llama milk?  etc..
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Rosella on March 02, 2007, 09:09:31 PM
Normal cow milk. :P 2% please. XP
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on March 04, 2007, 03:46:17 PM
cc, by strawberry juice i think you mean strawberry jelly. ;P
Although strawberry juice is nice too, I think you're right. Thanks! :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 04, 2007, 09:20:05 PM
*gets kelsey a glass of 2% cow milk*

*gets cc some strawberry juice* :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on March 05, 2007, 02:55:36 AM
*gets kelsey a glass of 2% cow milk*
Pacman that's not a cow, thats a bull. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on March 05, 2007, 03:54:22 PM
*gets cc some strawberry juice* :P
Thankies! ;)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on March 05, 2007, 05:31:09 PM
*gets cc some strawberry juice* :P
Thankies! ;)
Would you like a curly suffer straw to go with that? :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 06, 2007, 08:43:07 PM
werent the straws straight?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on March 06, 2007, 08:46:09 PM
the first ones were. Then Rosella gave me the idea to make curly suffer straws. Want one?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on March 07, 2007, 03:22:38 PM
Would you like a curly suffer straw to go with that? :D
Aye.... would! :P
Got any plans for milkshakes? ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on March 08, 2007, 07:50:30 AM
*gives CC a curly suffer straw*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 08, 2007, 12:10:22 PM
we now offer milkshakes!!  or, i could just shake some milk.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on March 09, 2007, 05:08:26 PM
we now offer milkshakes!!  or, i could just shake some milk.
I believe that is the definition of a milkshake: shaken milk. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 09, 2007, 09:16:25 PM
milkshakes have ice cream :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on March 09, 2007, 11:30:00 PM
Not necessarily.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 10, 2007, 09:55:27 PM
milkshakes with or without ice cream :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Jafar on March 11, 2007, 12:03:32 PM
Good milkshakes have ice cream. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on March 11, 2007, 04:28:50 PM
milkshakes have ice cream :P
Quote
milkshake - frothy drink of milk and flavoring and sometimes fruit or ice cream
The important word has been highlighted. 8)

Good milkshakes have ice cream. :P
Nah, removes/covers the flavour of the milkshake itself. :scholar:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 11, 2007, 08:45:17 PM
would you like one?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on March 11, 2007, 08:49:13 PM
I would like one! A chocolate one with ice cream.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 11, 2007, 08:54:10 PM
what kind of ice cream?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on March 11, 2007, 09:00:35 PM
Hmm, more chocolate! :D

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on March 12, 2007, 05:11:48 AM
Is chocolat allowed here?  :o
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on March 12, 2007, 08:59:04 AM
Of course it is!  This isn't the Asylum. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on March 13, 2007, 03:27:53 AM
So is this thread under new management? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on March 13, 2007, 04:31:12 PM
So is this thread under new management? :P
Does that mean I'm the judge!! !!!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on March 13, 2007, 04:54:16 PM
Of course it is!  This isn't the Asylum. :P
Righto. However, this Court is apparently turning into a food&beverage-stand. Actually, I'm wondering why no mod has felt the need to move it to a separate thread by now (to any mod, forget I said that).

So is this thread under new management? :P
Management? There's no management in this Court! Unless you count the Court as being the management, of which I am the president. The only connection between the Court and the Asylum is the reports the Court gets from the Asylum. Whenever the Court is speaking, it used bold.

Does that mean I'm the judge!! !!!
Juror, maybe, but judge, I don't think so. :pokerface:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on March 13, 2007, 06:17:56 PM
However, this Court is apparently turning into a food&beverage-stand.
I guess someone took "order in the court" to mean "order in the food court"? XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on March 14, 2007, 01:29:53 AM
Is it possible to Sue the court for not keeping order in the court? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on March 14, 2007, 03:37:43 AM
Righto. However, this Court is apparently turning into a food&beverage-stand. Actually, I'm wondering why no mod has felt the need to move it to a separate thread by now (to any mod, forget I said that).
I thought about doing it but you were still acting like a judge. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on March 14, 2007, 04:43:47 PM
Is it possible to Sue the court for not keeping order in the court? :P
Actually, the food&beverage stand is no longer in the Court Room, but has been relocated elsewhere in the Court building. And no, you can't sue the Court for that. You can always file a complaint with the police and they will have to intervene if necessary.

I thought about doing it but you were still acting like a judge. :P
How was I still acting like a judge when I was ordering a strawberry jelly sandwich and orange juice? ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on March 14, 2007, 04:52:08 PM
* files compliants saying this court is becoming too much a fast food servise and wastes it's time to put evil TSL-ers behind bars or into treatment *
Hope this will work. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on March 14, 2007, 05:04:46 PM

I thought about doing it but you were still acting like a judge. :P
How was I still acting like a judge when I was ordering a strawberry jelly sandwich and orange juice? ::)

Well, there was this post:

we have grape, strawberry, banana, mango, and kiwi jellies.  we have white, wheat, extra fiber, cheesy, rasin, bananam and banana nut breads.
Strawberry juice wheat bread please, thank you!

Don't we need something to drink?

Anyone some fresh juice?
Fresh orange juice please. :P

Court extends recess due to its President not feeling too well

* files compliants saying this court is becoming too much a fast food servise and wastes it's time to put evil TSL-ers behind bars or into treatment *
Hope this will work. :P
Atleast its (mostly) healthy fast food.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 14, 2007, 09:31:05 PM
*finally gets tess her chocolate milkshake*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on March 17, 2007, 09:55:45 AM
Well, there was this post:

Don't we need something to drink?

Anyone some fresh juice?
Fresh orange juice please. :P

Court extends recess due to its President not feeling too well
Thanks for finding that Tess. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on March 18, 2007, 04:51:44 PM
Well, there was this post:

Court extends recess due to its President not feeling too well
The Court remembers said statement, however, extending the recess did not imply turning this thread further into the catering direction. Anyway, Court ends recess and is back in business. Its President's sickness-ordeal has finally ended. :pleased:

* files compliants saying this court is becoming too much a fast food servise and wastes it's time to put evil TSL-ers behind bars or into treatment *
Hope this will work. :P
The Court would like Mr. Gilgamesh to specify the names of these 'evil TSL-ers' as it sees no persons of said group with said intentions. :pokerface:
The Court would like to extend its thanks to the caterers for filling up the gap during the President's sickness but asks that they leave now. If they do not, I will have them escorted out of the Court building. :bob:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 18, 2007, 08:30:08 PM
well, if the court is back in session, whats the case?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on March 20, 2007, 02:49:54 AM
the case of the evil salesperson who charges too much?
Because of the monopoly position of the salesperson he charges too much. :P
I won't say your name Pacman. :raf:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on March 20, 2007, 08:13:58 PM
hey, just because i play monopoly, doesnt mean i actuall have one :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on March 22, 2007, 04:29:14 PM
well, if the court is back in session, whats the case?
The Court does not necessarily be treating a case, it can also be evaluating whether or not a case of worthy of being brought into Cout.

the case of the evil salesperson who charges too much?
Because of the monopoly position of the salesperson he charges too much. :P
While it is true there was only one salesperson in the Court building, there were many more of them outside of it. If you think you were charged unjustly, take a look at the prices you have to pay to them. And besides, there is a a free market in this forum. Also, when you ordered an item at his stand, you entered a binding contract. This Court thinks people ought to think more before they enter a contract.

hey, just because i play monopoly, doesnt mean i actuall have one :P
It's been a long time since I last played Monopoly. XB
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on April 24, 2007, 09:20:08 PM
*picks up month and a half old chocolate milkshake*
*looks at it*
I don't think I want this anymore.
*throws out milkshake* :P

*sits back down in back of courtroom to await the next case*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on April 24, 2007, 09:24:20 PM
Wouldn't such a milkshake be more of a chocolate milk? *feels a case over drink nomenclature rapidly approaching* :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on April 26, 2007, 06:39:01 PM
*throws out milkshake* :P
Case opened: State vs Tessspoon
*fines Tess since  she did not throw the milkshake into a bin but just on the floor* Case closed. :pokerface:

Wouldn't such a milkshake be more of a chocolate milk? *feels a case over drink nomenclature rapidly approaching* :P
The Court thinks it will not treat a case on drink nomenclature 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on April 26, 2007, 07:17:44 PM
*throws out milkshake* :P
Case opened: State vs Tessspoon
*fines Tess since  she did not throw the milkshake into a bin but just on the floor* Case closed. :pokerface:
I did throw it in the bin! Someone else must have taken it out again and thrown it on the floor to frame me!
*refuses to pay fine*
 :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on April 26, 2007, 09:23:52 PM
now we have a case :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on April 27, 2007, 08:15:00 AM
I bet it was Reffus. :yes:

*glares at him* :jealous:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on April 27, 2007, 09:55:21 AM
 :suffer: ???
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on April 27, 2007, 02:08:59 PM
*goes to his policelab to find fingerprints on the milkshakecup* :bob:

This could take some time :P
*goes to his desk and falls asleep for a while* :zzz:
*wakes up 7 hours later*
It's ready! :D

And the result is:
Only tessspoon's fingerprints are on it XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on April 27, 2007, 11:09:54 PM
*questions the accuracy of said test*
Pacman handed the milkshake cup so his fingerprints should be on it too! :pokerface:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on April 29, 2007, 10:00:17 AM
*questions the accuracy of said test*
Pacman handed the milkshake cup so his fingerprints should be on it too! :pokerface:
well taken.
Now for the technical analysis of your question. :P
Fingerprints dissappair after some time.
It was 1 month since Pacman touched it so I couldn't find his prints on it.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on April 29, 2007, 04:37:23 PM
*questions the accuracy of said test*
Pacman handed the milkshake cup so his fingerprints should be on it too! :pokerface:
The Court also questions the accuracy of that test since Mr. Gilgamesh's lab does not have any Court credentials.

Now for the technical analysis of your question. :P
Fingerprints dissappair after some time.
It was 1 month since Pacman touched it so I couldn't find his prints on it.
This technical analysis proves even the operator of said lab does not have the proper background to operate such machinery and interpret its results. Fingerprints do not deteriorate that fast. They can get smudged by other (finger)prints, but since the cup was confiscated shortly after it had been thrown on the ground the chance of that is practically non-existent. A more plausible explanation would be mr. Pacman was wearing gloves when he was handing out the milkshake, but I see no reason why he would be doing that, so the Court is seriously doubting the technical capabilities of your fingerprinting equipment. 8)

I bet it was Reffus. :yes:
If you have a written signed testimony of this person declaring he has been doing it, and makes this confession out of free will (which means the Court will have to able to talk to this person without interference too, to determine this), this can be settled fairly quickly.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on April 29, 2007, 07:45:09 PM
(http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w231/tessspoon/reffus001.jpg)
I, Reffus the Giant Suffer, hereby declare that I was the one to take the milkshake cup out of the trashcan in which Tessy first placed it using my telepathic powers. The purpose of this action was to satisfy my curiosity as to what a milkshake left out for a month and a half would be like. My intentions at that point were to replace the milkshake cup in the bin. However, due to recent traumatizing events involving my kidnapping, my telepathic powers have somewhat deteriorated and I was unable to continue the effort of holding the said milkshake cup up; nor was I able to pick it up again so as to replace it in the trashcan. I was then distracted and the event was put out of my mind until the recent accusations against Tessy began.

This testimony and explanations were given by my own free will.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Shades2585 on April 29, 2007, 07:49:30 PM
LOL  XD go Tessy er I mean Reffus. :thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on April 30, 2007, 05:38:05 PM
I, Reffus the Giant Suffer, hereby declare that I was the one to take the milkshake cup out of the trashcan in which Tessy first placed it using my telepathic powers. The purpose of this action was to satisfy my curiosity as to what a milkshake left out for a month and a half would be like. My intentions at that point were to replace the milkshake cup in the bin. However, due to recent traumatizing events involving my kidnapping, my telepathic powers have somewhat deteriorated and I was unable to continue the effort of holding the said milkshake cup up; nor was I able to pick it up again so as to replace it in the trashcan. I was then distracted and the event was put out of my mind until the recent accusations against Tessy began.

This testimony and explanations were given by my own free will.
This testimony brings forth questions I would like to discuss with Mr. Reffus 'behind closed doors', meaning the accused cannot be present, nor could any prosecutor, if there were one. Can you tell him to contact me via PM so we can set this up?

LOL  XD go Tessy er I mean Reffus. :thumbsup:
Mr. Shades, are you perchance implying Ms. Tessy fabricated this testimony and it was not made by Mr. Reffus at all? :o
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Shades2585 on April 30, 2007, 09:01:22 PM
LOL  XD go Tessy er I mean Reffus. :thumbsup:
Mr. Shades, are you perchance implying Ms. Tessy fabricated this testimony and it was not made by Mr. Reffus at all? :o
I imply no such thing. I am only happy to see the truth prove Tessy innocence and Reffus courage in facing it.


<But I do applaud Tessy that was to cool idea.>
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 01, 2007, 05:48:11 PM
I imply no such thing. I am only happy to see the truth prove Tessy innocence and Reffus courage in facing it.
The Court would like to say that Ms. Tess's innocence and/or Mr. Reffus' guilt has not (yet) been proven beyond a doubt.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on May 02, 2007, 06:24:44 PM
*sits around in the court room waiting for Reffus and the Judge to finish their secret meeting*
I wonder what they're saying? I hope its going well. (For me, anyway ::)).
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 08, 2007, 03:45:21 PM
/me puts notice on door: Do not enter, questioning in progress.
PS: Tess, the meeting itself is not secret, what's said in in it is. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on May 08, 2007, 05:16:41 PM
PS: Tess, the meeting itself is not secret, what's said in in it is. 8)
Yeah, that's what I meant. :P Non-secret meeting with secret conversations.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 11, 2007, 08:27:54 PM
/me comes out of his office with a message:
Mr. Reffus has claimed Ms. Rebecca has committed forgery, Ms. Rebecca on the other hand claims innocent. Henceforth, I would like both parties to come before me, asap in order to settle this dispute. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on May 11, 2007, 09:18:10 PM
*whispers to Reffus*
What did you do?

*hurries forward*
I'm here, you Honor.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: restamper on May 11, 2007, 09:33:16 PM
*walks in*

Im here as well.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 13, 2007, 04:23:21 PM
To the question:
Third question: who really signed that message?

Reffus answered:
3. ...

   me!

   ...

   :sweating:

   Oh all right!! It was Rebecca! She signed it! :S

When the court confronted Ms. Rebecca with this accusation, like this:
You have been charged with forgery by Reffus, how do you plead?
She answered:
What?! That is crazy talk! I plead not guilty I never did such a thing!
The Court wishes both parties to settle this matter.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on May 13, 2007, 05:00:05 PM
Well, she did!  :pokerface:

There's no way Reffus could have signed that and taken the picture of it as we do not have the camera with us here at school. Rather, is it at home with Rebecca.

Wait, this is going against my own original case isn't it. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: restamper on May 14, 2007, 03:28:10 PM
*clears throat*

As you can see, Tessy is obviously delusional. She was arguing against her own case! Therefore she cannot be a viable witness to the case between her and I.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on May 14, 2007, 04:06:05 PM
Case and point: I is a pronoun of the wrong case. XD *couldn't resist*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 14, 2007, 04:24:03 PM
Well, she did!  :pokerface:

There's no way Reffus could have signed that and taken the picture of it as we do not have the camera with us here at school. Rather, is it at home with Rebecca.

Wait, this is going against my own original case isn't it. :P
It is? *flips through pages* Oh yeah, it is, thanks for reminding me. :pleased:

As you can see, Tessy is obviously delusional. She was arguing against her own case! Therefore she cannot be a viable witness to the case between her and I.
Witness?  As far as I'm concerned, she's still suspect #1. The guilt of Mr. Reffus has still not been settled, and by reading her latest reply, she's even incriminating herself again. I won't go so far as to call her delusional. Everyone's entitled to have an off-day now and then and this was obviously one of those for her.
However, as Mr. Reffus is always in the vicinity of Ms. Tess and the camera with which the picture was taken has been in your possession all along, supposing Mr. Reffus and Ms. Tess have not been in contact with you and/or the camera recently, this court is seriously considering  striking the evidence brought forward by Ms. Tess. :pokerface:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: restamper on May 14, 2007, 06:19:38 PM
Oh all right! I confess! Yes I signed Reffus on the paper but only because Tessy begged me to! How was I supposed to let her down when she was on the brink of tears! If this court is going to punish me for proving the innocence of my own flesh and blood then I have lost my faith in the justice system.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 16, 2007, 05:22:59 PM
Oh all right! I confess! Yes I signed Reffus on the paper but only because Tessy begged me to! How was I supposed to let her down when she was on the brink of tears! If this court is going to punish me for proving the innocence of my own flesh and blood then I have lost my faith in the justice system.
This Court acknowledges emotional blackmail and will not prosecute you for forgery. However, this Court is now striking the document provided by Ms. Tess as proof of her innocence from the proceedings. As of now Ms. Tess is our one and only suspect and as her prints were found on the paper by our own fingerprint scanning system, which is vastly superior to Gilgamesh's, we have proof too.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on May 16, 2007, 05:49:27 PM
Ack. I have no more means of defense. :sweating:

I'm still sticking to my story though. ;P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on May 17, 2007, 01:55:47 AM
Obviously your scanner isn't very good if it didn't pick up my finger prints! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 17, 2007, 05:37:45 AM
But monarchs are above the law, thus Tess can be guilty of no offence! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 17, 2007, 03:44:15 PM
Ack. I have no more means of defense. :sweating:

I'm still sticking to my story though. ;P
That's just it, a 'story'. This Court does not rule on 'stories', but on 'facts'. Facts are: you threw the holding container of the beverage, your fingerprints are on it, and the holding container was found on the floor.

Obviously your scanner isn't very good if it didn't pick up my finger prints! :P
Unless by posting this comment Mr. Racx is claiming his guilt of this offence instead of Ms. Tess, there's nothing wrong with our scanner, there are several fingerprints on the holding container but none of those other fingerprints are backed up by other facts.

But monarchs are above the law, thus Tess can be guilty of no offence! :P
The Court would like to re-iterate to Ms. Deloria this Court is located in an International District, and as such does not need to take notice of these kind of things.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on May 18, 2007, 08:30:42 AM
Yes, but considering I did touch it, I'm technically a suspect. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on May 18, 2007, 10:09:00 AM
Yes, but considering I did touch it, I'm technically a suspect. :P
:o You7 didn't wore gloves? :o
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on May 18, 2007, 11:13:17 AM
The Court would like to re-iterate to Ms. Deloria this Court is located in an International District, and as such does not need to take notice of these kind of things.
I'll go for diplomatic immunity. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 18, 2007, 05:51:35 PM
Yes, but considering I did touch it, I'm technically a suspect. :P
You want to be a suspect? Fine by me. *adds Mr. Racx to the suspect list, in 2nd place behind Ms. Tess*

I'll go for diplomatic immunity. :P
In some ways, that is the same as Ms. Deloria was saying. Since there are no diplomats in the International District the Court is located in, you can't get diplomatic immunity.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on May 20, 2007, 07:56:15 AM
:o You7 didn't wore gloves? :o
Nope, didn't feel the need to...

Could this problem be solved if one of us just picked it up and put it in the bin? :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 20, 2007, 10:42:36 AM
*does that* ::)

Now I've touched it too. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 20, 2007, 03:48:11 PM
Could this problem be solved if one of us just picked it up and put it in the bin? :D
Two subsequent actions, clearly divided in time, even if it were done by the same person <> one action. If it had been put in the bin in the first place, this problem would be solved. People need to think before they act, and face the consequences if they did something without thinking properly. If we let this slip, that person might do just the same thing the next time.

*does that* ::)

Now I've touched it too. XD
There is nothing to be gained by taking evidence from the evidence desk and putting it elsewhere. Court personnel will just have to take it out again and back there. The fact your fingerprints are now on it is of no importance, all analyses has been done.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on May 20, 2007, 10:48:26 PM
Thinking before acting isn't one of my strong points your honour.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 21, 2007, 05:22:47 AM
*burns cup* :evil:

EDIT: After this case, I will be court marshalled by myself for having adopted the initials U.E. after my name.  :'(
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 21, 2007, 04:20:54 PM
Thinking before acting isn't one of my strong points your honour.
In that case, it's lucky it's not your trial at this point then.

*burns cup* :evil:
After the cup was taken and put into the bin, when the Court closed for the day, the cup was taken into protective custody and was replaced with an ordinary cup on the evidence table the next day, to see if anything happened next. I now see your intent was to burn official evidence, leading me to the conclusion you are in liaison with Ms. Tess and henceforth I add you to this case, to stand beside her. You are hereby charged with tampering with the evidence and contempt of Court. 8)

EDIT: After this case, I will be court marshalled by myself for having adopted the initials U.E. after my name.  :'(
This Court has no jurisdiction in the military, so no court marshalling.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 22, 2007, 09:48:59 AM
I'm a pyromaniac, what can I say? :angel: Not that I consciously burned the cup, of course. ::)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 22, 2007, 04:08:05 PM
I'm a pyromaniac, what can I say? :angel: Not that I consciously burned the cup, of course. ::)
I see, then why didn't you burn the other evidence items on the evidence table (which are also not original of course)? In any case, I'll relay this condition to the Manager of the TSL Asylum, as I'm sure it's a new one. At least it's not in the list I got from him when I asked for information right after I put you on trial.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 23, 2007, 05:14:07 AM
Well, I'm sure I was about to do so, ::) but then I was brought rather suddenly to my senses.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 23, 2007, 03:54:16 PM
In that case, I'll add to my memo to the Manager of the Asylum Manager there's still hope.
/me would like to make it known preliminary hearings are over and real proceedings have begun
This case is labeled: President of the Court (prosecutor) vs Mss Tess and Ms Deloria (defendants) 8)
/me has made his stance quite clear in the preliminary hearings and does not wish to repeat himself. Henceforth, he  does not wish to make a statement
The Court asks if the defendants want to make an opening statement
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on May 23, 2007, 06:09:38 PM
What happened to Racx as a suspect?

I continue to claim my innocence and will attempt to use information found in previous posts to prove so, and anything else I manage to think of. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Elessar on May 23, 2007, 07:14:49 PM
I would like to call racx_00 to the stand.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on May 23, 2007, 11:28:22 PM
What happened to Racx as a suspect?
I was found innocent? :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 24, 2007, 04:26:11 AM
I maintain the only reason I was implicated into this case was my terrible mental illness that causes me to burn random things. :no: It's purely coincidental that the cup I burned was made to look a valued piece of evidence.

::)

I would then also like to point out that I've decided to adopt this court as a realme of mine (through right of conquest ;D) and thus I should not be addressed as "Ms" but rather as "Milady".  ;D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on May 24, 2007, 04:35:11 AM
Why don't we hold a recess again and it it happens again we'll know who did it.
At least if we all watch eachother. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 24, 2007, 04:38:49 AM
But then this court would tragically be lacking a case as I doubt CC shall let me sue myself. :-\
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 24, 2007, 04:38:10 PM
What happened to Racx as a suspect?
Mr. Racx was cleared as a suspect due to a lack of corroborating evidence.

I continue to claim my innocence and will attempt to use information found in previous posts to prove so, and anything else I manage to think of. :P
The Court applauds this stance.

I would like to call racx_00 to the stand.
HOLD IT! This Court has not approved anyone calling for witnesses yet. Furthermore, this Court would like to know who you're supposed to represent, and if the party you're representing accepts you representing them.

I maintain the only reason I was implicated into this case was my terrible mental illness that causes me to burn random things. :no: It's purely coincidental that the cup I burned was made to look a valued piece of evidence.

::)

I would then also like to point out that I've decided to adopt this court as a realme of mine (through right of conquest ;D) and thus I should not be addressed as "Ms" but rather as "Milady".  ;D
The Court begs to differ. It finds it hard to believe the co-defendant did not notice the large sign 'evidence' hanging from the ceiling at the exact height the co-defendants' eyes would be when walking over to the evidence table.
This Court does not need to be adopted by anyone, as its jurisdiction over the whole of the TSL forum inhabitants has been implied by giving it its own thread. To remain impartial, henceforth this Court will be referring to you as 'co-defendant'.

Why don't we hold a recess again and it it happens again we'll know who did it.
At least if we all watch eachother. :P
/me considers this suggestion shortly but rejects it due to practical problems.
 After all, one person can't watch another all the time.

But then this court would tragically be lacking a case as I doubt CC shall let me sue myself. :-\
The Court would like to know why the co-defendant would sue herself.

Have the defendant and the co-defendant concluded their opening statements?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Elessar on May 25, 2007, 10:10:42 AM
I would like to call racx_00 to the stand.
HOLD IT! This Court has not approved anyone calling for witnesses yet. Furthermore, this Court would like to know who you're supposed to represent, and if the party you're representing accepts you representing them.
I beg you pardon, your Honour, I am representing the State.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on May 25, 2007, 12:56:53 PM
Have the defendant and the co-defendant concluded their opening statements?
I have, your Honor.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on May 25, 2007, 01:56:29 PM
Well, I'm told I need to be sued for adopting the letters U.E after my name despite having no legal right to do so. ::) But considering it's my crown, that technically means I must sue myself. ;P

And yes, my opening statement has been concluded, except that I would again like to stress, that I burned the cup unconsciously and probably would have burned many other things had I not been alerted that I'd just only received a new PM which brought me back to my senses.

Besides which, the true cup was not burnt, only a reproduction, thus am I not only guilty only of destroying fake evidence (and perhaps arson, though considering that it was not wilful, but rather a mental disorder and unconsciously, I'd opt for not)?

Yes, I agree, I can't argue. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 27, 2007, 07:45:29 PM
I beg you pardon, your Honour, I am representing the State.
Did you not read the label of this case? The State has no role here. You have to represent one of the party's in the label. Before you start representing anyone, you must first confer with that person upon which strategy you're going to follow, and see if the one your representing agrees. You can't go calling for witnesses blindly.

And yes, my opening statement has been concluded, except that I would again like to stress, that I burned the cup unconsciously and probably would have burned many other things had I not been alerted that I'd just only received a new PM which brought me back to my senses.

Besides which, the true cup was not burnt, only a reproduction, thus am I not only guilty only of destroying fake evidence (and perhaps arson, though considering that it was not wilful, but rather a mental disorder and unconsciously, I'd opt for not)?
If the Manager of the Asylum has found you are indeed suffering from that kind of mental illness, your sentence will most probably be incarceration in the Asylum, but since you're already there... It does not matter a reproductive cup was burnt. You were not aware it was a copy when you burnt it, thus it was the real thing to you.
Okay, the Court will now allow the party's to call for witnesses/ Iit wishes to stress though, that nobody (claiming to) represent(ing) must be brought forward by the party in question, and that party must state it has talked through its strategy with said 'representor' and to follow what he/she says.

EDIT:
had I not been alerted that I'd just only received a new PM which brought me back to my senses.
The Manager of the TSL Asylum has asked This Court to ask Ms Deloria she makes a written statement, addressed to him, in how this new PM brought her back to her senses. This statement will (hopefully) help him to prepare himself for his interview with Ms Deloria, in determining why she burnt the cup. With the Psychiatric nurse being absent, he will have to take the interview himself. This Court will not read this written statement, that information is privy to the Manager of the TSL Asylum and MS Deloria. When the Manager has made his conclusion, the Court will receive a notification of the outcome and take it into consideration.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on May 29, 2007, 04:10:59 PM
I would like to call Pacman to the stand.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on May 30, 2007, 04:06:03 PM
Mr. Pacman has been summoned. :pleased:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 05, 2007, 03:46:48 PM
Since Mr. Pacman is not responding to this Court's summoning we suspect he is on extended leave from this realm and will allow other witnesses to be called for, whilst we wait for Mr. Pacman's return. 8)
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on June 06, 2007, 06:14:32 PM
I have enlisted the help of a lawyer. She should be here soon to call the next witness.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 07, 2007, 04:02:40 PM
The Court would like to know the name of this lawyer. To ensure confidentiality, you may inform the name of this person via the President's PM-box. After all, we wouldn't want to see someone claiming to be your lawyer but being someone else when you were absent and damaging your case.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: restamper on June 18, 2007, 02:35:59 PM
I, Tessy's lawyer, would like to call my first witness which will be Gilgamesh.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on June 18, 2007, 04:18:19 PM
This Court acknowledges restamper as Tessy's lawyer
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on June 25, 2007, 11:30:10 PM
* goes to the witness stand *
Why did you call me as a witness rastamper?
I haven't stolen that candy :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: restamper on June 28, 2007, 12:16:15 PM
I shall kindly overlook the candy statement, though it does seem to be worth investigation.

My first question:

Were you, Gilgamesh,  present during the time the food court was open, in fact helping make juice?

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on June 28, 2007, 04:11:39 PM
Shouldn't I fist do the oath?
I will speak the thruth and nothing but the thruth?
* squishes oranges into juice and puts it in a glass *
One orange surprise.

* puts one orange, one apple and many other fruit into a punchbag and starts punching the punchbag *
A fruit punch. :P
* puts a straw in the glass *
Must have one. ;)
I did made some juice, but an evil salesperson has driven me out of business.
* points at pacman *
But like I said I haven't stolen that candybarr. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on July 02, 2007, 04:05:42 PM
I haven't stolen that candy :P

But like I said I haven't stolen that candybarr. :P

Why are you this preoccupied with a (supposed) stolen candy bar? This Court hasn't received any complaint regarding such a thing.

Shouldn't I fist do the oath?
I will speak the thruth and nothing but the thruth?
For the sake of continuity, let us assume the oath is automatically taken when the witness takes the stand, unless expressly stated otherwise by the witness. In such case, lawyers are forbidden to ask said witness questions until the Court has had its say.

I did made some juice, but an evil salesperson has driven me out of business.
* points at pacman *
There's nothing wrong with a little competition. That doesn't make your competitor an evil person.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on July 03, 2007, 01:16:41 AM
There's nothing wrong with a little competition. That doesn't make your competitor an evil person.
It does when the juice is on the courtrooms floor, walls or cieling.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: restamper on July 03, 2007, 12:41:38 PM
My next question,

Since you confirmed that you were making juice, were you then present during the time in which Tessy threw the cup into the trashcan? Did you see her?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on July 03, 2007, 04:01:18 PM
It does when the juice is on the courtrooms floor, walls or cieling.
Why were you putting your juice on the courtroom floor, walls or ceiling?  ::) :P

PS: Please don't let my remarks, not made by the President of the Court or any other member of it, hinder the witness in answering questions from the defense.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on July 04, 2007, 12:05:47 AM
Why were you putting your juice on the courtroom floor, walls or ceiling?  ::) :P
I didn't, but that could happen when someone drops the juice (by accident) or throws it.


As you can see I was discussing an important matter whit Pacman so I didn't saw her throwing the cup.
The only thing I heared was the bin being hit by something.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on July 05, 2007, 03:26:50 PM
As you can see I was discussing an important matter whit Pacman so I didn't saw her throwing the cup.
The only thing I heared was the bin being hit by something.
The Court cannot see anything in that quote.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: restamper on July 12, 2007, 08:42:22 PM
The defense has no more witnesses.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on July 16, 2007, 09:44:45 AM
The Court cannot see anything in that quote.
click on the quote to get to the date so you can see it yourself.  ;D

Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Pacman928 on July 23, 2007, 11:21:55 AM
well, i checked my pms and i saw cc had sent me one, calling me here.  i read a little of the case, so i guess i should take the oath and sit on the stand.

i solemnly swear that i am up to no good. (and to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me god)
*sits in the witness stand*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on July 25, 2007, 05:26:33 PM
XD It's been so long I've forgotten what we wanted to ask you... so, um, no further questions I suppose. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on July 30, 2007, 07:43:42 PM
Cross-examination:
Mr. Gilgamesh, do you remember who was present in the Court room, at the time you heard the bin being hit by something, apart from yourself & mr. Pacman?

This post has been made by the prosecutor.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on July 30, 2007, 09:06:26 PM
Delling and Racx  were there also there.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on August 05, 2007, 02:45:28 PM
The prosecution has no more questions for Mr. Gilgamesh.
Mr. Gilgamesh, you may step down.
The prosecution calls forth Mr. Delling and Mr. Racx.

Part of this post has been made by the prosecutor.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on October 17, 2007, 04:46:43 PM
*makes grandiose entrance by carrying dry ice in a bucket of water and flash light under his ghost-sheet disguise*

I am here. *takes the stand, still in disguise*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on October 17, 2007, 05:49:32 PM
I'm here! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on October 18, 2007, 06:38:11 PM
*makes grandiose entrance by carrying dry ice in a bucket of water and flash light under his ghost-sheet disguise*

I am here. *takes the stand, still in disguise*
The Court asks for the person claiming to be Mr. Delling to please remove his disguise in this Court Room, in order to ascertain this person's identity. Until your identity has been confirmed, thie Court will not let you take the stand.

I'm here! :P
Please take the stand and place your hand on this denominated book and say 'I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me [your preferred person of high importance you normally swear on].
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on October 18, 2007, 09:05:27 PM
*a ragged looking lawyer in an ancient brown, moth eaten suit arrives in the courtroom* I object to my client, Mr Delling, removing his disguise!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on October 18, 2007, 10:54:24 PM
If I were to remove my disguise... it might stop being a disguise... *cough* moat monsters *cough*... Therefore, I refuse to undisguise myself on the grounds that that might harm... myself.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on October 19, 2007, 03:39:47 AM
Please take the stand and place your hand on this denominated book and say 'I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me [your preferred person of high importance you normally swear on].
But maybe I don't swear to tell the truth?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on October 19, 2007, 07:39:48 PM
*a ragged looking lawyer in an ancient brown, moth eaten suit arrives in the courtroom* I object to my client, Mr Delling, removing his disguise!
On what grounds?

If I were to remove my disguise... it might stop being a disguise... *cough* moat monsters *cough*... Therefore, I refuse to undisguise myself on the grounds that that might harm... myself.
Hold it! Either (the suspected) Mr. Delling does not have a lawyer, and Mr. PK has no right to intervene. Or, Mr. Delling has a lawyer, in which case it is not Mr. Delling's task to explaining his lawyer's objection.  If it makes you feel any more comfortable, the Court will order the spectators (and press) to leave the courtroom, and make this a closed session.

But maybe I don't swear to tell the truth?
If you don't swear to tell the truth, how can this Court rely on what you are answering to the prosecutor's question(s)?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on October 19, 2007, 08:00:56 PM
If I were to remove my disguise... it might stop being a disguise... *cough* moat monsters *cough*... Therefore, I refuse to undisguise myself on the grounds that that might harm... myself.
Hold it! Either (the suspected) Mr. Delling does not have a lawyer, and Mr. PK has no right to intervene. Or, Mr. Delling has a lawyer, in which case it is not Mr. Delling's task to explaining his lawyer's objection.  If it makes you feel any more comfortable, the Court will order the spectators (and press) to leave the courtroom, and make this a closed session.

I think I can kill two birds with one stone here... I hereby recognize Mr. PK as my attorney. This relationship had not been formalized previously, thus the preceding confusion. I apologize.

PK may now field your questions.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on October 20, 2007, 01:58:19 AM
*glares at his client, for his memory loss* I refer to my clients response to the order to remove his disguise. And I ask that all spectators indeed, be banished from the courtroom.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on October 20, 2007, 02:51:43 AM
Surely not. :'( Please let me stay? *begs* *takes up any random role in the courtroom that needs filling* I can manage the pity party when someone has been proven guilty. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on October 20, 2007, 08:04:04 AM
*whispers to PK*

Deloria may stay as she is aware of all of the extenuating circumstances. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on October 20, 2007, 01:42:23 PM
We ask the court to allow Deloria to stay, as she may be called as a witness.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on October 20, 2007, 02:28:04 PM
If you don't swear to tell the truth, how can this Court rely on what you are answering to the prosecutor's question(s)?
I guess I won't be able to answer the prosecutor's questions... :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on October 20, 2007, 03:01:44 PM
We ask the court to allow Deloria to stay
Thank you ever so. :D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on October 21, 2007, 05:13:02 PM
I hereby recognize Mr. PK as my attorney. This relationship had not been formalized previously, thus the preceding confusion. I apologize.
The Court acknowledges mr. PK as attorney to this mr. Delling

*glares at his client, for his memory loss* I refer to my clients response to the order to remove his disguise. And I ask that all spectators indeed, be banished from the courtroom.

We ask the court to allow Deloria to stay, as she may be called as a witness.
Ms. Deloria is not a spectator, she is co-defendant IIRC. :scholar:
The Court asks for all spectators to leave the courtroom. If they will not do willingly, they will be escorted out.


I guess I won't be able to answer the prosecutor's questions... :P
Such contempt of court will not go by unnoticed... Bailiff, take this man into custody!

Now, Mr. (supposed) Delling, please remove your disguise, or I'll have you thrown in jail just like Mr. Racx to think it over. The Court would like to ask mr. PK whether, when he was appointed attorney to this Mr. Delling, if he knew he really was hired by the Mr. Delling that was called to the stand and not an imposter.
The Court would like to state that, even when in jail, Mr. Racx and the suspected Mr. Delling, can still be visited by their lawyers. Since Mr. Racx has no lawyer, the Court would like to ask if he would like to appoint one. If not, Court personnel will visit him at regular intervals, but not to his defence.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on October 21, 2007, 05:23:43 PM
Ms. Deloria is not a spectator, she is co-defendant IIRC.
She is? What for? For that matter, what am I on trial for again?

*looks at court history*

Oh, right. The milkshake. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on October 21, 2007, 06:27:21 PM
All right then... I refuse to be without my... spectral form ::) for long! *drops cloth, stands still briefly, and covers self with cloth again*

Is the court satisfied?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on October 21, 2007, 11:29:06 PM
Guess I don't need to help with this case then... :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on October 22, 2007, 04:34:14 PM
All right then... I refuse to be without my... spectral form ::) for long! *drops cloth, stands still briefly, and covers self with cloth again*

Is the court satisfied?
The Court has now established you are indeed the Mr. Delling it has summoned and would like you to take the oath. Bailiff, release this man from custody!

Guess I don't need to help with this case then... :P
The Court needs as much corroborating testimony as it can get. So don't think you can get out of that cell that fast/easy, young man...
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on October 22, 2007, 04:34:54 PM
My client, in private, showed himself to be the REAL Mr. Delling indeed. As my client has briefly shown his true self to the court, I believe this should satify what is asked.

Edit: I apologize to the court for the lateness of my reply, but I suffer from a slow response due to being way too awesome, at times.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on October 23, 2007, 04:27:19 PM
My client, in private, showed himself to be the REAL Mr. Delling indeed. As my client has briefly shown his true self to the court, I believe this should satify what is asked.

Edit: I apologize to the court for the lateness of my reply, but I suffer from a slow response due to being way too awesome, at times.
There are several steps a witness must follow before any party can ask him questions. First the Court has to ascertain the identity, that has been done. Now the witness has to take the oath, and afterwards the prosecutor can start his questioning.
It does not matter to the Court at which time replies are posted, since this Court is located in a time-free zone. In this space, time only goes forward when a new post is written.

Please note that the prosecutor in this case will be taking a leave from about October 28 to November 2. Since there's no prosecutor, Court proceedings will be suspended too. If questioning of a witness has not been concluded, that witness is allowed to go home, but will be accompanied by Court personnel to ensure they're on post again when the prosecutor returns. However, due to the mechanism explained above by the court, staying in the Court Room shouldn't really take that long.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on October 24, 2007, 12:21:25 AM
I'll happily take the stand and answer all questions...
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on October 24, 2007, 12:35:32 PM
I swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth regarding what I witnessed with respect to the milkshake. In regards to anything related to moat monsters, I know nothing. :sneaky:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on October 24, 2007, 04:33:16 PM
The Court asks the prosecutor to ask his question(s) to mr. Delling
/me asks Mr. Delling if he saw Ms. Tess throwing the milkshake cup and where it landed
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on October 24, 2007, 05:19:35 PM
As I recall, the cup was thrown by Ms. Tessy into the trash can. I did not see the cup's eventual landing on the floor which sparked this case's beginning.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on October 25, 2007, 04:10:38 PM
I'll happily take the stand and answer all questions...
Not without first taking the oath. :pokerface:

/me asks if Mr. Delling saw anyone near the trash can at the moment the cup landed in it
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on October 27, 2007, 12:03:11 PM
You'll have to repeat the oath, because I can't remember it. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on October 27, 2007, 07:19:38 PM
You'll have to repeat the oath, because I can't remember it. :P
Link! (http://www.postudios.com/blog/forum/index.php?topic=2673.msg228892#msg228892)

COURT IS NOW IN RECESS UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on October 28, 2007, 08:16:07 AM
Recess? I'm outta here!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 19, 2007, 04:27:12 PM
RECESS HAS ENDED. COURT IS BACK IN SESSION.

Will Mr. Racx please rejoin us in the stand?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on November 20, 2007, 02:14:23 AM
I'm here...
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 20, 2007, 04:31:49 PM
Please state the oath, as you were planning to do before recess.

/me asks why the Court is asking Mr. Racx to take the stand when his last question to Mr. Delling has not been answered yet.

Oops, The Court's bad. Mr. Racx, please step down from the stand and allow Mr. Delling to answer the prosecutor's last question. Mr. Delling, please take the stand. Mr. Racx, please don't go too far.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on November 20, 2007, 07:20:59 PM
*takes the stand*

I saw no one near the trash can at the time.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 21, 2007, 03:45:45 PM
Does the prosecutor have any more questions for this witness?
/me says: 'No, your honour.'
Does the defendant wish to cross-examine this witness?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on November 21, 2007, 04:15:13 PM
*runs back into court zipping up his fly*
Hope I'm not late, didn't miss anything important.....
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on November 21, 2007, 10:42:31 PM
Not at this time, your Honor.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 22, 2007, 04:45:19 PM
Mr. Delling, you may step down from the stand and thank you for your cooperation.
/me calls for Mr. Racx to take the witness stand
Will Mr. Racx please take the stand now and recite the oath (in his own words)?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on November 23, 2007, 03:43:36 AM
I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me Jason. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 25, 2007, 04:41:01 PM
Very well, The prosecutor can start asking his questions to this witness.
/me informs the Court and the witness he will ask this witness the same questions as he asked Mr. Delling. First question to Mr. Racx: 'Did you see Ms. Tess throwing the milkshake cup and where it landed?'
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on November 25, 2007, 05:25:44 PM
Yes I saw her throw it, and I saw it land in the bin.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 26, 2007, 04:35:58 PM
/me says: 'And did you see anyone near the bin at that time?'
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on November 26, 2007, 08:57:48 PM
Other than myself and Michael (pacman), I do not remember seeing anyone else. Although I do remember seeing a suspicious character wandering around.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on November 27, 2007, 03:24:16 PM
/me says: 'How could you tell it was a suspicious character?'
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on November 27, 2007, 10:02:58 PM
They were lurking, never spoke to anyone or made eye contact with anyone. They were keeping to themselves and hiding their face. It just didn't seem like someone we knew.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 02, 2007, 05:07:29 PM
/me asks: 'So there were multiple suspicious characters'?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on December 02, 2007, 06:11:03 PM
in hooded robes!... I mean... that was a completely different event entirely...
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on December 03, 2007, 05:04:20 AM
/me asks: 'So there were multiple suspicious characters'?

Two, although they didn't seem to interact with each other.

in hooded robes!... I mean... that was a completely different event entirely...
I never said hooded robes!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 03, 2007, 05:14:33 PM
Two, although they didn't seem to interact with each other.
/me says: 'Maybe there were communicating in code?'

I never said hooded robes!
No, you didn't :pokerface:
/me informs the Court, given this new piece of information, he would like to question Mr. Delling again, after he has finished questioning Mr. Racx of course
The Court asks Mr. PK, as legal counsel to Mr. Delling,  to approach the bench and asks him if he has any legal objections to his client taking the stand again
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on December 16, 2007, 12:39:32 AM
Sorry your honor. I'm a terrible lawyer and I'm afraid I fell asleep when I wasn't needed. I have no objections, as long as my client can remain in his disguise.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on December 17, 2007, 03:15:56 PM
Sorry your honor. I'm a terrible lawyer and I'm afraid I fell asleep when I wasn't needed. I have no objections, as long as my client can remain in his disguise.
No apology needed. As has been explained before, time does not 'flow' normally in the constraints of this thread.
As long as Mr. Delling appears in the same disguise as he was the last time, this Court now has the proper information to ascertain he is the same Mr. Delling who appeared beforehand.
However, Mr. Racx still has to answer (at least) one of the prosecutor's questions.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on April 13, 2008, 02:30:24 PM
*enters in disguise*
in hooded robes!... I mean... that was a completely different event entirely...

If the court would forgive my outburst... I was referring to a different event... (one in a movie... about the "greater good" that involved hooded robes...), it is unrelated to this case. :P

I would also like to state that I have a case to bring before the court against Racx and PK on charges of indecency for removing their pants while in the public forum!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Yonkey on April 13, 2008, 03:14:13 PM
I would also like to state that I have a case to bring before the court against Racx and PK on charges of indecency for removing their pants while in the public forum!
I support Delling's side as well in this lawsuit. XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on April 13, 2008, 03:25:15 PM
I would also like to state that I have a case to bring before the court against Racx and PK on charges of indecency for removing their pants while in the public forum!
I support Delling's side as well in this lawsuit. XD
And I!
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on April 13, 2008, 09:55:59 PM
*enters in disguise*
in hooded robes!... I mean... that was a completely different event entirely...

If the court would forgive my outburst... I was referring to a different event... (one in a movie... about the "greater good" that involved hooded robes...), it is unrelated to this case. :P

I would also like to state that I have a case to bring before the court against Racx and PK on charges of indecency for removing their pants while in the public forum!

I'm resigning effective immdiately as Delling's attorney.

And I regret NOTHING! *runs out of court, no pants on*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: racx_00 on April 13, 2008, 11:37:42 PM
Don't make me remove my underwear!

*parades around without pants*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on April 14, 2008, 12:31:24 PM
*enters in disguise*
in hooded robes!... I mean... that was a completely different event entirely...

If the court would forgive my outburst... I was referring to a different event... (one in a movie... about the "greater good" that involved hooded robes...), it is unrelated to this case. :P

I would also like to state that I have a case to bring before the court against Racx and PK on charges of indecency for removing their pants while in the public forum!

I'm resigning effective immdiately as Delling's attorney.

And I regret NOTHING! *runs out of court, no pants on*
*is thoroughly dead*
Considering the number of times I've died... and the fact that the initial death was to avoid litigation by litigious lizards (at least I think the moat monsters are lizards)... I don't think I have much to fear from the loss of your services. :pleased: :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on April 14, 2008, 01:33:11 PM
 :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Delling on April 15, 2008, 02:49:28 PM
Ok... PK, your response made me lol...
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on April 15, 2008, 02:52:29 PM
Ok... PK, your response made me lol...
As did yours XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Deloria on July 08, 2008, 07:26:09 AM
I would also like to state that I have a case to bring before the court against Racx and PK on charges of indecency for removing their pants while in the public forum!
I support Delling's side as well in this lawsuit. XD
And I!
As do I! :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on July 08, 2008, 12:19:12 PM
I'd like to ask this court to throw out this case...As clearly *gestures to his bottom half* I am wearing pants....
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on July 09, 2008, 03:02:10 AM
The judge is having a long long stay at a far far away resort.


I think we should vote for a new judge.

I'll immediately start my campaign :P

I promise you the court  will be cleaner.
drinks and food in the court aren't allowed unless it's in a glass.

Crimes will be punished even harder.
Instead of en 10 push-ups they have to do 25 push-ups. ;P

Bribe me and you'll get one day off.
(to jail)

A jester will be added to the court to make all sessions more funny. :cesar:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on July 09, 2008, 06:39:02 AM
If you become judge, will all previous unfinished cases be dropped?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on July 09, 2008, 02:19:51 PM
*confused* Who was actually the judge before?
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on July 09, 2008, 02:32:46 PM
CC
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on July 09, 2008, 03:06:20 PM
If you become judge, will all previous unfinished cases be dropped?
I need to clean up the desk so all the last cases will be ceased untill CC comes back to conquer the courtroom again. :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on July 09, 2008, 05:00:52 PM
I vote for you then. ;D
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on July 09, 2008, 05:02:57 PM
Can I be court jester?  XD
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on July 15, 2008, 02:03:49 AM
When I'm judge I'll make sure someone will be voted to court jester.
Just make sure you can be voted for.
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on October 11, 2008, 03:01:33 PM
*votes for PK as court jester*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: PirateKingChris on October 11, 2008, 03:50:24 PM
 XB Woo!
*votes for himself too*
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: icarus on October 12, 2008, 01:51:06 AM
votes for CC as court jester  :suffer:
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: copycat on October 17, 2008, 08:03:29 PM
If the court would forgive my outburst... I was referring to a different event... (one in a movie... about the "greater good" that involved hooded robes...), it is unrelated to this case. :P
The prosecutor had wished to ask Mr. Delling:
Your reaction indicated you seem to have knowledge of who the suspicious character were.
However, given this event:
*is thoroughly dead*
The Court thinks it has to dismiss this case due to the death of one of the Crown Witnesses. ::)
/me agrees with the Court's assessment.
Case dismissed! *bangs gavel*
*CC resigns as judge and speaker of the Court*
The Supreme Judge (being Mr. Yonkey, in case he has forgotten) will be in charge of appointing a new judge, and in decisions whether or not a court jester is needed and who it should be.

votes for CC as court jester  :suffer:
I am not running/applying to become court jester, if the Supreme Judge were to decide one is needed. :suffer:
PS: You are not allowed to use the :suffer: smiley, only Staff and Beta testers are. :pokerface:  :P
Title: Re: The Court Thread
Post by: tessspoon on October 17, 2008, 10:22:36 PM
Is that my case being dismissed?

If so...

 :D :D ;D ;D !!! !!! :futuristic: :futuristic: :pleased: :pleased: :angel: :angel:

I'ma not guilty! :D

XD XD This case took a year and a half to finish XD XD