King's Quest is sexy :o
lol, what kind of post is that, and here in here hahaha :P
Maybe he finally played KQ7, and discovered the lingerie in Malicia's drawer? ;D
Or he's commenting on our relentless picking on poor Edgar and Alex in the "Sketch of the Week" thread? :suffer:
Peace & Luv, Liz
LOL! Wtf? :suffer:
At least introduce yourself, Jeff! ;D
Hahaha yay another person who comes out with random comments ;D.
Welcome to the mob!!! :P
yeah all the weirdos from around here come from the SAY SQUAT SUPAH WEIRDZ TEAM :P lol!! wtf hahah :D
anyways, welcome to the forums jeff canadian boy :P
Jeff the Canadian???
How do you guys know him? ;)
He just joined the Web Team! 8)
Cool! 8)
Welcome to the team, Jeff! :D
yeah we got 2 new dorks on the bunch, will and jeff, if it werent for me it would be like WTF THE CANADIAN TEAM! :D lol, wtf stupid and pointless dont mind me :P
Thank you..
I am here to help out as much as possible. I am Canadian boy. I like peanuts. I like to call Say names. I wish I live din a bubble. I like water with a banana in it. Im just a normal person I guess ;)
Enough about me. How about you people? Entertain me :) I am bored. lol
oh btw Kings Quest is Sexy :)
Im Say, you know me already you stalk me over msn every single moment when you get bored, and dont call me names or I will hurt you :D
<3 !
and not every kq is sexy... KQ9 IS secsay :D
SECSAYYYYYYYY
Liar you stalk me on msn askin me for a naked pic of myself.. RUDE! You say that im gonan cheat on you with Cesar.. I cant live like this!
;)
lol
HAHAHA WTF STFU, I havent asked any porn stuff to you! lol, and yes you cheat on webteam with cesar... who knows with what department, HAH... you backstabber biatch! :P
wtf cheater cheater cheater!
PR AND WEB RULES WTF! :D lol
Quote from: Say on November 16, 2003, 07:41:02 PMand not every kq is sexy... KQ9 IS secsay :D
I dunno... I think any KQ scene with Alex in it qualifies as secsay! (grins, ducks, and runs)
Peace & Luv, Liz
yeah :)
I dont watch buffy myself but I so know someone who does hahaha, and hes like more addicted to it than a girl with a crappy soap opera :P
But hey! I didnt say like bad guys! hahaha, well I didnt mean it that way!! :P, in fact one of the things I find sexiest the most on a man its personality, beyond good or bad, because -just- pretty boys are the same as -just- pretty girls, without a brain its nothing but a doll :-\, plus, extremely boring I should say.
Quote from: Say on November 16, 2003, 09:17:46 PMI dont watch buffy myself but I so know someone who does hahaha, and hes like more addicted to it than a girl with a crappy soap opera :P
Hee. Well, honestly, I've only seen a little bit of Buffy myself... I just grabbed the first example I could think off of the top of my head. :) Although from what I have seen of Buffy, I was always a Xander fan myself. Yay, Nicholas Brendon, hee.
Quote from: Say on November 16, 2003, 09:17:46 PMBut hey! I didnt say like bad guys! hahaha, well I didnt mean it that way!
Hee! I didn't mean it precisely that way either... just that a lot of women like mysteriousness, spontenaiety and exciting-ness in their men, which "bad boys" possess more often than "good guys". (shrug)
Quote from: Say on November 16, 2003, 09:17:46 PM! :P, in fact one of the things I find sexiest the most on a man its personality, beyond good or bad, because -just- pretty boys are the same as -just- pretty girls, without a brain its nothing but a doll :-\, plus, extremely boring I should say.
Yeah, it might sound just like PC claptrap, but I really do care more about a guy's personality, at least past anything but a casual scope-out. Especially intelligence, and sincerity. Both are supah-secsay. :)
Peace & Luv, Liz
well yeah about bad guys, I tell those girls... -whatever- !!! hahaha I do believe bad guys problematic, and for that crap I got myself already so hahaha, I really havent had nice experiences with trouble guys not even as friends :P
I prefer someone that will make me centered instead of someone that will make my life a mess or a daily adventure, (trust me I am a mess myself I think :D), someone that would somewhat share my same expectations.
And anyways, in fact, you couldnt have said it better yourself, personality and honestly its quite sexy indeed :)
Quote from: Jeysie on November 16, 2003, 09:37:30 PM
Hee! I didn't mean it precisely that way either... just that a lot of women like mysteriousness, spontenaiety and exciting-ness in their men, which "bad boys" possess more often than "good guys". (shrug)
I have mysteriousness, spontaneity, and excitement! ...sorta. ;) I'm so mysterious I don't understand myself, I'm spontaneous in that I do random unexpected stuff on the internet + sometimes in real life, and I can play a *mean* game of bowling. ;)
I wasn't defending, just pointing out that good guys can have those qualities too. ;) Just probably in the more sensible sense.
And while I do like spontaneity, even that is vastly planned out before I go on my trek usually. It's just that the things I choose to do are outside the normal scheme of things, that's all.
I like quiet excitement, and I'm only mysterious in that I have deeper qualities in me that no one has discovered yet, not even me.
well however, its very subjective how you want to see it since everyone has a personal perspective on being for example exciting, on another note I totally agree with jeysie being mysterious its at some level annoying, I think it would adapt better into sort of looks or something because I couldnt be myself with someone whose personality or true self is a complete enigma to me, that is like a platonic love anyways, its not actually someone you can relate to at all if you cant possible know this person or something.
about exciment its also true if you dont share the same interestest at least you will never get to agree on whats excitement on both sides, sort of like the -typical- example the dude a sports fan, and the girl sort of like a book worm or something :P, you would share it cuz you care about this person, not cuz you care about sports :P, but lets face its better if you got more things that will make you together than more than will make you apart.
Spontaneity I believe comes with ppl who are somewhat comfortable with themselves, and they got time to be real and also open about things, not everyone is spontaneous since not everyone knows who they are for real, I think.
So, I believe those are qualities that does comes from your personality, so there is no reason to label it good boys or bad boys I guess, its just details that make someone :P
Quote from: Yonkey on November 17, 2003, 03:09:04 PMIt's fun! I used to have different facades for different people. But for the past few years I've acted the same towards pretty much everyone. :-\
Hmm. Why do you seem upset about that? I can understand maybe goofing off and pretending a bit to strangers you'll never see again, if that's your cup of tea. But you should be honest about yourself with your friends. Nobody said you had to tell all, but you shouldn't hide or pretend either. Acting fundamentally the same way to everyone (hopefully with that way being who you really are) can only be a healthy thing.
Peace & Luv, Liz
Well I think its only natural to act differently towards different people, still tho would be nice to have a one face fore everyone typa thing going on. I'm sure the day will come for me when I stop pretending to be an international supah star to all new peole I meet :P
Well, there's a big difference between, say, having differing levels of formality in different situations, but expressing the same core of general personality, and being totally different around different people.
I mean, for instance, I may restrain my kooky sense of humor if I'm around someone I know wouldn't appreciate it. But I wouldn't pretend I didn't have one, if the matter came up.
Peace & Luv, Liz
WOW, a serious discussion :o
/me runs and hides
Would you rather I went back to drooling over Prince Alex? ;)
Peace & Luv, Liz
No problem here... drool ahead ;)
Omg neil, you are one of the coolest person I ever met, and I do mean it, whatever you consider yourself you are, I dont care :D, to me you are a very nice person, also super smart, fun to be with and one of my friends actually :)
MY TEAM RULEZ :P
And I do also believe that you actually like never stop knowing someone, It takes some time to at least understand and learn most of the things someone does, likes, etc.
I have an absolute personality that everyone sees, and a somewhat superficial personality that superimposes on the solid personality so I can interact with specific types of people better.
But then the guys get extra slobber all over them... ;)
Not that said guys would mind, I'm sure... ;)
Quote from: Yonkey on November 17, 2003, 05:59:34 PM
Once I found my identity and realized that I'm the only one who defines who I am, I put an end to it. :)
very well said :), I liked that.
Quote from: Say on November 17, 2003, 06:01:57 PM
Omg neil, you are one of the coolest person I ever met, and I do mean it, whatever you consider yourself you are, I dont care :D, to me you are a very nice person, also super smart, fun to be with and one of my friends actually :)
MY TEAM RULEZ :P
:) Aww thanks Say!! :-[ This post was so touching I wasn't sure how to reply to it (I'm not good at these kinds of things ;D)! You are a really sweet and kind person. I wouldn't even be here if it you weren't such a supah friend and team member! :)
Quote from: Say on November 17, 2003, 06:01:57 PM
And I do also believe that you actually like never stop knowing someone, It takes some time to at least understand and learn most of the things someone does, likes, etc.
Yeah, I think you can never
completely know someone inside and out because you can't read people's minds and feelings. But the more you get to know someone, the more you know about how they think and feel. So it's like, once you build a trust and understanding with them, that's all you need. But if that trust is ever broken or damaged, you start back at square 1. ::) Still though, the process of learning and understanding doesn't stop when trust is broken. :)
Quote from: mfortunato on November 18, 2003, 02:04:16 PMYes, I am a freak. I watch all of the "supernatural" shows on TV.
So there you have it - you know, truly, what a geekazoid I am. Freaks and Geeks UNITE!!!! Form feet and legs. Form arms and torso, and I'll form the head!
Hee! You like Voltron, too? We'll get along famously. ;)
I stopped watching TV more than just occasionally a few years ago, so unfortunately I've missed a lot of the new SF stuff. But I used to love shows like Babylon 5 (the best SF show EVER), Hercules and Xena (I'm a big Greek myth nut, so I always knew exactly how they ripped apart every one... ;) ), Seven Days, Sliders (Quinn Mallory is the thinking girl's dream guy, IMHO...), seaQuest (O'Neill and Ortiz, yay!), Red Dwarf (Rimmer was a total riot...)... and the more "classic" stuff like The Twilight Zone (now that is how all horror should be done, IMHO).
Peace & Luv, Liz
P.S. Yonkey, why do you always manage to move threads right when I'm in the middle of replying to them? :suffer:
Quote from: copycat on November 19, 2003, 02:57:44 PMWeren't there two seperate series (several years apart) of The Twilight Zone? Anyway, I watched the most recent ones, never could find the original series anyway.
Two series, yes, but much more than several years apart. The original was in the early 60's, and the most recent was a couple years ago, wasn't it? There was also a movie in the mid-80's which wasn't bad, but was mostly a remake of a few of the original's stories.
At any rate, I heartily recommend trying to find some way to watch the original... a good selection of the episodes are available on VHS. (Maybe someday they'll release the series on DVD, and it'll have a solid "must-buy" status right behind Babylon 5, when I finally get some money. :P)
It's just classic psychological horror, the way it should be done. Very little gore or men in rubber monster suits, just a lot of stories that take the everyday world (or at least a futuristic-but-otherwise-fairly-ordinary world), and show you a strange state of mind and supernaturality lurking behind it. It toys heavily with your expectations, and creeps out by revealing some of the more disturbing (or at least bizarre) twists on what we take for granted. Kind of like a really good Babylon 5 episode, actually. (Or a good Ray Bradbury novel/story.)
Outer Limits (both the original and the remake) is good as well, although it tends to drift a little more into "gore and rubber monster suits" territory, rather than sticking with the pure proverbial mindscrew.
Peace & Luv, Liz
Quote from: Jeysie on November 19, 2003, 03:31:44 PMTwo series, yes, but much more than several years apart. The original was in the early 60's, and the most recent was a couple years ago, wasn't it? There was also a movie in the mid-80's which wasn't bad, but was mostly a remake of a few of the original's stories.
The early 60's is a bit before even my time I'm afraid. :)
I'm not the one to ask about exact dates, not even years. Except a few really important ones (like the date when I started my current job), I recall nothing. That's why I have some sort of a journal, in which I type things I find important enough to keep.
I might be confusing Twilight Zone with Outer Limits. However, I don't remember any gore and monster suits, but then again, I recall only very small fragments. As far as Twilight Zone is concerned, I
think I remember seeing it in the tv-listings somewhen (deliberate typo) in the past, but I don't remember watching it (which doesn't mean I didn't, just that I don't have any recollection of it). 8)
I was born on 82 and I dont consider the 80's my time at all :P
That's Odo!! :o
And you call yourself a DS9 fan :P
hahaha wtf? chitlins? hahaha what the hell does that means mike?! :P
î wonder where mike ran off to, I do wonder wth chitlins mean hahaha :P
mike stop making up words :D
I think chitlins are like chicken parts or something, perhaps in his context it means "little ones".
Ooohh... I get weird emotions now did he call me a chicken then?! hhaha :D
anyhow, I never heard that word before :P
http://www.moo-oink.com/ChitlinHistory.htm (http://www.moo-oink.com/ChitlinHistory.htm)
Chitlins! ;D
HAHHAHAHAHA!!! WTF!! "www.moo-oink.com"
hahaha, thanks bob! :D, I feel so much smarter now! :D
...and not at all bothered about being called "pig entrails"? :P
There was a topic to this thread? :P
Jeysie -
Aren't you disclosing some of the participants' names when you're addressing them in the conversation anyway? Not that I recognize the nicks, but still... :P
/me makes a few tweaks and hums innocently.
Peace & Luv, Liz
Quote from: Storm on November 20, 2003, 02:39:26 PM
That's Odo!! :o
And you call yourself a DS9 fan :P
It's not like I was reading a book - his name was spoken, not written ;). I wrote what the name sounded like to me :P
Yes, it seems rude to say pig intestines - but believe it or not, what they don't mention on that site is that the word "chitlin" has also been used as a term of affection for "little ones", for children. Why, I'm not sure. But I've heard it used many times (back in the old days.....;))
Maybe it started out as derogatory, cuz some old people don't like little children. ;) But those little children didn't realize the word had a bad meaning and used it on their kids. ;)
HA HA HA HA - I like that! That's a very logical conclusion, oldbushie!