koko_99_2001's thread

[koko_99_2001]

*sigh* I provide ya'll with proof...and ya'll still refuse to believe it...

[copycat]

*sigh* I provide ya'll with proof...and ya'll still refuse to believe it...

Do you have any idea how many faked pictures there are being sent around the internet each day?

[Louisiana Night]

Couldn't the first one have been fake then?

[koko_99_2001]

YEAH!  The first one could be fake!!

[copycat]

Couldn't the first one have been fake then?

Maybe they were both faked!

[Louisiana Night]

I think that's in Cat's favor.

[copycat]

I think that's in Cat's favor.

Them both being fake? Depends on how you look at it. If the first one was (also) faked, she was actually deceiving us all along.

[koko_99_2001]

Definitely in my favor

EDIT: CC posted before I got my post out...I have not been deceiving you all along...

[copycat]

EDIT: CC posted before I got my post out...I have not been deceiving you all along...

You willing to take an oath on that?

[koko_99_2001]

Depends on what I have to take an oath on

[Louisiana Night]

Like Cat said, it was JAMES that posted that pic.

[copycat]

Like Cat said, it was JAMES that posted that pic.

All I have to say about that is: the longer the road, the more chance there is it being tampered with.

[racx_00]

Yes the first picture was edited , James edited clothes onto the bear because if there was nudity he wouldnt have been able to post the picture

The knife and the stabbing and everything was real, except for the bears clothing

[B'rrr]

ok, lets set this  once and for all!! (cuz this discussion is going on for too long..)

1) the first pic was not fake
2) Cat killed the bear  
3) she denied it, but couldn't bring proof  
4) we asked for a DNA test but she refused  
5) 2347209384 months later we get a pic  
6) that pic wasn't fake either  
7) another bear was used in that pic(must be because the other one was killed (see 2)  

..most likely she hired a stand-in  

it's good that everything is clear now...

[racx_00]

Great explanation , I could never have put it all together

[koko_99_2001]

ok, lets set this  once and for all!! (cuz this discussion is going on for too long..)

1) the first pic was not fake
2) Cat killed the bear  
3) she denied it, but couldn't bring proof  
4) we asked for a DNA test but she refused  
5) 2347209384 months later we get a pic  
6) that pic wasn't fake either  
7) another bear was used in that pic(must be because the other one was killed (see 2)  

..most likely she hired a stand-in  

it's good that everything is clear now...

I did not kill Orli!
1. The pic was not a fake, in that I held a bear and had a knife
2. The bear WAS NOT stabbed, it was just a pose.
3. I posted a pic of Orli alive...AND showed him on webcam to several people
4. I did not refuse a DNA test...ya'll lauged at me for trying to have blood drawn.  When I mentioned cutting off some of his fur for DNA, I explained that in doing so, you would think that I had hurt him.
5. It was only one to two weeks later that I posted the pic.
6. The bear in the pic, as well as the guy friend, are both real!
7. The bear used in both pics are Orlando...Orli!  He wasn't killed..he's still alive and laying on my bed beside my pillow at the moment!

[Louisiana Night]

I've got to agree with Cat on this one.

Orli LIVES!

Besides, Eric saw Orli alive, and he can be a witness(of the  FACT that Orli's alive).

[koko_99_2001]

I'm glad someone finally believes me!

[copycat]

Besides, Eric saw Orli alive, and he can be a witness(of the  FACT that Orli's alive).

Yes, but was that the original (now presumed dead) Orli or the stand-in (Cat presumably hired to cover the trackx of the presumed killed Orli).

[koko_99_2001]

It was the original Orli!