I've just finished the video and my opinion has not changed. What we listen to are lazy folks who satisfy their egos by picking on easy targets.
A better,more thoughtful commentary would be why this game is still viable today. Why do we sitll play KQ6, 20 years after its introduction?
To pick an anectdote, I can negatively critisise the original "Star Trek" too. Sure, "Kirk has a babe on every planet." But the fact is, "Star Trek" still works today, which deserves commentary. Why would a 45 year old show still be an acceptable entertainment today? That is a question that deserves commentary. Making sport of its obvious defiences is too easy and does not deserve comment. One thing the internet has spawned is critics who have no educational foundation--who do not understand the art of critique.
These dudes, whoever they are, cannot challenge themselves to regard what survives. They only regard what doesn't survive. They only remark on the obvious targets. Ho Hum!